So if he had only started his sprint later, you think he rode the last 3 km the right way to win?Yes. He showed that multiple times that it worked.
So if he had only started his sprint later, you think he rode the last 3 km the right way to win?Yes. He showed that multiple times that it worked.
Depending on the result, yes. If he rode the perfect sprint and still lost, then you can say he rode the last 3km's wrong and a different tactic should have been used. But if he rode the perfect sprint, and won, it might have been thanks to pulling those last 3km's, keeping the pace high, and not giving the others time to recuperate more.So if he had only started his sprint later, you think he rode the last 3 km the right way to win?
Was that the situation? Same distance to finish? Same distance to peloton?If pulling on the flat with others in his wheel is good for Evenepoel, should he then have continued in the gravel stage last year in the Tour to pull Vingegaard without expecting any pulls from him?
Does pulling on the flat with Pogi and Vingegaard in his wheel cook them or not? If he can cook them like that, why not do it for 80 km?Was that the situation? Same distance to finish? Same distance to peloton?
It needs to be rolling terrain, and the race needs to be long and hard.Does pulling on the flat with Pogi and Vingegaard in his wheel cook them or not? If he can cook them like that, why not do it for 80 km?
You understand, when there are two, only one of them can sit in your wheel, right?Does pulling on the flat with Pogi and Vingegaard in his wheel cook them or not? If he can cook them like that, why not do it for 80 km?
So if he tolerated Vingegaard, he gets to cook Pogi? That sounds like a successful strategy for the overall victory to ride against the biggest favourite like that.You understand, when there are two, only one of them can sit in your wheel, right?
lol, sure. Great strategy in case Visma pays him.So if he tolerated Vingegaard, he gets to cook Pogi? That sounds like a successful strategy for the overall victory to ride against the biggest favourite like that.
If it works, that is.
And that he obviously would've been able to follow Pogacar/Ayuso/Del Toro on Mont KigaliToday we confirmed Remco bike handling/descending should not be much of a worry anymore.
I don't agree. He really was pushing to drop Storer and keep Del Toro behind, sprinting from hairpin to hairpin, while he did not come closer to Pogacar. Imho that is a big part of the reason why Pogacar was able to cruise away from him on the flat, because he went deep on the climb and the descent because he had to drop Seixas, Del Toro and Storer when he still could. It wasn't bad by any means, but Pog did that descent just as quickly much more conservatively.Today we confirmed Remco bike handling/descending should not be much of a worry anymore.
Like from the top of Ganda to Bergamo?It needs to be rolling terrain, and the race needs to be long and hard.
No he didn't. Pogacar cooked himself. Very strong Evenepoel caught him. 8km to go. Tried to go past and their Pogacar had trouble for a moment. And then? They lost 10" or so to the group behind... There was absolutely ZERO cooking going on there. The cooking was the chase, which was impressive enough. Why try to make it something else? And he certainly didn't cook Skjelmose who was in Remco's wheel for way longer and at a higher tempo than Pogacar.Not a myth, showed this at AGR.
I don't agree. He really was pushing to drop Storer and keep Del Toro behind, sprinting from hairpin to hairpin, while he did not come closer to Pogacar. Imho that is a big part of the reason why Pogacar was able to cruise away from him on the flat, because he went deep on the climb and the descent because he had to drop Seixas, Del Toro and Storer when he still could. It wasn't bad by any means, but Pog did that descent just as quickly much more conservatively.
Yes, like i said, it wasn't bad by any means. But we have to wonder without going full on every straight section like he did, how much time would he have lost to Pog then? Let's say for argument's sake that he lost 45 seconds on a 9km descent to Pogacar with equal effort, would you still be saying his descending is not an issue anymore?I'm not saying he is a top descender. He ain't Nibali. But not one iffy moment. He looked stable, picking his lines well.
Yes, like i said, it wasn't bad by any means. But we have to wonder without going full on every straight section like he did, how much time would he have lost to Pog then? Let's say for argument's sake that he lost 45 seconds on a 9km descent to Pogacar with equal effort, would you still be saying his descending is not an issue anymore?
Didn't see him sprinting after every turn. As i said, imho that was why Pog was able to put 40s into Evenepoel on the flat after the descent.Pogacar was also going relative full.
Like when Simmons dropped? And eventually Storer?Like from the top of Ganda to Bergamo?
Didn't see him sprinting after every turn. As i said, imho that was why Pog was able to put 40s into Evenepoel on the flat after the descent.
Are we talking about one-day races? Then I certainly agree.Good pickup by Red Bull now that Rog is really not “there” any more. And cannot see Lipowitz getting anywhere close to Remoco in the last three weeks.