Netserk said:
So was it a first for doping, or a first for epo?
Well, the laziness of the media is much of the problem in this whole mess.
CN, like the Detroit Free Press (I hope to god it is free), both cite what Hincapie says in
The Armstrong Lie.
Hincapie talks about how Andreu taught him how to use EPO
The DFP quotes Big George as saying,
“Frankie was my mentor in the peloton,” Hincapie says,
referring to the the group of cyclists he rode with. “For me, it was a powerful moment that I won’t forget. It was like, ‘Oh, now I’m going to have to do that, too.’
http://www.freep.com/article/20140202/COL26/302020040/Betsy-Andreu-Lance-Armstrong
(I've bolded the part that indicates the target audience expected by that article.)
But somehow, from that, Laura Weislo at CN extrapolates,
"Frankie was my mentor in the peloton," Hincapie said, and talked about the first time he chose to use illegal performance-enhancing drugs.
There are more than a few problems with that.
First off, where and when did Hincapie ever suggest to anyone that he hadn't been using PEDs prior to seeing EPO in Frankie's fridge? On one hand, that inadvertently plays to Hincapie's favor by suggesting, or at least implying, that he was a good, clean American athlete up until that fateful moment of no return as he gazed past the leftover lasagna towards his future. (I wonder if, in that same moment, he pictured an overpriced getaway in the hills of South Carolina?).
On the other hand, it's both careless and sloppy reporting. It paints Frankie in a more significant light as the bad influence in poor George's life and illustrious career than is warranted. Maybe because there was a deadline to meet, that line about "the first time he chose to use illegal performance-enhancing drugs" was thrown in without too much consideration. Or maybe it was deliberately put there to obfuscate the truth. Or maybe this is just a good example of how history gets poisoned.
Quotes are taking from quotes, a word or turn of a phrase is slightly altered, and then things become blurry...and eventually toxic. It could easily be argued that that is exactly what Lance & Co are hoping for when they set things in motion to begin with. Plant a seed and it just may grow in one's favor. Or maybe not.
The press is lazy and people are stupid. So it doesn't take much for
any story to get distorted. We can argue endlessly as to who the puppet master is, and as to what agendas may or may not be playing out behind-the-scenes. But in the end, we'd be foolish not to look at
who has a history of doing
what, and to examine, closely, the means by which any of the information is made available to us.
I believe the point that Chewie is making above is that regardless of the intentions, those words "the first time he chose to use illegal performance-enhancing drugs" are out there, for anyone to see, and they clearly read as: The first time George Hincapie chose to use illegal performance-enhancing drugs was when he saw EPO in Frankie Andreu's refrigerator.
Once that is is print, it hardly matters what George actually said. The quote gets repeated and some people will assume it to be accurate. It's been my interpretation through this current tug-of-war between Race Radio and BroDeal that the only real issue is: What are the
intentions behind what is being said.
Race Radio seems to want to argue that the distortions are all very intentional.
BroDeal seems to want to argue that a literal interpretation of affidavits will prove things otherwise.
The problem in all of that is that the two issues would seem to be separate, and in a way that no amount of "debate" is going to solve. Race Radio's fears are confirmed by things like that CN article. BroDeal will point out the discrepancies between what CN prints and what George actually states. Nevertheless, CN
did print that. But it
does differ from George's affidavit.
And so here we are. But I've no idea where that is anymore.