They say, it's interval training with torque efforts and heat training. Some core strength work and riding around in "zone 2". Sounds replicable to me.I don’t think they have the same training methods
They say, it's interval training with torque efforts and heat training. Some core strength work and riding around in "zone 2". Sounds replicable to me.I don’t think they have the same training methods
Trainer on a scooter with a cattle prodder perhaps.I don’t think they have the same training methods
Hope springs eternal, I guess.No miracles needed. Just a year of consistent training without injuries and he will be at Pogacars level. Can't wait!
Whats interesting is that stating facts isn’t the same as hating, just to be clear. Not saying Remco doesn’t have haters im sure he has and who you refer to I dont know, but some people also just point out the obvious also. Thats not hate, it’s reality.I think 75% of the posters here are people who dislike Remco.
I think it's been interesting watching the tone change in this thread a bit in the last several days. I think it's somewhat normal as a top rider moves from one team to another. Some folks who are fans of the new team react to the change, some folks who are fans of the old team might feel a bit put off by a big rider leaving, and fans of particular riders seem to have reactions to how this change will impact their favorite rider.I think 75% of the posters here are people who dislike Remco.
25% are people who want him to do well, and are genuine fans.
I know Remco is polarising, but this says something. So many people don't like him for various reasons.
Yet strangely i'm starting to think the biggest reason is that despite their complete and utter belief he could never be a true rival for their favourite (possible true GT wise if Pogacar remains an alien, his level can always drop a bit though), remco is seen as a possible threat to them.
I know people will laugh away this comment and make fun of me for saying this. But it's the feeling i'm starting to get from people posting here.
Koopa and Red Flanders make good points but sooner or later all the extenuating circumstances are for not..bad team, bad luck, incomplete recovery, Remco list is endless for underachieving and potential that petered out.. Pro sports is filled with stories about athletes who were predicted to be great, greatest and instead came up short. Bora already will need to make structural decisions for 2026 Giro..send anyone or save everyone, everything for TDF if that is what is on Remco's radar..Whats interesting is that stating facts isn’t the same as hating, just to be clear. Not saying Remco doesn’t have haters im sure he has and who you refer to I dont know, but some people also just point out the obvious also. Thats not hate, it’s reality.
It’s going to be interesting to see next season. Remco is coming off a terrible year, with honestly more question marks than the latest round of excuses served by him and his team. Ironically, these are the same people who, before the Dauphine, Tour, and Liege, claimed he was in top form and better than ever(last year), same people who along with Remco forced him into the classics with a lesser base for whatever reason, and which directly contradicts their latest statement of excuses..
Remco definitely has something to prove next season cause its becoming a meme, first of all I want him to consisently prove he can climb on a top tier level, lets all hope for that and move from there.
Both Remco and Lipowitz would have to know that, if they're not up to the demands of being featured at a race that acknowledging the team's analysis of who is featured will rule. Better than kicking up an issue before a race and then proving everybody right by sucking during the featured race. These guys are smarter than that.What happens if Remco struggles like this year and/or Lipowitz emerges as a better tour rider?
Could be some dissension in the red bull ranks
That's interesting, I would very much agree he's got a lot of time left. He's been around so long coming from the juniors that it's easy to forget the guy is 25 and if he wants, has a long career ahead of him. He has an impressive palmares already.He probably has many years of possibility for grand tours but nobody involved talks or acts like it.. Remco acts like his career is ice cream sitting out in August sun!!!
What exactly has Pelgrim ever proven? He got lucky he got to work with Evenepoel. Which riders has Pelgrim improved? If anything, since he came, level at SQS has dropped like a brick.It's kind of a cliché to think Quickstep are that far behind the times. In fact it was Bora who were quite oldschool until recently, and Evenepoel's new coach already worked there. His current performance coach Koen Pelgrim is quite young, and has of course guided him to a grand tour win. I don't think the training philosophy has been the problem until now.
I for one don't expect any miracles like Pogi's new coach managed to do.
7-9 seasons at peak level? Good for Remco, he has only had 1 peak level season so far. 😁The thing with Remco is that, while his top level is exceptional, he so seldomly reaches it in stage races. His breakthrough performance was in Clasica San Sebastian 2019; if we look at stage races it was Pologne 2020. Fast forward to 2025 and he has only managed to win one Vuelta, which was front-loaded, had a relatively underwhelming field, where the top competitor crashed out. Then he has a podium spot in the Tour, where he was distant third, although way ahead of number four. He has not managed to win a single one of the seven major stage races. He has abandoned three Grand Tours and collapsed out of GC in a fourth. Sure he has been sick and has had crashes and injuries, but that is the thing isn't it? If 70 % of the time there is something wrong with you, and you seemingly take a half to a full season to recover each time, then you are just not gonna be a force in Grand Tours. Roglic also has had countless crashes and injuries, but he is usually already ready to race for the win in the next race.
Remco is still young, but based on cycling history, the norm is 7-9 seasons at peak level no matter how early you start performing.
On the one hand you say that his crash clearly affected his performance this Tour and then call last year’s Tour a fluke. All his “bad” performances can be explained by things like a crash, so don’t you think it makes sense that performances like TDF ‘24 is normal when everything goes fine?Partly Im sure for some people, but for others, what actually happens on the road matters just as much, if not more and just focusing on the fundamentals. Lets not pretend Remco didnt rush into the classics fully aware of the variables at play. My point is that for some, real world performance carries more weight than wishful thinking. Obviously, I can only speak for myself but yeah, that’s how I see it.
And to be clear, I’m not saying he had a good winter or that how the season unfolded as a whole it didnt affect him, especially in the Tour etc, but realistically aknowledging Remco climbing is sus in general (currently his 24 tour climbing is more an outliner than the norm factually), aknowledging these fundamentals and some other questionsmarks regarding him imo isnt hate at all but just realistic imo at this point, but again can only speak for myself im sure theres people hating.
7-9 seasons at peak level? Good for Remco, he has only had 1 peak level season so far. 😁
Haha true7-9 seasons at peak level? Good for Remco, he has only had 1 peak level season so far. 😁
Haha trueLets be nice to him and say two, 2022 and 2024. I should have been more precise though, riders usually do not have a great season more than 8 years after they first reach their peak level (or close). Take Sagan, Alaphillippe, Froome, Contador, Rodriguez. The list is long with very few exceptions, like Valverde. There are actually only three riders who have managed to win a Grand Tour more than 8 years after their first. If we say Remco hadn't quite reached his potential pre-2022, then this should be his fourth year at prime age/level, he won't do the Vuelta this year, which means he has burned through about half of his prime with only a single GT win.
But isn't TdF 2024 better than fall 2022?First step is to have 1-2 full seasons with no (bad) crashes. See if he can get back to fall of 22 form. I am not convinced that is a sure thing.
Well he is certainly among the top top tier of riders, just not stage race or Grand Tour riders. His success in championships is unprecedented. 2 X Liege and 3X San Sebastian is also nothing to scoff at. But eventually you also have to ask yourself why crashes, illness and rushed prep is so much a problem for Remco compared to other riders, and why should we believe it won't be a problem in the remainder of his career?half a season actually.
I find it pretty humorous all the posting about having underachieved and not having much of a palmares.
AFAIK, over the last 3-5 seasons he is second only to Pog in PCS points (despite the many months he has ended up away from competition). He is ranked 45th all-time. And he is 25.
Sure crashes, illness and rushed prep have dented what could have been a general palmares that was even better. But to say that his career has basically been a failure is absolutely ludicrous.
First step is to have 1-2 full seasons with no (bad) crashes. See if he can get back to fall of 22 form. I am not convinced that is a sure thing.
No matter what he will never compete with the 24-25 Pog. So why is that the only comparison repeated ad nauseam by Pog fans (who spend most of their time in this thread for some very odd reason)?
Amstel..., no I'm struggling after that.Half broken, he was still good enough to screw Pog out of Amstel, lol, so let's just agree to disagree. Top form Evenepoel has plenty of races where he can bring the fight to Pog.
I think it's not so much about him being a potential threat to other riders. That may partially be true but many are here to point out daily why he isn't good enough to be a threat. I think it all comes down to the level of attention he gets. Many feel its "hype" or just not warranted, even accounting for his wins. What they forget is that by posting here, they are just part of the buzz.I think 75% of the posters here are people who dislike Remco.
25% are people who want him to do well, and are genuine fans.
I know Remco is polarising, but this says something. So many people don't like him for various reasons.
Yet strangely i'm starting to think the biggest reason is that despite their complete and utter belief he could never be a true rival for their favourite (possible true GT wise if Pogacar remains an alien, his level can always drop a bit though), remco is seen as a possible threat to them.
I know people will laugh away this comment and make fun of me for saying this. But it's the feeling i'm starting to get from people posting here.