Teams & Riders The Remco Evenepoel is the next Eddy Merckx thread

Page 927 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
The amount of riders you see dropping back through the peloton on the approach for sprints, and other riders just riding around them. You don't hear of any complaints that the dropping riders should veer way out of their way so they can have a clear run to the line. That would be a bit dangerous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Salvarani
Mar 11, 2023
110
132
1,030
The incident with Tim Declercq is closed. The reason they lost 40 s in the TTT in the last part, was due to the weather (maybe in combination with a furious start). Remco is Remco... He should manage his emotions after bad results in a better way. Can't believe Tim to do such a thing on purpose. Just unfortunate...

Regarding the helmets, I totally agree with Remco. It's *** to change the rules after hard work and research by riders, teams, manufacturers,.. The sock makes sure the helmet is kept in the right position. So what?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmdirt and Wvv
I see there's still some confusion about the incident with Declercq.

Declercq has explained it already himself though.

He said that at a certain point he was told that the Quick-Step riders were 500 metres behind him. Before the corners that followed he looked behind but couldn't see them yet. Then he got into the corners and since they were riding 20-30km/h faster than him, suddenly they were behind him in the corners but there was nowhere he could go at that point. He also said that the motard in front of him should have signalled it that they were right behind him.

So he did actually hinder the Quick-Step guys a bit but he definitely didn't do it intentionally. He said it were unfortunate circumstances but he also feels a bit bad about it.

The thing he couldn't accept was that Remco (in his first reaction) seemed to insinuate that Declercq might have done it on purpose. Remco has however since apologized personally for those words and for both of them the case is closed and there are no more hard feelings.
 
Journalist: ‘Hello rider, what is your take away from the stage you just finished?’
Rider: *answers question, shares thoughts*

How dare he? 😡
?

Content of thoughts publicly announced can be evaluated, even disapproved, by the audience. No one questions his right to answer the question, they question his answer to the question.
 
Last edited:
Remco has however since apologized personally for those words and for both of them the case is closed and there are no more hard feelings.
090c7a7e-dbaa-11ee-b483-02b7b76bf47f.jpg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jmdirt
Remco-splaining will reach a whole other level. Just earlier today in Danish cycling twitter, I saw some Belgian rando lecturing on the proper interpretation of Evenepoel (I guess he had no problem interpreting Danish):

View: https://twitter.com/Puncheur_music/status/1765749411240407485
I threw it in Google Translate, it was very poorly translated, but if he means that Evenepoel wanted to say that Skjelmose only got past him because he didn’t see him, that’s bs.