The Real Football Thread

Page 190 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I honestly think this is just a phase of international football that's gonna pass. I mean the knockouts in Euros and Worlds have been cautious games my entire life, but the fact that it's so f*cking bad this tournament can easily be put down to the fact that argubly the three most talented teams are coached by Deschamps, Southgate and Martinez who are all mediocre coaches prefering these kind of tactics. Nobody felt like there was a shift to super defensive football during the group stages but now that we are constantly confronted with these teams their tactics are more and more in the center of attention.

That being said, man do I hope France and England both lose. Unbelievable how they are playing with these kind of players at their disposal. I know everyone is now on the "they made it to the semis so their tactics must have been the correct one" wave, but if you have a squad this good you should not have to depend on winning a penalty shootout. You cannot tell me England, who needed a late equalizer for the second game in a row, is actually tactically set up in a way that maximizes their chance to win.
Everybody worships Guardiola, but the way he sets up is inherently negative, and predicated on quick, niggling fouls by forward players as soon as the ball is lost in order to prevent any momentum being built up by the opposition; typically they will have been under pressure for a while so will try to get the ball deep from a free kick in their own half, from which Pep's guys can recover the ball and restart.

That works fine when you've got the kind of passers and players he has had at his disposal because you can just keep battering on the door until you finally break through. But once that cheap trick was spotted (seriously, once adjusted for time in possession of the ball, Pep's teams have been the dirtiest in the league in La Liga, the Bundesliga and the EPL, and the main culprits of the fouls have been forward players), but when you're looking at international teams that don't play with each other week in week out and have to build that chemistry on the fly, or simply just teams that don't have the quality of passing and vision that the teams Pep has managed have on hand, it creates a very negative game, lots of sideways and backwards passing, lots of seemingly aimless drifting passes across the defence, and a lot of niggling fouls in the midfield (exacerbated by a ruleset and instructions to referees that do not penalise even the most egregious and blatant simulation, especially if done by star players who 'need protection'. But I'm sure that Jude Bellingham's 95th-minute bicycle kick will be replayed a lot more than the blatant dive when the Slovak defender didn't even put a leg in that should have earned him a second yellow 25 minutes earlier), and largely the best way for teams to nullify the big teams playing this way has been to flood the midfield and stifle them with organisation, leading to a lot of low scoring games, as those teams tend to operate well as long as they are ahead or level, but struggle once they fall behind.

Essentially, the only teams that came here to play football were teams like Austria, Romania and Turkey, and they've all hit against the glass ceiling. Knockout football is a different kettle of fish and sadly it's also one that tends too often to reward negative and frustrating play.

The other thing that you have is that you only need to play well once. Portugal in 2016 and Argentina in 2022 showed that clearly. I don't think you could find a single person who could watch every game in the 2022 World Cup and tell you with a straight face that Argentina were a better team than France across the course of that World Cup. But, they got to the final by hook or by crook (especially by crook), and then it comes down to who was better on that one particular day. And the Argentines were the better team on that one day and they got to go home with the prize. And they won't care one iota that they played crappy football most of the time. Likewise Portugal in 2016.

Hell, likewise Spain in 2010. Everybody talked about what beautiful football they played and have whitewashed their vision of that team like they were Brazil 1982 or something, but they lost 1-0 to Switzerland in the group stage, then in the knockout stages they won 1-0, 1-0, 1-0 and 1-0 (after extra time) while the pundits lined up to sycophantically dribble about how this was how football was meant to be played.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red Rick
Southgate is a special case IMO. Man relegated Middlesbrough then got the England job as if England are a Championship team.

But the best managers don't take national teams and while it's very understandable it's also a bit sad.

He’s been very lucky at these tournaments. First with the draws, at 2018, 2020, 2022, and this year. As soon as they play a fancied team or when they can’t rely on luck as much, they lose. Not one game of theirs has been, ‘wow, they played well.’
 
...

Hell, likewise Spain in 2010. Everybody talked about what beautiful football they played and have whitewashed their vision of that team like they were Brazil 1982 or something, but they lost 1-0 to Switzerland in the group stage, then in the knockout stages they won 1-0, 1-0, 1-0 and 1-0 (after extra time) while the pundits lined up to sycophantically dribble about how this was how football was meant to be played.

Brazil 1982 is vastly overrated. If @Red Rick watched the Brazil - USSR of the 1982 World Cup he would break the r, o, b, e and y keys of his keyboard .
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: gunara and Red Rick
All these years international tournaments have been relied so much on hype and fandom, excitement on the pitch have only been provided by very small number of teams, some of them always went home early. It's almost vain to look for quality.

And being far too accustomed to previous eras of football, including playing and administering an academy, I don't know what is to expect anymore, some things and standards have changed so much. And it's getting harder to asses which changes are justified or necessary with too much information and opinions around, from every level of reliability. Quality - whatever that means - might not be all lost, but characters and distinct brand of football are harder to established.
 
Nothing wrong with that penalty, Dumfries was needlessly reckless with his blocking attempt. If things like that are being left ungiven, defenders just get a completely unfair and unjustified advantage.

Yeah, tackling/blocking in the penalty area always comes with a risk of failing, and if you hit the opponent instead of the ball, it could very well lead to a penalty.

It hasn't killed the game though. It's actually pretty good at the moment.
 
Any Dutchman who thinks that they weren't outplayed pretty comprehensively is as blind as any Englishman who thinks that that wasn't the softest penalty of the several extremely soft penalties England have got across Southgate's run of invulnerability.

While feigning injury has been a long-running problem of trying to win free kicks and penalties, waste time, kill momentum and get opponents carded, VAR has massively worsened it as a problem, of players playing hurt to prevent the game from being restarted and force replays to be shown to get VAR to look at things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gunara
Well it's not exactly unheard of that the guy who gets the ball first gets rewarded. I don't think Kane's kick was much worse than Dumfries, so he would also have committed a foul if the latter had touched the ball first.

But if that view makes me a blind Englishman, so be it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gunara