Logic might be your friend, but maths isn't.I guess you could say, from a statistical point of view, you could argue there is 1 in 3 chances Remco comes back as strong as before. In that case he has a 100% chance of winning. If he does not come back as strong as he was before, the other 2 out of 3 chances are devided between Bernal, Yates, Vlasov, Carthy... and as such, Remco has the biggest chance to win... if you know what i mean. So statistically you could argue that he has a bigger chance to win than Bernal or Yates, even if the chance that he doesn't even make the top 20, is also a lot bigger than that of Bernal or Yates. Not sure this is the reasoning behind his decision, but it could be. How anyone would divide the odds is another thing ofcourse.
Last edited: