We'll see after Liège.And the benefits are nearly non-existent. What does it matter whether he loses 2 seconds or 5 seconds on a finish like yesterday, if in turn he can't follow on a long climb because of it.
We'll see after Liège.And the benefits are nearly non-existent. What does it matter whether he loses 2 seconds or 5 seconds on a finish like yesterday, if in turn he can't follow on a long climb because of it.
Very good today not gonna lie. Thought hed struggle with the gradients today but didnt lose a second despite missing a turn.We'll see after Liège.
He's where I expected him to be after 5 stages.
All eyes on him tomorrow. Race is not against Pogacar (unless Pog has a bad day) but to test himself on such slopes against a strong field of climbers.
Then again he appears to be the only one trying to take the race to Pog (however futile that may be).
Credit there I think, particularly to any haters who also complain about Pog domination.
It's a possibility but I wouldn't make it "more" than probable for him not to make the podium. The first pass over the top of the Monte Carpegna is probably with the GC group. I assume we will see attacks on the 2nd pass. I guess it's about a 20 min effort at 10% with a few steep parts of 15% early in the climb. It looks challenging but I don't think he will stall his engine on the steep slopes. I can still see him losing a minute vs Pogacar but I haven't seen any signs from Vingegaard, Lopez of Tao G-H that they will crush him. What I do fear is that if he does come under pressure after passing the top 20-30 sec down vs his podium challengers that he takes too much risk in the steep, 12-km long decent. I hope he can keep his cool.Actually the fastest guy on T-A so far (taking off the boni seconds) but his one minute advantage on climbers such as Vingegaard, Lopez, and Tao G-H will more than probably be insufficient to podium this race.
I wish the last stage would be a real TT stage, to make up for that ridiculously short stage one
He tried that, Pogacar is straight on his wheel.I understand he's still discovering how to race a stage race of this level. Still, i'd like to see him taking some risk like approaching a stage as it was a one-day race and set up his trademark long range attacks. IMO the only way to threaten Pogacar. Go all-in.
Longer ITT? You’ll never get disagreement from me. ;-)
However, I doubt that would allow him to challenge Pog (who would just detonate earlier to make up the time lost). However, it may have ensured a podium spot.
I hope he allows himself to be dropped and do the diesel and pull back some people, rather than desperately try to match the accelerations as he did at Valenciana.
I also worry about his state of mind for the first time running up against someone who is definitely stronger after years of easy domination at every level so far. How he takes it will be very important in his development.
He is only 22. Just.
5 years ago a 22 year old would be considered incredibly young with their future and growth ahead of them. Remco is “unfortunate” to have arrived in the era of Pog (and to a lesser degree, Bernal) who have altered our idea of age in cycling fundamentally.
https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/ev...ng-wrong-way-during-tirreno-adriatico-attack/There was almost nothing and no one to show us that we should go right. So instead of this, we continued to ride straight ahead.
https://www.cyclingnews.com/races/brussels-cycling-classic-2021/brussels-cycling-classic/results/It’s weird that some of the guys went the wrong way because we all have the route in our computers.
Maybe in Italy they have problems with the computers like they do getting us good angles.Spot the difference.
After going the wrong way himself:
https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/ev...ng-wrong-way-during-tirreno-adriatico-attack/
After winning because the rest went the wrong way:
https://www.cyclingnews.com/races/brussels-cycling-classic-2021/brussels-cycling-classic/results/
Yep, but the two aren't mutually exclusive, are they? The context in Brussels Cycling Classic was whether they should have waited for those who took the wrong turn. But here, I can't remember him asking for the peloton to grant them the lead they lost again. So while it may be funny that he now faces the short end of the stick, it's not quite as hypocrite as you may want to paint it. Yes, the riders are supposed to know the route, he wasn't wrong there. But the organization also has responsibilities and here they were lacking, and he wasn't wrong here either.Spot the difference.
After going the wrong way himself:
https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/ev...ng-wrong-way-during-tirreno-adriatico-attack/
After winning because the rest went the wrong way:
https://www.cyclingnews.com/races/brussels-cycling-classic-2021/brussels-cycling-classic/results/
Yep, but the two aren't mutually exclusive, are they? The context in Brussels Cycling Classic was whether they should have waited for those who took the wrong turn. But here, I can't remember him asking for the peloton to grant them the lead they lost again. So while it may be funny that he now faces the short end of the stick, it's not quite as hypocrite as you may want to paint it. Yes, the riders are supposed to know the route, he wasn't wrong there. But the organization also has responsibilities and here they were lacking, and he wasn't wrong here either.
But humorous, i agree.
What a load of crock. He didn't go on the attack due to an error of the marshals!Lol @ QS on Facebook, "After he went off course while on the attack due to an error of the marshals, the Belgian made it back in the peloton and concluded the stage in the blue jersey group!"
Today is the day,this boy will be on fire,
From January^^.A good schedule and a good winter without problems, so we should get a good impression of his climbing talents this year. No Les Forges in Liège, so it's straightforward that he should attack on/just after La Redoute. I certainly have higher expectations for him in Liège (where he has an outside chance to win) than Tirreno and Itzulia (where I think he's likely in the 3rd-6th range). I'm not sure what to expect of Suisse, but I think it's fair to say that with this program the measure of a successful Vuelta is the podium? That he at least in one mountain stage shows elite level climbing? If no illness, crashes etc., what would it take before he disappointed (whatever post-hoc unreasonable expectations one might have), Logic?