I presume it's more fun as a Belgian to be the star of a Belgian team, atmosphere wise. They are building the entire team around him, if Remco leaves they are royally ***
I guess he took them by surprise by winning the Vuelta so quick. It all really depends on what moves Lefevere is able to make this summer.Remco should have signed for Ineos instead of the miser Pat's team. I still find it surprising that the richest team isn’t able to sign the top 3 GT stars, Pogacar, Jonas, Remco. While the first 2 are well supported, Remco isnt.
2 weak reasons in my opinion. Making Remco nervous doesn't work for someone that is mentally strong and really believes in his own strength. Second reason is not something they take into account while racing.Still puzzled about the situation yesterday. On Flemish television (VTM), Wuyts and Bakelants were critizing INEOS as if they were pacing Remco and bringing him safe to the finishline (like teammates). Nobody felt like attacking at the pace they imposed.
BUT, I can see 2 reasons:
- Making Remco nervous by displaying the weakness of his team.
- A bit far-fetched perhaps, but showing that Remco would be a better fit at Ineos also crossed my mind for a while
Anyway, good that the SQS can "rest" for a few days.
If you don't focus on your opponents you will lose. Because in the end Roglic and Remco are individually stronger than any rider of INEOS. So you need strategy and multiple people from your team to win from them. So sure, they can create a steady pace on every mountain, but then you won't win.Here’s a thought. INEOS rode the way they did because it was good for INEOS, in that they were riding to keep a high pace and discourage attacks on their guy (Thomas) who prefers a steady pace. Imagine a tactic having nothing to do with Remco?
What about Bahrain riders? Or are they included in the dog category?Dogs cause 9% of all crashes
Have they done it in every mountain? If they do I’m with you.If you don't focus on your opponents you will lose. Because in the end Roglic and Remco are individually stronger than any rider of INEOS. So you need strategy and multiple people from your team to win from them. So sure, they can create a steady pace on every mountain, but then you won't win.
Have they done it in every mountain? If they do I’m with you.
Yeah, they do it a lot. Except when they don't, and the guys they have don't fit that tactic. Right now they have Thomas still rounding into form, and TGH who is...well TGH. Presumably they watch cycling and realize there's zero chance either guy is going to drop Remco, who is on incredible form, on a short steep section of less than 3k, 4 stages into a race. I would hope they are saving those bullets for later in the race, and hoping Remco starts to fall off a bit. If they do it the whole race, yes, that would be dumb.One hardly ever sees them doing anything else. That's the thing. One can usually find a reason why this is advantageous, but it doesn't look like they are capable of coming up with anything else. So, question is not "is this extremely dumb and not called for at all", but "are there, in certain situations, maybe better options? And can they, with some flexibility, decide on the best tactics depending on certain race situations and circumstances? And it doesn't look like they can. Or dare.
I agree, it's still a long way to Rome so more than enough time to play their cards properly. Laurens De Plus also said that they just found that it wasn't worth it because it would only be a performance of 15min, not enough to create proper differences.Have they done it in every mountain? If they do I’m with you.
100%.I agree, it's still a long way to Rome so more than enough time to play their cards properly. Laurens De Plus also said that they just found that it wasn't worth it because it would only be a performance of 15min, not enough to create proper differences.
But if they are thinking about G as the leader, he doesn't have the best crash record.Just waiting until Remco and Roglic crash out looks to be the best tactic for the Ineos team.
Indeed, just saw this communication on Twitter. This does not look too good. Reminds me of last year's Vuelta.
He was definitely at fault, but so was Kirsch. Evenepoel's fault was that he did not look to the side he wanted to move into. I don't really understand how that happened as it is something that you should do instinctively. If you ride like that in traffic, you're dead within a week.Stay focused until the end - that's the lesson here. Keep your eyes on the road in front of you. The crash - in my opinion - is not only his fault (Kirsch line was too aggressive), but it was likely avoidable.