Re: Re:
More obsfucation.
We get it. You big sky fan. :lol:
macbindle said:Benotti69 said:macbindle said:Benotti69 said:Sky really fired one across the sports bows with the 1500 page document.
A warning of do not mess with us or we will **** you up.
Even more reason to want to see them gone from the sport.
How is a 1500 page document going to **** anybody up? It's not an attack, its a defence. Why do you assume that they might not actually have a strong case? There are some very well-conducted studies that call into question the basis of the Salbutamol test. Who are you, and what specialist knowledge do you have, that refutes these studies?
Something evidence based please, not your usual faith-based responses.
Faith based....hahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaha
Only the team that apparently reinvented the sport with marginal gains could find a legitimate fault with a test that has banned lots of athletes!
Again, when a team and its riders in this sport do the unbelievable and constantly contradict themselves trying to explain that unbeievabilty away people want to shoot the 'skeptics'.
I dont need to refute anything. Sky/Froome has plenty of evidence pointing to doping/cheating/motors.
Anyone who still thinks Sky do it clean should be avoided.
Your entire post is irrelevant.
You have answered a question I haven't asked and just slipped into your usual 'one-size-fits-all' answer.
I'm haven't asked you whether you think Sky dopes.
I know what you think. You post the same thing in most of your posts.
I asked you SPECIFICALLY about the Salbutamol case.
I'll highlight the questions in my post above and let's see if you can actually manage to answer them. There are 3 of them.
More obsfucation.
We get it. You big sky fan. :lol: