The Official Lance Hating Thread

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Robert Merivel said:
Religion was created to control people, however...

"Let He Who Is Without Sin Cast The First Stone" is a great metaphor

I have always liked the prayer, "Please, God, save us from your followers."

Don't we need an equivalent "Lance Tea bagging thread"?
 
PuncturedTyre said:
several points for any God fearing forum people.

i do not believe in the need to have a "higher being". In that i remain an Atheist.

It is my choice.
For other's who believe otherwise, that remains your personal choice.

This post " I AM BETTER THAN JESUS" i found to be very funny.
I was not the author, i stated as such, i simply cut and pasted it, because i found it funny.

If anyone was offended, then dont read it.

How can I be offended by it if i don't read it? Is this an existentialist thing?
 
Apr 1, 2009
120
0
0
Here is the lowest attackt there can be.
If you remember Lance's new woman got impregnated by Lance. We assumed that Lance now has not only super strong endurance capabilities, but also he has some super strong new cancer proof sperm. In medical terms a real miracle.
Now, have you stopped to think that maybe Lance's new woman was banging some other dude? Since the intervention of the holy spirt and further impregnation, we, cycling fans have not been privy to any new info regarding this miracle.
Maybe the new virgin Mary realized the class act that Lance is and went to mess around with a Judas...
let it rip!
 
franciep10 said:
Why do people hate Lance I know why I do because he's a successful *** that has achieved so much because of his suspected doping practices. but I want to know why he's hated more than any doper why is he hated more than any other, simple answer because he won alot and he was smug about it, but that doesn't mean he should be crucified.


P.S. believe in God but don't believe in religion

Fact of the matter:

HYPOCRISY & DOUBLE STANDARDS-TO PRESENT HIMSELF AS A ROLE MODEL BEING A ROTTEN GREEDY MUTHAF***R USING AN ILLNESS TO SHIELD & PROTECT HIS SELF BENEFIT.

That's enough for me to hate him
In all fairness-- I used to be a fan of him--until I found the Truth..

P.S. I hate the most that twittering bull****
 
Mar 10, 2009
6,158
1
0
Juan Pelota said:
Has probably done more and will do more for cancer than any other human being in history. An inspiration to millions suffering from the disease.

Yea, I had never heard of Cancer till Lance spoke the word :rolleyes:

Then the millions of people researching Cancer and possible cures for Cancer were doing nothing till Lance said the word... (maybe too close for me to let this one go)
 
Apr 12, 2009
1,087
2
0
Dr. Wattini said:
Here is the lowest attackt there can be.
If you remember Lance's new woman got impregnated by Lance. We assumed that Lance now has not only super strong endurance capabilities, but also he has some super strong new cancer proof sperm. In medical terms a real miracle.
Now, have you stopped to think that maybe Lance's new woman was banging some other dude? Since the intervention of the holy spirt and further impregnation, we, cycling fans have not been privy to any new info regarding this miracle.
Maybe the new virgin Mary realized the class act that Lance is and went to mess around with a Judas...
let it rip!

Really is this what we've become this is just wrong i'm all for bashing lance but don't bring the guy's family into this, how would you like to hear that your wife or your girl banged a dude and had a kid you're going to take care of, u need to watch Maury those hurt. Keep his family out of this talk about cycling
 
Mar 19, 2009
1,796
0
0
Longer this comeback goes on, the more i dislike him. At the start he was coming back to just to rasie awareness for cancer, now all the stories in the news say he is nearing his goal of winning the our for the 8th time. I don't think it is a bad thing to comeback to try this, but don't be a git and lie about why you're coming back, especially when it is some serious matter like cancer awareness. i am dissapointed with lance, and a bit suspicious of the simeoni not in the giro thing too.


Although maybe all of this is just news stories making me thingk diffferent
 
Mar 10, 2009
504
0
0
Dr. Wattini said:
I remember reading of a guy who had his wife arrested when she was carring doping products over international borders.
Raimundo Rumsas. He podiumed in the 2002 TdF, then had his wife & possibly his mother-in-law transport the dope for him while he got the hell out of France. God, why do I keep space in my head to remember this guy's name?

Rumsas, now there's a guy you can hate.
 
Dr. Wattini said:
BikeCentric,
FYI see the link here
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/12/23/armstrong.baby/index.html
His sperm is super chemo resisitant sperm. That is why I am saying if he was steril and continue to be, the woman got jiggy with some other dude. Why haven't we heard more about this miracle?

LOL, that is hilarious! I was completely unaware of that; I thought we were talking about his 3 kids with his first wife Kristin. Indeed, that means his GF has been banging around! Good for her, that's the proper way for a woman to treat an alpha-male d-bag like Lance. ;)
 
Apr 1, 2009
120
0
0
BikeCentric said:
LOL, that is hilarious! I was completely unaware of that; I thought we were talking about his 3 kids with his first wife Kristin. Indeed, that means his GF has been banging around! Good for her, that's the proper way for a woman to treat an alpha-male d-bag like Lance. ;)

Centric,
you got this straight. I knew about the story and I googled it to post it here. The only stuff that came up was when the story made it into the news which it was around December. I was hoping to see a bunch of new info based on the fact that his nuts were as dry as almonds and all of a sudden the woman is pregnated. In my dictionary that is a miracle. So I was hoping to see that LA was glorified to the level of the Holy Spirt, but nothing, really nothing came up in google. So, if this miracle happened why wouldnt we humans hear more about it? If something like this would happen, the cancer community should be pushing for more news and publishing all over it as this means that if you had testicular cancer, you can still reproduce! and human kind is all about reproducing.
Also this means that Lance rides bareback (no condom). It seems that he is not concerned of any STD's. His super human penis does not catch stds?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
as far as i know its not unheard of.. chemo stops sperm production, as it effects a lot of other things, but im a healthy body things can recover... lance is apparantly now fertile..
i thought his last kid was natural as well, or maybe i dreamt that...
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
May 8, 2009
376
0
0
"Has probably done more and will do more for cancer than any other human being in history. An inspiration to millions suffering from the disease."

Oh, please, stop that b*******. It is a complete lack of disrespect for the people that are really doing something. Cancer is just an alibi for Armstrong to gain notoriety and satisfy his enormous ego and need for being in the center.

Doing things for cancer require to support researching for cures and/or really increase the quality of life of the patients. As for telling us how important it is and how aware we should be about it, cancer supposed 12.5% of all the deaths in the WORLD in 2004 according to WHO, and increasing. Almost every person in the world knows about cancer first hand, since it is very likely that a close person is suffering from it or will soon get cancer.

So please Mr. Armstrong, just ride your bike. If you want to fight cancer focus your efforts in supporting research, such as other famous/wealthy people do with less buzz
(i.e. https://www.fcarreras.org/apoyo_investigacion.php?s=12). Meanwhile it would not be bad if you may recognize your dopping and you´d start a crusade against it :rolleyes: , that is one of the most useful things you could do.
 
Apr 8, 2009
272
0
0
khardung la said:
Oh, please, stop that b*******. It is a complete lack of disrespect for the people that are really doing something. Cancer is just an alibi for Armstrong to gain notoriety and satisfy his enormous ego and need for being in the center.
Thats pretty harsh. No matter what you think of him as a person or cyclist, the fact is that he has generated millions of dollars that would otherwise have gone elsewhere. A lot of people do admire him, (whether you like it or not) and that has directed cash towards the scientists to do play with the lab equipment.

Sorry if this isn't an appropriate post for the 'hating Lance thread'
 
davidg said:
Thats pretty harsh. No matter what you think of him as a person or cyclist, the fact is that he has generated millions of dollars that would otherwise have gone elsewhere. A lot of people do admire him, (whether you like it or not) and that has directed cash towards the scientists to do play with the lab equipment.

Al Capone used to give money to the poor and was admired by those he helped. The rest of the community recognized that he was pox on society.
 
davidg said:
Lets hope you never need his 'help'

I'm sorry guys but it's getting pretty bad -- I just went out tonight with a large circle of friends that know next to nothing about cycling and when one of my friends told them how much I've been riding and racing lately they were immediately all asking me "what is the deal with Lance Armstrong and everyone saying he took drugs?!" It is not just the cycling community that understands what went on anymore, it seems to be the general public is becoming aware of what is going on.

I had to hold forth with the whole spiel on performance enhancing drugs and let them know how much pro cycling is doing to combat them and how little other sports are doing while at the same time admitting that pro cycling has a serious problem with drugs. Armstrong is not helping and he's no longer even fooling the man on the street. He needs to go away and let this sport move on and recover. I understand Paul kimmage's ridiculously harsh words that Lance is "a cancer on the sport" now. Paul was right.
 
Mar 10, 2009
420
1
0
BikeCentric said:
Armstrong is not helping and he's no longer even fooling the man on the street. He needs to go away and let this sport move on and recover.
Actually, Lance is helping cycling immensely at the moment. In a moment when sponsors have been withdrawing, races cancelled, TV stations canceled or reduced their cycling broadcasts, and you don't know who is the winner of a race anymore until next year, Lance's comeback has been essential. See how many people have gone and watched him racing live from Tour Down Under to California; see how televisions are having a renewed interest into cycling, from Eurosport's Lance shows to German TV changing their mind and showing next Tour after all.

You also seem to imply that Lance's doping is discrediting the image of cycling worldwide and we need to go on with a cleaner image that he is tarnishing. I can't agree with this either. While I didn't like him much pre-retirement, with all the doping scandals and Simeoni affair and legal cases and Lemond and Andreu and Pantani, etc. - it's still not (only) him who is bringing cycling down. Actually the worst doping cases - and the all-time low image cycling has now - happened after his retirement.

This is not a praise of Lance as a human being - just about his effect on today's cycling.
 
Apr 8, 2009
272
0
0
Leopejo said:
Actually, Lance is helping cycling immensely at the moment. .... While I didn't like him much pre-retirement,

You are on the wrong thread. This is the 'hating Lance' thread not the 'don't like him very much' thread.:confused:
 
Leopejo said:
Actually, Lance is helping cycling immensely at the moment.

In a moment when sponsors have been withdrawing

races cancelled,

TV stations canceled or reduced their cycling broadcasts,

Let's see:

Sponsors still withdrawing including his own team;

Races still being canceled

Versus not even covering a grand tour (The Giro) that Armstrong has been known to have targeted since the announcement of his return to the sport.

Yep. He's saving cycling from ruin. Hallelujah!
 
Mar 10, 2009
420
1
0
Angliru said:
Let's see:

Sponsors still withdrawing including his own team;

Races still being canceled

Versus not even covering a grand tour (The Giro) that Armstrong has been known to have targeted since the announcement of his return to the sport.

Yep. He's saving cycling from ruin. Hallelujah!
Exactly. Imagine the situation without him...
 
Leopejo said:
Exactly. Imagine the situation without him...

Races would not be in the same financial trouble because they would not have to pay outrageous appearance fees?

The Giro would not have a loooong time trial that sinks the chances of small climbers?

OR

We would not be subjected to three times as much of "a certain rider by the name of Lance Armstrong" as usual from Paul Sherwin?

I am failing to see the upside here.