I disagree, because there was clearly no alternative motive. He was just venting his in my view misplaced anger with the organization.Feel free to disagree. Let's see what happens during the rest of the race.
I disagree, because there was clearly no alternative motive. He was just venting his in my view misplaced anger with the organization.Feel free to disagree. Let's see what happens during the rest of the race.
It has nothing to do with "wanting" not to pay attention, sometimes it just happens. Errare humanum est, perseverare autem diabolicum (as you are intentionally doing with your intentional deprecations).
Love the Latin. Thank you ExtinctionIt has nothing to do with "wanting" not to pay attention, sometimes it just happens. Errare humanum est, perseverare autem diabolicum (as you are intentionally doing with your intentional deprecations).
I disagree, the overhead shot is clear. this setup was bonkers. Yes remco should have slammed his breaks earlier/harder, but if you really can't see any fault in the setup of those people... tja. You see that Vingegaard/Ayuso stopped in time, but they were not out of the way of the other riders that were coming!I disagree, because there was clearly no alternative motive. He was just venting his in my view misplaced anger with the organization.
Remco for not braking in time, but you already know that.Ok, help me out, my intentional deprecation of what?
That I did not think the finish today was unsafe (edit: and would need changing)? Seriously, what am I deprecating?
Regardless if the landing pad should have been longer, he clearly wasn't looking ahead and paying attention to his environment. Now I don't deride him for that, as another has, but admit he messed up, because there was room to brake. But, yes, there should have been more road to the barriers. Yet in Spain in a MTF often the "landing pad" is quite brief. Hopefully he won't have any consequences from the crash, as clearly he was the strongest today. He looked as explosive as a fine Pogi, which is very impressive, considering he's the best TTer in the world.I disagree, the overhead shot is clear. this setup was bonkers. Yes remco should have slammed his breaks earlier/harder, but if you really can't see any fault in the setup of those people... tja. I think its worthy shout out, even if he had breaked
Now don't crucify me for this, but nor did Remco think to look ahead.here is the overhead shot, thanks to Nightowl in the stage 3 forum for posting it. I have seen the original but it's on Sporza so not linkable without georestrictions.
Also look at how all riders behind had to brake. The organisation simply didn't think about a group sprint.
No, you're absolutely right. It's like having a right of way, seeing a big tractor and not braking with the bike. So you can put on the grave: "I had right of way".Now don't crucify me for this, but nor did Remco think to look ahead.
Yea, exactly, unfortunately, in the euphoria and not expecting the road to end so suddenly, he just wasn't looking ahead. Hopefully there will be no consequences, but the next two days should be pretty straightforward, so there is time to recover.No, you're absolutely right. It's like having a right of way, seeing a big tractor and not braking with the bike. So you can put on the grave: "I had right of way".
He underestimated his own speed, and he was too much 'in the moment' to quickly think about the practicalities after the finish line.
Remco for not braking in time, but you already know that.
You said he celebrated first and thought about safety later. Most people assume that it’s safe to celebrate, since everyone does itHuh?
There was literally nothing about the finish area today that prevented Evenepoel both from celebrating and not crashing.
I think there is no risk of that.Was Evenepoel not braking in time something that I should have approved for you not to call it deprecation?
Mistakes happen and obviously (bolded for you to be as explicit is possible) what happened today was not intentional.
Where the disagreement lies (I think) as that I do not see what happened as a reason to encourage inattentiveness (obviously unintentional as no sane person would want to crash, again highlighted for the sake of explicitness) by shifting blame away or trying to accommodate such future inattentiveness.
You said he celebrated first and thought about safety later. Most people assume that it’s safe to celebrate, since everyone does it
We put the finish line immediately before a corner on a steep downhill, and you decided to celebrate your stage win instead of expecting us to block off your run-out right at the bottom of that steep downhill? Silly you, why would you be so inattentive!?Was Evenepoel not braking in time something that I should have approved for you not to call it deprecation?
Mistakes happen and obviously (bolded for you to be as explicit is possible) what happened today was not intentional.
Where the disagreement lies (I think) as that I do not see what happened as a reason to encourage inattentiveness (obviously unintentional as no sane person would want to crash, again highlighted for the sake of explicitness) by shifting blame away or trying to accommodate such future inattentiveness.
Right because it's so easy to look over the hill when you are sprinting over itI would hope that most people also think before celebrating how much time they would have to slow down once the hands are back on the brakes.
Look, you emphasized the mistake clearly as a put-down in deprecatory fashion, not in terms of human error, however unfortunate for him. And who is encouraging inattentiveness? The fact that you make such a misguided remark only underscores the deprecatory way you view the mistake, as something blameworthy - and not just in the outcome, but morally on him - which is where I totally disagree with you.Was Evenepoel not braking in time something that I should have approved for you not to call it deprecation?
Mistakes happen and obviously (bolded for you to be as explicit is possible) what happened today was not intentional.
Where the disagreement lies (I think) as that I do not see what happened as a reason to encourage inattentiveness (obviously unintentional as no sane person would want to crash, again highlighted for the sake of explicitness) by shifting blame away or trying to accommodate such future inattentiveness.
I think people differ in behaviour and what one thinks is best isn't necesarrily better. Situations from the ouside is always easier to look/spectate be less involved. This behaviour isn't something you can change, that is your character. Would take a lot and a lot of effort while not really helping you, its that drive that makes you standout (for good and for worse)I have a few thoughts on Remco's behavior over the last few days.
First of all, on the TTT, that was absurd on the part of the organizers. Yes, if sunny and it was likely going to be, the light would have been fine and worked well on TV. Clearly it was way too dark during the last few teams' rides, and it was dumb and dangerous. So I get why he and others were pissed. They should have been.
What I don't like is that as a leader, I want him (or any other leader) to be the calm in the storm, not adding to it. Be the thermostat, not the thermometer. Set the tone. Calm your teammates and focus them on the task at hand. Maybe he's doing a lot of that, but I don't like to see him losing it at the end of the stage. Yes, say your piece and give the organization the business, but do it in a more measured, more effective way. Ranting is not a sign of leadership. Sometimes you have to, but it should be intentional. He's just reacting.
Today his first reaction was to again blame someone else for his problem. While there MAY be a small case to be made that folks were too close to the finish line, he had plenty of time to stop. Totally his fault, and his first reaction is to start complaining. Take responsibility. Admit when you make mistakes, and laugh about your own stupidity. That's what I want from a leader, not more blaming and controversy. Take responsibility even if it's not your fault. You're the leader of the team and now the race.
I like the kid, he's got spirit, and I like the way he rides. He rides like a freaking champion, he gives his all and I like a certain amount of emotion. His celebration today told me he's got a lot of feeling about this race, and he rode a smart, powerful, and impressive race. I don't want him neutered, I want him to be a leader.
He's got some growing to do, and maybe he can adjust his behavior. But his first inclinations are still immature. Just dial it back a bit and focus that energy into getting your team fired up, cared for, and behind you. Still to focused on himself in times of stress. When he's calm he says and does the right things.
Thanks for this, its awesome!Be the thermostat, not the thermometer.
You only see his first reactions in the press and in front of the camera. Remco is a hothead in / just after the race, but he is very laid-back out of the race (that's first hand info btw).I have a few thoughts on Remco's behavior over the last few days.
First of all, on the TTT, that was absurd on the part of the organizers. Yes, if sunny and it was likely going to be, the light would have been fine and worked well on TV. Clearly it was way too dark during the last few teams' rides, and it was dumb and dangerous. So I get why he and others were pissed. They should have been.
What I don't like is that as a leader, I want him (or any other leader) to be the calm in the storm, not adding to it. Be the thermostat, not the thermometer. Set the tone. Calm your teammates and focus them on the task at hand. Maybe he's doing a lot of that, I certainly don't know what all goes on behind the scenes. But I don't like to see him losing it at the end of the stage in public like that. Yes, say your piece and give the organization the business, but do it in a more measured, more effective way. Ranting is not a sign of leadership. Sometimes you have to speak out bluntly and directly, but it should be intentional. He's just reacting.
Today his first reaction was to again blame someone else for his problem. While there MAY be a small case to be made that folks were too close to the finish line, he had plenty of time to stop. Totally his fault, and his first reaction is to start complaining. Take responsibility. Admit when you make mistakes, and laugh about your own stupidity. That's what I want from a leader, not more blaming and controversy. Take responsibility even if it's not your fault. You're the leader of the team and now the race.
I like the kid a lot, he's got spirit, and I like the way he rides. He rides like a freaking champion, he gives his all and I like a certain amount of emotion. His celebration today told me he's got a lot of feeling about this race, and he rode a smart, powerful, and impressive race. I don't want him neutered, I want him to be a leader.
He's got some growing to do, and maybe he can adjust his behavior. But his first inclinations when he's stressed are still immature. Just dial it back a bit and focus that energy into getting your team fired up, cared for, and behind you. He's still too focused on himself in times of stress. When he's calm he says and does the right things.
Yes, I gave my opinion, and others will have their own. All good, it's subjective and I won't argue with someone who has another POV on Remco or leadership. But I'm pretty experienced with leading teams and have strong opinions.I think people differ in behaviour and what one thinks is best isn't necesarrily better.
Yeah thank you, I got that actually from a football (American) coach years ago, and it really seems to resonate whenever I drop that one. I think it makes the point beautifully. Can recall several meetings with leaders reporting to me when I've used that and it does always seem to land.Thanks for this, its awesome!
80% Remco's fault 20% Organizer's
I agree and acknowledged both these points in the post to which you're responding.You only see his first reactions in the press and in front of the camera. Remco is a hothead in / just after the race, but he is very laid-back out of the race (that's first hand info btw).