Armchair Cyclist
Moderator
I thought Tour results took precedence so Pogacars 1/1/3 is better than Menchovs 1/3/1I've taken the liberty of alphabetising Pogacar after fellow 1/1/3 acheivers Fignon and Menchov.
That’s how I thought it was to when originally conceived.I thought Tour results took precedence so Pogacars 1/1/3 is better than Menchovs 1/3/1
Last year I proposed a slight reworking:I thought Tour results took precedence so Pogacars 1/1/3 is better than Menchovs 1/3/1
This received 5 thumbs up (including SafeBet, who seems to be the main updater now), and one, equivocating, response against, which received 1 thumbs up. My edit on the post-Giro table received a thumbs up from SafeBet, whose table I altered.A slight reworking:
I have (as I proposed after the Giro) made number of podiums (actually, number of different GTs in which they have a podium) as a higher stratum for sorting (Jalabert drops, Fernandez Blanco is biggest gainer);
Where total is the same, I have sorted by number of wins, then 2nds, 3rds etc;
Riders still unseparated are sorted alphabetically (I couldn't see what pattern was there previously);
Your current system works perfectly!Last year I proposed a slight reworking:
This received 5 thumbs up (including SafeBet, who seems to be the main updater now), and one, equivocating, response against, which received 1 thumbs up. My edit on the post-Giro table received a thumbs up from SafeBet, whose table I altered.
Not really a battle worth fighting that much over: should we have a response emoticons vote to decide, or let Safebet consider it his project to do with as he chooses, or what?
Looks like he should be, thanks: thus changed. My preference would be to go with the eventual results, which would have him in the category that the game was originally designed to identify, but respecting the principles of those that originally compiled itShouldn't Sastre have an asterisk like Mollema? He ended 4th on the Giro won by Menchov, but ended up 2nd after Di Luca and Pellizotti were DQed
By that rule, Lejarreta's 2nd in the Vuelta should also be asterisked. He was declared winner of the '82 Vuelta after a positive test by the guy on top of the podium (no DSQ but 10 minutes penalty).Looks like he should be, thanks: thus changed. My preference would be to go with the eventual results, which would have him in the category that the game was originally designed to identify, but respecting the principles of those that originally compiled it
I shouldn't have involved myself in such an historical thread: not my area of expertise. Like I say, I'd go by official lists.By that rule, Lejarreta's 2nd in the Vuelta should also be asterisked. He was declared winner of the '82 Vuelta after a positive test by the guy on top of the podium (no DSQ but 10 minutes penalty).
That, combined with the positive test of 3rd classified Alberto Fernández, promoted Pollentier from 4th to 2nd. Pollentier's best placing at the Vuelta in his other participations was 3rd in 1979. How do you handle that?
So a 3 to 2 vote, we'll build it around the results as the race finished. So I'll double check the Lejarretta/Pollentier situation tomorrow evening.24 hour vote on the like button:
likes for using results as they were the day the race finished
sad face for using the results after any disciplinary action.
I think the best course of action is respecting the original placing and put an asterisk if possible to game-changing updates after suspensions / DQ (4th to 3rd or 2nd to 1st)So a 3 to 2 vote, we'll build it around the results as the race finished. So I'll double check the Lejarretta/Pollentier situation tomorrow evening.
How does that work for Armstrong?So a 3 to 2 vote, we'll build it around the results as the race finished. So I'll double check the Lejarretta/Pollentier situation tomorrow evening.
Armstrong finished 12th originally in 2009 before all of the disqualifications and his own DQ, then never top 10’d/raced another Giro.How does that work for Armstrong?
Yeah but if we are going to use the results immediately at the end of the race, he wasn't DQ'ed yet.Armstrong finished 12th originally in 2009 before all of the disqualifications and his own DQ, then never top 10’d/raced another Giro.
Well yes, but he still doesn‘t make the list. He would show up here as a seven-time Tour winner if this would be shown in this ranking.Yeah but if we are going to use the results immediately at the end of the race, he wasn't DQ'ed yet.