- Sep 12, 2022
- 8,398
- 9,848
- 17,180
Yeah, such a weak excuse that he crashed in december, and didn't build up a proper base.He won't have an excuse this season unless the blind faithful conjure up a defense.
Yeah, such a weak excuse that he crashed in december, and didn't build up a proper base.He won't have an excuse this season unless the blind faithful conjure up a defense.
Better crashing hard in AprilYeah, such a weak excuse that he crashed in december, and didn't build up a proper base.
I’d argue Pogacar’s mistake was believing he was stronger than Jumbo especially with his showboating during the stage he got one two TKO punched.Cause Pogacar does not need tactics. He's that strong. Has great bike handling/positioning and has that strong of a team to back him up as well.
Also even Pogacar has had a few (tactical) mistakes, and they tend to happen when he was not sure he was stronger than the rest. Tdf 22, Paris Roubaix, WC 22 come to mind.
So I am still not convinced of BMI as being a better indicator of climbing than simply watts per kilo. I think BMI is just an assumed truth in cycling circles. A rider who is shorter but stockier can have similarly low bodyfat % as riders like Vingegaard. As I said at the beginning, the physics of climbing doesn't care about appearance. It only cares about sustained watts per kilo.
Prior to his 19th birthday (and prior to turning pro) his VO2max was measured at 85. An article mentioned he weighted 61 kg at that time but his weight measurements are always been all over the place so it was likely a few kg more if you see pictures of him then vs now. So better training and a lower fat % has probably increased it to about 90. That looks like a reasonable number.I never implied it. You misunderstood me. Obviously w/kg is a direct measure of power per mass and climbing ability. My point was to explain why there's an inverse relation between BMI and relative VO2max and therefore, why the best climbers are usually cyclists with very low BMI. Obviously it case of top sportsmen it's more blurred (as all of them have very low fat mass and low BMI). So, besides BMI related factors (bone and fat mass, height-related stuff) there are others non-related to BMI (like muscles composition, metabolism) which strongly affect VO2max (and therefore w/kg).
As for Remco's VO2max, it could be around 90 (when he's closer to 60 kg, not to 65 kg).
Especially uphill, you seem to be fighting an unequal battle against Pogacar. It’s admirable that you don’t give up. But how on earth do you ever close that gap?
Evenepoel: “Through specific training sessions at extremely high intensity. In recent years, because of crashes, injuries, rehabilitation and a lack of a solid base, I’ve barely been able to do those, rarely or never. After a proper, trouble-free winter, I really want to put serious work into that now. If I manage that, it’s quite possible I’ll take two or even three steps forward compared to last season.”
If he takes two or three steps forward compared to 2025 season, maybe he reach Paris.What I think was most important in that latest interview with Evenpoel was the following section. Basically confirming what some of us in this thread were also saying. At least he ha the same hope as the fans in this thread, that he will still be able to actually compete with Pogacar.
New theory just dropped. 3 time World ITT champion hasn't done high intensity training for years.
It never ends.
![]()
"I thought about it in the shower today," says an ambitious, improved, and fitter Evenepoel: "Remco is flying again"
Remco Evenepoel is eager to compete in the Tour de France. The 25-year-old Belgian from Soudal-Quick Step embarked on a rollercoaster ride over a year ago, which left him feeling sad, euphoric, angry,...www.idlprocycling.com
But if I had to choose between this year's situation and last year's, I'd choose this year. His basic condition is okay. It's now a matter of those last few percent."
Like clockworkNew theory just dropped. 3 time World ITT champion hasn't done high intensity training for years.
I agree that he needs to ride tactically and that would include surfing the attacks of #2,3 threats just to advance through the peloton. He tends to a)sit on Pogacar's wheel and suffer when Pogi puts a dig in when terrain favors him b) watch other attacks he could attach to with very little effort to get a gap. Sometimes it appears he knows that he just lacks that jump and concedes to a tactical tempo. That's OK and he should now know what training is necessary to be responsive if it's important to his GT goals.Cause Pogacar does not need tactics. He's that strong. Has great bike handling/positioning and has that strong of a team to back him up as well.
Also even Pogacar has had a few (tactical) mistakes, and they tend to happen when he was not sure he was stronger than the rest. Tdf 22, Paris Roubaix, WC 22 come to mind.
Every rider outside of Pogacar needs to ride tactically to a certain degree. Remco probably needs to ride less tactically than most of his rivals. That said, I have no clue what you are talking about in this second quote. i'm thinking you're confusing races. or mixing them up. I'm not sure.
In any case, remco is considered one of the big dogs. They all look at him, try to eat his plate. We'll see if or when Lipo gets the same status how he responds. One thing to ride as an underdog that people give less attention to, another to ride as one of the main favourites in every race you turn up to.
As for Lipo not getting as much attention till now, it's cause he was only starting to ride results people pay attention to halfway 2024. He's also not that young relative speaking.
It would be relevant to demonstrate how, in spite of your opinion that Lipowitz is tactically challenged: he still finishes ahead. Is he that much stronger or just tactically better than Remco? I think both.How is that relevant at all to what I said?
Seems like the question is what he means by “extremely” high intensity workouts.New theory just dropped. 3 time World ITT champion hasn't done high intensity training for years.
And I think neitherIt would be relevant to demonstrate how, in spite of your opinion that Lipowitz is tactically challenged: he still finishes ahead. Is he that much stronger or just tactically better than Remco? I think both.
That's what we hope he's able to do: stay healthy and complete a season of serious preparation.What I think was most important in that latest interview with Evenpoel was the following section. Basically confirming what some of us in this thread were also saying. At least he ha the same hope as the fans in this thread, that he will still be able to actually compete with Pogacar.
Okay. I think the line is blurred on BMI in Remco’s case.I never implied it. You misunderstood me. Obviously w/kg is a direct measure of power per mass and climbing ability. My point was to explain why there's an inverse relation between BMI and relative VO2max and therefore, why the best climbers are usually cyclists with very low BMI. Obviously it case of top sportsmen it's more blurred (as all of them have very low fat mass and low BMI). So, besides BMI related factors (bone and fat mass, height-related stuff) there are others non-related to BMI (like muscles composition, metabolism) which strongly affect VO2max (and therefore w/kg).
As for Remco's VO2max, it could be around 90 (when he's closer to 60 kg, not to 65 kg).
And might improve due to different training methods.And who can say Remco can’t improve on his 2024 TdF climbing level? He is still only 25.
And might improve due to different training methods.
Remco has age on his side vs Vinge though. There is a chance Remco could improve a little bit in new environment. That it could be really close sooner rather than later. Question is if it will be enough.@Cookster15
"Obviously Pogacar was at an unreachable level but Remco was close to Vingo on some big mountain stages"
My problem with this is that Remco didn't raise his level to Jonas level, Jonas dropped to Remco level. So when both are at their top level, the difference is still big
The flaw in your logic is the rest of the GC field that Remco beat. Remco was better than Almeida and Landa. Carlos Rodriguez and Adam Yates are handy climbers too. As for Jonas, sure his level dropped late in the 3rd week except Jonas did his best ever watts on PdB on stage 15 and Remco still beat Pantanis record by a minute.@Cookster15
"Obviously Pogacar was at an unreachable level but Remco was close to Vingo on some big mountain stages"
My problem with this is that Remco didn't raise his level to Jonas level, Jonas dropped to Remco level. So when both are at their top level, the difference is still big
Based on what? Relative to Pogacar maybe, but that's because Pogacar became much better. But still everyone improved. Vingegaard improved compared to 2022-2023. So not sure why you say Jonas dropped his level.My problem with this is that Remco didn't raise his level to Jonas level, Jonas dropped to Remco level.
But I heard Remco hasn't improved since the 2022 VueltaBased on what? Relative to Pogacar maybe, but that's because Pogacar became much better. But still everyone improved. Vingegaard improved compared to 2022-2023. So not sure why you say Jonas dropped his level.
We're talking specifically about Tour 2024. First mountain stages, the difference was big. Late stages, Remco got much closer. But not because he improved throughout the race but because Jonas's level dropped due to bad preparationBased on what? Relative to Pogacar maybe, but that's because Pogacar became much better. But still everyone improved. Vingegaard improved compared to 2022-2023. So not sure why you say Jonas dropped his level.
