I think he just waists too much energy on a circuit like today when he has to ride in the bunch because of his bike handling skills.
Sure, but he never wins gold so we can take him out of the pool of possible winnersWVA is riding the TT and i think he was really good today.. (as understatement)
There was a conversation a while back about Evenepoel's ITT superiority over a longer distance. This World ITT is just under 48km, so it'll be an interesting case study for future reference (like in a GT 'if' the organisers decide to reintroduce long ITT's again in the coming years).
Its a different situation though. Esp in 3rd week of GT when Skeletor still has fresh as daisy wattage.
He said he lost energy due to the succession of short uphill sprints. He lost places as he was doing 200 watt less than the punchy riders on these short climbs. If he could attack he could caverage out his efforts better. In any case, on this circuit with almost no long stretches to get in a decent pace it would have been very difficult. So it ended up as a battle between the best punchers of the world.I think he just waists too much energy on a circuit like today when he has to ride in the bunch because of his bike handling skills.
Unless his result today was due to him Saving himself for the ITT I wouldn't take the current state of affairs as favoring him or Wout. Someone else will be fresher and surprise us.Evenepoel should be heavily favored over Van Aert in the ITT IMO
Bruh if Evenepoel ends up beating WvA for 1st by just a few seconds...Evenepoel should be heavily favored over Van Aert in the ITT IMO
What was he referring to?Evenepoel: “It is distressing that, despite a good period, something negative always has to come up. It's like I can never do anything right. That hurts a bit, but that's the life that was given to me from the beginning of my career with the pros."
I don't base it on the road race at all. They've correlated pretty poorly on past WCs IMO.Unless his result today was due to him Saving himself for the ITT I wouldn't take the current state of affairs as favoring him or Wout. Someone else will be fresher and surprise us.
RvV should be less technical, but it's still a big problem. Sanremo too.I always feared the circuit was going to be too technical for Remco to be able to win but his cornering/positioning was worse than I thought (or hoped). I thought he had made more progression in that regard the past years.
Does this say anything about his chances for a potential RVV bid (given that the first four of this WC are basically always the main protagonists in the RVV)? I know there are obviously many more moments in the RVV where he can unleash his strengths but my main worry remains his positioning which is crucial in a hectic RVV.
tough to say. the lad is still only 23 so I wouldn't rule him out as a future Flanders winner. He needs to work on those aspects of his game for sure, but that is also possible.I always feared the circuit was going to be too technical for Remco to be able to win but his cornering/positioning was worse than I thought (or hoped). I thought he had made more progression in that regard the past years.
Does this say anything about his chances for a potential RVV bid (given that the first four of this WC are basically always the main protagonists in the RVV)? I know there are obviously many more moments in the RVV where he can unleash his strengths but my main worry remains his positioning which is crucial in a hectic RVV.
His cornering and bikehandling skills being too weak to defend his title?What was he referring to?
Think he was referring to how his achievements are always overshadowed by something negative. ie the transfer dramaWhat was he referring to?
To those who have questioned the merits of calling him Bambi, I think yesterday proved why it makes sense.To expand: Bambi is not avoiding risks. Bambi is not even particularly afraid. Bambi on ice is out of his element. Bambi is not a natural, Bambi is awkward.
Is it legitimate to mock a rider for being a Bambi? Absolutely. If you may praise a rider for having skills and for being a natural (see MvdP and Sagan), the flip side is that you may mock those who lack those qualities. Just as other riders, like Froome, have been mocked for the qualities they lacked.
The tragic death of another rider is completely irrelevant to that.
And that's such a weird reasoning. It's one thing to praise someone, it's a whole other thing to mock someone who can't be praised for something ... that has nothing to do with being the flip side and says more about you than about the rider you're trying to mock.Is it legitimate to mock a rider for being a Bambi? Absolutely. If you may praise a rider for having skills and for being a natural (see MvdP and Sagan), the flip side is that you may mock those who lack those qualities. Just as other riders, like Froome, have been mocked for the qualities they lacked.
If you read his comments you would understand that he had issues with the succession of explosive climbs. He was not outclassed due to lack of technical skills. He doesn't have the technical skills of WVA or MVDP but Pogi neither.To those who have questioned the merits of calling him Bambi, I think yesterday proved why it makes sense.
Pogi on the other hand could fend for himself and easily get in position and around the course.
I see no reason to treat Evenepoels post race interview as gospel here. He's not gonna wanna highlight and shout out to the world that "Hey my cornering, positioning and descending still sucks"If you read his comments you would understand that he had issues with the succession of explosive climbs. He was not outclassed due to lack of technical skills. He doesn't have the technical skills of WVA or MVDP but Pogi neither.
If you read his comments you would understand that he had issues with the succession of explosive climbs. He was not outclassed due to lack of technical skills. He doesn't have the technical skills of WVA or MVDP but Pogi neither.