airstream
BANNED
- Mar 29, 2011
- 5,122
- 0
- 0
GJB123 said:Yes, and your point is?
In my view, you hugely absolutize natural talent. A man is not born being a GT rider. He becomes a GT rider. All top level riders (I mean 15-20 main stars) are very talented. One is a bit more talented, other is a bit less. Why one has talent for something and other has talent in no way for the same thing is beyond me.
And then a rider often finds himself in cycling and progresses. That is all about hidden talents. For instance, Voeckler lost to Lance about 4 mins at Plateau de Beille in 2004. It characterized him, a 24 years old then rider, as a brilliant climber, considering he never practised climbing purposefully. But anyways he decided to remain a breakaway rider with good reason just because he felt it suited him more. However, he has developed in all aspects during those years and when Voeckler heroically survived in the Pyrenees in the 2011 Tour, I was shocked in no way. Sure, Lance's and Wiggins' cases are fraught with even more changes. But I don't get why you refuse riders in their right to improve and widen their skills?
Naturally we drop a doping factor. It's cycling and all the best on something, but even there you show up with yardstick of 'just doping' (Contador maybe Evans I dont' know) and 'extreme doping' (Wiggins, Froome, Armstrong). It is very difficult to understand.
Basso couldn't do that without Riis, Wiggins - without Vaughters, Contador - without Bruyneel and so on. How do you think Contador would have won the 2007 Tour if he had ridden say for Caisse d'Epargne?LA never was a top-level GT-contender until he got on the USPS/Bruyneel/Ferrari-train. That you fail to recognize that, is simply beyond believe.
