There is the money aspect. Then again PL is likely trying to influence the GT race organizers in regards to the stages too. More flat ITT more likely Remco will participate.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I understand the comparison, but obviously this is not the case. First of all, this is the image he likes to create, that of being a poor schmo, the ultimate underdog who has to battle against titans. David and Goliath. Secondly, you don't get decades of results by running a team like PCT pseudo amateurs. And finally, there is some truth to the first point, but obviously not to the extent he likes to pretend. But it is true that in order to compete against bigger and richer teams, the team has to be run like a tight ship. I do believe that if you put another manager in his place with the same means, that the team would crumble. I believe the reason why the team has been as successful as it has been given the circumstances, is exactly because he is in full control.Lefevre running stuff like a small Italian PCT team and openly talking about it.
Yeah, it was a bit of a hyperbole and mainly a jab at his obsession to monetize everything.I understand the comparison, but obviously this is not the case. First of all, this is the image he likes to create, that of being a poor schmo, the ultimate underdog who has to battle against titans. David and Goliath. Secondly, you don't get decades of results by running a team like PCT pseudo amateurs. And finally, there is some truth to the first point, but obviously not to the extent he likes to pretend. But it is true that in order to compete against bigger and richer teams, the team has to be run like a tight ship. I do believe that if you put another manager in his place with the same means, that the team would crumble. I believe the reason why the team has been as successful as it has been given the circumstances, is exactly because he is in full control.
This doesn't mean i agree with everything he does or that i think the team doesn't make mistakes.
After defending his Tour crown, next year fulfilled Vingegaard will get back to a calm fisherman's life.
Pogacar, after another year of Merckxian craziness, will be a crippled (he's almost there already) and burnt-out, old man.
Then Remco, a new sheriff in town, will enter the scene and beat all those wannabes at the Tour!
...good point Rick Moderator. I was also wondering how much influx or influence does Remco have in the decisions? i.e. Patrick says "no Vuelta" Remco says "yes Vuelta".How much is it not just Lefevere angling for Vuelta appearance fees.
He definitely succeeded in maximizing his opportunities with his budget. The bigger question is if Remco's ambitions are a good fit with Lefevre's plans? Lefevre may do the right things for the team and still damage Remco's career, in particular his GT ambitions. I think this is a clear risk now as SQS classic team evaporated and the decision to build a GT team conflicts with strengthening his classic team.Yeah, it was a bit of a hyperbole and mainly a jab at his obsession to monetize everything.
One can't deny his talent as a team ower and to pick the right people as ds/staff members an so on. That's why I called him the ani-Saronni. Lefevre can be a bit of a PR nightmare, but he has been running a top team for decades, that one is hard to deny.
Then it's yes Vuelta. Lefevere has already said a couple of times that when Evenepoel wants to ride a certain race, that he is the one to make the final call. Even after his Giro DNF, he said that Evenepoel would not go to the Tour... unless he really wanted to himself. Evenepoel was also the one to decide going to the 2020 Giro while that was not planned (he stalked Lefevere on whatsapp with Italian flags). Then he crashed, and again Evenepoel wanted to go to the 2021 Giro, which the team should have advised against more firmly....good point Rick Moderator. I was also wondering how much influx or influence does Remco have in the decisions? i.e. Patrick says "no Vuelta" Remco says "yes Vuelta".
If he's good enough to go to le Suisse he's good enough to go to a training camp to prepare le tourLefevre not happy that Remco is going to Suisse...
The lack of funding seemed to be more the problem, "Eight days of racing in Switzerland, with the Swiss prices at the pump and in the shops, try to fund that with 8,500 euros."Lefevre not happy that Remco is going to Suisse...
I learned something newThen it's yes Vuelta. Lefevere has already said a couple of times that when Evenepoel wants to ride a certain race, that he is the one to make the final call. Even after his Giro DNF, he said that Evenepoel would not go to the Tour... unless he really wanted to himself. Evenepoel was also the one to decide going to the 2020 Giro while that was not planned (he stalked Lefevere on whatsapp with Italian flags). Then he crashed, and again Evenepoel wanted to go to the 2021 Giro, which the team should have advised against more firmly.
Or actually prepare to defend his Vuelta title against the prior victor. The one that crashed out of '22 Vuelta and just won the Giro. If that isn't a showdown to settle the score (at least for fans) I don't know of a race that would advance his WC ambitions better.If he's good enough to go to le Suisse he's good enough to go to a training camp to prepare le tour
It is the biggest race and even if not at 100% he should go. One never knows what will happen in the race and how the body will react. All this waiting around for I do not even know what is pretty ridiculous.Except that it makes perfect sense. He peaked for the Giro, had to recover from covid and just started training a few days ago. If he went to the Tour he would never be in top shape and he could never prolong his Giro peak throughout the Tour and into the WCC. Maybe he could do a top 10 in the TDF, but that's not where his ambitions lie. If he goes, he wants to win or at least contend for victory. Going for stages is a complete waste of time, they will automatically come whenever he goes in the future. Especially since winning a WCC (RR or TT) easily tops a stagewin in the Tour. Even more so because in that scenario he could still realistically ad Vuelta where he can go for a second GC win as well as multiple stage wins, with Lombardia afterwards.
So it makes one-zero-zero sense.
Basically the choice is between being able to ride the Tour unprepared, with dubious form, and not being able to compete for much else all year in peak form, except perhaps Lombardia.It is the biggest race and even if not at 100% he should go. One never knows what will happen in the race and how the body will react. All this waiting around for I do not even know what is pretty ridiculous.
Grand Tours is what counts. WCC and Lombardia are nice but it is better to show yourself and have a decent result at the Tour (which I believe Remco can have) than it is to be the ITT WC.Basically the choice is between being able to ride the Tour unprepared, with dubious form, and not being able to compete for much else all year in peak form, except perhaps Lombardia.
And on the other hand ditching the Tour, getting ready to ride the WCC well prepared, in peak form, do San Sebastian and Vuelta and Lombardia and being able to compete for the win in all of them.
Basically, do you value a top 10 in the Tour higher than a podium in La Vuelta in addition to being able to go to the WCC at full strength? For me this is a no-brainer, even if you might describe it as "for I do not even know what".
Grand Tours count. So do WCC and monuments.Grand Tours is what counts. WCC and Lombardia are nice but it is better to show yourself and have a decent result at the Tour (which I believe Remco can have) than it is to be the ITT WC.
I think Remco also just wants to check stuff off his list. WC ITT and Lombardia being one of them.Grand Tours is what counts. WCC and Lombardia are nice but it is better to show yourself and have a decent result at the Tour (which I believe Remco can have) than it is to be the ITT WC.
Actually being two of them.I think Remco also just wants to check stuff off his list. WC ITT and Lombardia being one of them.
One would take the Vuelta win for sure, but neither is a given. One could always make such assumptions and thus never go to the Tour. At the end of the day I believe a little sickness should not derail the whole season and therefore he should make the adjustment to go to the Tour after racing just 9 days at the Giro.Grand Tours count. So do WCC and monuments.
So, even if you want to discard 1 day races, would you value a 6th place at the Tour over a win at the Vuelta?
He would go against the defending champion, who has been working towards this goal and comes 100% prepared, while he (Evenepoel) did not work towards that goal, already peaked for LBL 2 months ago, did not have the best preparation, missing the ideal altitude camps, not having done any recons etc. Is it impossible for him to win the TDF? Maybe not, maybe Vingegaard crashes out, Pogacar also didn't have the best prep with his wrist, etc. But chances of him winning are slim at best. While if he goes to the Vuelta, he has a 50% chance of winning, in case he doesn't crash or get sick.One would take the Vuelta win for sure, but neither is a given. One could always make such assumptions and thus never go to the Tour. At the end of the day I believe a little sickness should not derail the whole season and therefore he should make the adjustment to go to the Tour after racing just 9 days at the Giro.
Well, if Pogacar goes there, with Roglic also present, his percentage will decrease dramatically...He would go against the defending champion, who has been working towards this goal and comes 100% prepared, while he (Evenepoel) did not work towards that goal, already peaked for LBL 2 months ago, did not have the best preparation, missing the ideal altitude camps, not having done any recons etc. Is it impossible for him to win the TDF? Maybe not, maybe Vingegaard crashes out, Pogacar also didn't have the best prep with his wrist, etc. But chances of him winning are slim at best. While if he goes to the Vuelta, he has a 50% chance of winning, in case he doesn't crash or get sick.
What happens when he goes to the Tour and crashes out or gets sick again? Then it is a completely wasted season. Because then he won't get ready for the WCC and surely can't peak for a 3rd GT in one year. Let him go to the WCC and then defend his Vuelta title, and come back next year fully prepared to tackle the Tour.