No, but this kind of character assassination is uncalled-for. Anytime Wiebes appears in a race it's how about she's the devil incarnate for breaking a contract at some point. I mean, I'm not necessarily a fan of Wiebes, although I do like her transformation to almost more of a puncheur, but this is just malicious.
And the comparison to Lance and OJ kind of proves my point...
The comparison to Lance and OJ was
a) not made by me
b) an example of the reductio ad absurdum argument.
The argument being presented was that because she had done some good for her brother, that it was unfair to call her out on things she has done that are bad. That's why I raised the Mark Cavendish example. The Lance example is just a more extreme one because most people at this stage would obviously view Lance as bad because of all the things he did and the livelihoods he destroyed in protection of his cult of personality, and at this point invoking Lance is kind of cycling's equivalent to Godwin's Law.
I don't think nicknaming Wiebes "Little Miss Contract Law" is malicious. Especially not when she's done it twice - and insisted on a clause entitling her to do it again in later contracts. While loyalty may be fleeting, the way she did it rubbed a lot of people up the wrong way, and it's the kind of stigma that stays with people and makes them less attractive signings in future if they aren't talented enough to overcome it - fortunately for Lorena, she very much is.