no but it makes me hell nervourszzacht said:Being biased doesn't change the fact that your point was a good one.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
no but it makes me hell nervourszzacht said:Being biased doesn't change the fact that your point was a good one.
RhodriM said:I'd like to think Sastre just chose his moment well, but at the same time find it hard to believe that the top 20 were all clean.
wait. how do we know that those who tested negative are clean. they only tested for cera but the guys couldof been using transfusions or something not yet detectable. we only know for sure three four names from that list. i recall rabobank released their riders and evans was mentioned.sportzchick said:oh no I agree Rhod - im not stupid to think that
Okay Im biased having my favoirte rider, my hero in that group but the sport needs to clear clean riders just as much as they have to expose cheats
sportzchick said:im niether - kinda irrate and upset
Weve put lists of 40 riders and those who are innocent out of that group are tarnished with the same brush as the cheats
Like I said release the 17 riders who are clean
I guess - I just wanna know dammitCerberus said:I wouldn't want my name published if I was one of the 17. They haven't been cleared on anything except possibly CERA and they still have abnormal blood values. That's not news I'd like to share with the world regardless of whether my abnormal blood values were caused by doping or not.
sportzchick said:I guess - I just wanna know dammit
Cerberus said:I wouldn't want my name published if I was one of the 17. They haven't been cleared on anything except possibly CERA and they still have abnormal blood values. That's not news I'd like to share with the world regardless of whether my abnormal blood values were caused by doping or not.
Galic Ho said:Considering the hype behind this thread I feel a tad defeated. It may seem trivial, but I wanted someone caught, not necessarily big name, but someone. Kohl, Ricco, Schumacher and Piepoli couldn't have been all the bad eggs from 2008. Okay, time for the feds to invent that HGH and autologous test and release it on an unsuspecting peloton. Anyday now.....
iainf72 said:I recall this story at the time was exposed as made up nonsense. Cadel posted on his own page (in english) to confirm he only works with Sassi and hadn't worked with the myth.
there is a vast aray of riders who have fans on here that many are panicking a bit - i know i amCerberus said:I'm a bit curious to. In any case I find the news slightly depressing, if 40 out of around 60 riders have abnormal blood values, then it seems to me "abnormalities" are shockingly normal. Perhaps some abnormalities are cause by something genuinly abnormal, but the majority? To me it indicates that the sport might very well be (almost) as dirty as it used to be.
wait. what kind of logic is that. if i was the afld and knew a freshly caught doper is on the list of suspects why would i want to waste those expensive reagents and my lab time.iainf72 said:Not even Astarloza? That's a pretty hopeless effort Pierre.
python said:wait. what kind of logic is that. if i was the afld and knew a freshly caught doper is on the list of suspects why would i want to waste those expensive reagents and my lab time.
isn't it a pure waste when a juicier target is in view.
Cerberus said:Hardly, another positive would shot a big gaping hole in his "altitude tent" defense and possibly save them an expesive trial. Plus I think thye can ban him twice with 2 positives. Money well spent IMO.
python said:wait. what kind of logic is that. if i was the afld and knew a freshly caught doper is on the list of suspects why would i want to waste those expensive reagents and my lab time.
isn't it a pure waste when a juicier target is in view.
again there is no sound rationale to waste resources on testing astarloza a dead horse. this was not a research project. last year was different. very different. first they had an unreliable urine test for cera that was applied to several riders multiple times. then by the end of the tour they perfected the blood test for cera and netted kohl and schumacker. this is your explanation. labs don't waste their resources because some forum members desire so.iainf72 said:If they did test him, and he came back negative, how much faith would you have in their testing? It's pretty clear MA should've come back positive. Unless he only did it that one time....
And the AFLD retested some positives with the CERA blood test last year, n'est pas?
python said:astaloza admitted after his b positive. there is no defense there will be no trial. guilty as charged with an idiotic explanation. also why would french waste their time and stick their noses in the essentially spanish affair. coni they are not.
correction: he did not admit but his explanation is stupid.