- Jun 29, 2010
- 139
- 0
- 0
2beeDammed said:
2beeDammed said:
2beeDammed said:
87'Start said:Just took delivery of a Rapha Hardshell jacket and long sleeved merino base layer. I don't buy into their marketing/lifestyle vibe and so don't purchase their cycling clothing because of it. I buy Rapha gear (bases, bib, jackets and 3/4s) because of the quality of the finish and long lasting nature of the gear, that is why I pay the extra money. It is stylish to boot; simple and subtle.
Personally I don't get the hate. For those that do, don't just take it as read that anyone in rapha gear is a posing a'hole who takes him/herself too seriously – at least one person doesn't – me. And not being an a'hole I don't judge other people by the company that makes their gear.
teamjva is very funny through... who doesn't love a good parody.
Barracuda said:I have lost the hate and know feel the love.![]()
FignonLeGrand said:And free Hat!!
winkybiker said:Wasn't Hat one of those baby killer types?
Joachim said:Great kit, but double the price it should be and the ****y marketing makes it a no-no for me
That is part of what put's me off Rapha.The logo might as well say "Loadsamoney"Joachim said:I agree in that the marketing is attempting to imbue the product with some kind of ethereal value. That is simply because they have to. The product on its own doesn't justify the price. Equating cycling clothes to other luxury items, say Rolex watches, doesn't quite work, because unlike a watch which is either accurate or it isn't, cycling gear can function better in all sorts of ways.
I have one Rapha item, a jersey. It is excellent, but it costs at the very least 40% more than it should do. I have a near identical jersey from Torm Clothing, which cost about a third of what Rapha charge. Ridiculous, but of course people are free to spend their money where they want, even if it is an ostentatious display of what they can afford or whether they feel they are buying into some kind of mythical cycling heritage thought up in the mind of some marketing man.
LugHugger said:Both Assos and Rapha are expensive. Do they offer a better than average fit and materials? Yes. Do you prefer Assos' techno look or Rapha's 'heritage' look? Make your choice. In the summer I occasionally ride with white collar professionals bedecked in these brands on pristine Italian frames. I ride 52 weeks of the year head to toe in Rapha gear acquired over the last 8 years or so. My original bibs are still going strong and were repaired for free when some of the detail stitching came loose last year. After 20+ years of riding almost every mtb and road brand available, nothing fits better than Rapha. Some people are too quick to judge based purely on appearance and marketing alone.
Bustedknuckle said:I agree..don't get it, the people that 'hate' Rapha(big word-hate).
As for Torm and what Rapha 'should' cost..let the market decide. Rapha is HUGE, Torm could learn a few things from Rapha and how they are marketed.
Do like this one-
http://www.torm.cc/t12.html
But generally, their marketing and product smack of 'boredom'.
Joachim said:In what way does marketing affect the physical qualities of a product?
Surely, an intelligent person disregards the marketing and assess the product on its own merits?
Bustedknuckle said:The marketing department at Nike spends on the order of a $1,000,000,000+ per year.
Trek and Specialized have huge marketing budgets as well. In a perfect world, one would assess the product on it's own merits but marketing is a very strong force when it comes to 'selling'.
Look at magazines, website, THIS website..and all the banners..marketing is very big.
Wallace said:Best proof the Rapha marketing is working? This thread.