The amount of lies surrounding Remco is insane.
Just will leave here some hot takes:
1. Remco is pretty honest in his interviews. Even 3 days ago, he said ECRR was more important than the WCRR because he lost to Pogacar in the RR, when he said he wanted to peak for Worlds after his Tour's disappointing performance.
2. His 2nd change of bikes in Kigali.
3. His "broken rib" and suboptimal preparation in the Tour after saying he was in great shape before the Dauphiné
4. Blaming his team for his poor performance in LBL
I wanted to break it down one by one, because you don't seem to have all the details, or deliberately trying to put a negative spotlight on Evenepoel.
1. He wanted to peak for this whole period. You don't peak for a single race, when you have 5 major races in a timespan of 3 weeks. He peaked for WC ITT - Lombardia. If he actually feels UEC RR is more important than WC RR, I don't know. That's not a lie, that's an opinion. I doubt that's the case though. WC RR is just more important. Although he really does have a thing for finishing bingo cards, so I would also not be surprised if he would prefer to finish this one now.
2. What is a lie here? He said there was an issue with his saddle, because that's how it felt for him during the race. So that's what he said immediately after the race. Staff said everything was fine. So Evenepoel afterwards said he was in the wrong, bike was fine, and it was probably in his head or his body due to the old bike being wrong and body needed time to adjust again.
3. Broken rib happened during NC, has nothing to do with Dauphine. Nonetheless this was indeed a lie, because his training didn't even go well. Is it normal for a athlete to say beforehand he isn't feeling good? Thinking you might grow into the GT, and thus by saying you are not feeling good give the possibility for your competitors to attack you early on? I don't think so. So it makes sense to say he is feeling good. You don't give free opportunities to your competitors.
4. Even though this is not something I believe you should do in interviews. He was right. His team performance wasn't good. They didn't keep him in the proper position. Evenepoel himself was also not good, but neither was his team. So not sure why this is a lie. Evenepoel himself said he wasn't good during Liege, he never said he lost Liege due to his team.