I guess you must not really like the average GT winner of the past 10 years then.Doesn’t deserve to win this as it stands. If he wasn’t on the same as Hindley, he’d be in third right now IMO.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I guess you must not really like the average GT winner of the past 10 years then.Doesn’t deserve to win this as it stands. If he wasn’t on the same as Hindley, he’d be in third right now IMO.
I guess you must not really like the average GT winner of the past 10 years then.
Felix Grossschartner's inevitable Vuelta win is going to be the real shocker.So in other words Kelderman either wins this or the Giro winner would be a much bigger surprise...
Wtf even is 2020
SubscribedFelix Grossschartner's inevitable Vuelta win is going to be the real shocker.
I also remember one TDF when Landa was dragging Froome's ass to the finishline. But that's why i said "average winner". I know it wasn't the case in every GT, but it's quite common for a lieutenant to be better on crucial moments. However, the fact that Hindley didn't (have to) wait for Kelderman on the queen stage, and still is behind Kelderman in the GC, and likely will lose additional time with the upcoming ITT, tells me two things: Hindley isn't truly "a lieutenant" or else he would have stuck with Kelderman on Stelvio, and secondly the hierarchy within the team is warranted.You're not wrong in principle but I disagree about the overall assessment. A lot of worthy winners and few instances in which a superior lieutenant was held back for a teammate. However, I was pleased when Contador beat Armstrong, displeased when Froome was held back for Wiggins, displeased when Landa was held back for Aru (though pleased Contador fought to a win without much of a team),
If it happened, and you then time traveled back in time and literally showed me video footage of Kelderman with the trophy and all, I would still be disappointed at how it's all happening lolSo in other words Kelderman either wins this or the Giro winner would be a much bigger surprise...
Wtf even is 2020
They all were supposed to win. I saw their threads.I'm rooting for Kelderman now. Not that I really want him to win, but I would see it as a victory for the large group of former Rabobank riders, who, for different reasons, have all failed to achieve a GT and/or other major win. Riders like Thomas Dekker, Weening, Reus, Ten Dam, Gesink, Kruijswijk, Olivier, Slagter, Goos and Mollema (not that I expected all of them would actually win a GT).
Are we comparing Keldermans ability to Froome cause I'm not sure I've ever hated on Froome that much.I also remember one TDF when Landa was dragging Froome's ass to the finishline. But that's why i said "average winner". I know it wasn't the case in every GT, but it's quite common for a lieutenant to be better on crucial moments. However, the fact that Hindley didn't (have to) wait for Kelderman on the queen stage, and still is behind Kelderman in the GC, and likely will lose additional time with the upcoming ITT, tells me two things: Hindley isn't truly "a lieutenant" or else he would have stuck with Kelderman on Stelvio, and secondly the hierarchy within the team is warranted.
It is also quite common for a lieutenant, when finally given the possibility to ride as a leader, to ultimately falter. Poels, Landa, Porte, Soler... It then turns out to be less evident than previously thought, when they were riding for a leader.
There's 2 serious questions for me.
- Did Hindley go full in the stage 14 ITT.
- Did TGH go full on the final climb today?
I think Kelderman might straight out lose the ITT to TGH, and gain like 20-25 at the very max. Hindley's ITT I just don't know. He actually was only 6s back to TGH in Tirreno but I have no idea what his normal ITTs is like.
- The last ITT will be a different story. Just 15 km, Hindley/TGH are more motivated and probably in a better form than Kelderman. It will be hard for the latter to gain any time there if he loses the lead in Sestriere.
- No - that's my impression. The pair slowed down on the last climb. Had Hindley cooperated they could've put another minute into Kelderman (it's a pity that he didn't).
Hindley cooperating with Hart would have been about the stupidest thing he could have possibly done. I can’t see a single benefit to that in any way, unless Hindley wants a move to Ineos next year. And even in that case, he would surely have a better negotiating position as a Giro winner, which he would not be if he worked with Tao on the final climb yesterday.
- The last ITT will be a different story. Just 15 km, Hindley/TGH are more motivated and probably in a better form than Kelderman. It will be hard for the latter to gain any time there if he loses the lead in Sestriere.
- No - that's my impression. The pair slowed down on the last climb. Had Hindley cooperated they could've put another minute into Kelderman (it's a pity that he didn't).
Hindley cooperating with Hart would have been about the stupidest thing he could have possibly done. I can’t see a single benefit to that in any way, unless Hindley wants a move to Ineos next year. And even in that case, he would surely have a better negotiating position as a Giro winner, which he would not be if he worked with Tao on the final climb yesterday.
His situation with Tao would not be the same. If Hindley works with Tao, his chance of winning the stage goes from 90-10 to at best 50-50; probably less given Tao is most likely the better sprinter. If Tao wins the stage, with an extra minute over Kelderman, then Tao takes pink, by 5s over Jai, with a cushion to Kelderman in 3rd.How would HIndlay's chances for Giro lower if he had cooperated with Tao? His situation (regarding Tao) would be the same but he would gain advantage over Kelderman (but obviously team orders prevailed). It's clear that the Giro leader is not the strongest guy and that's why I'm disappointed with that.
1/ Toa would have had to dig less deep (->towards overall fitness/fatigue)How would HIndlay's chances for Giro lower if he had cooperated with Tao? His situation (regarding Tao) would be the same but he would gain advantage over Kelderman (but obviously team orders prevailed). It's clear that the Giro leader is not the strongest guy and that's why I'm disappointed with that.
Safin vs Hewitt was peak tennis for a young aussie like me. Wilco is neither hahaI think every single tennis fan would be offended by that if they knew who Wilco Kelderman was.