- Jun 16, 2009
- 19,654
- 2
- 0
The Hitch said:This comment seemed different to me when i first read it![]()
I washed my mouth out with soap!
The Hitch said:This comment seemed different to me when i first read it![]()
Dekker_Tifosi said:Was there ANY question at all Hagen could handle the worlds course this year then???
That is new to me. If Hagen is ever going to find a tailor made course, it's this year.
A shame his team is sh.t and that the main opponents are attackers, like Gilbert and Pozzato. So he is going to either have to react to attacks himself or hope Spain gambles on Freire (who's not even certain yet)
Tactically it's not easy. The course is perfect for Hagen. Who could ever doubt that.
Dekker_Tifosi said:I don't think the 260km+ are going to be a problem this time around actually.
Last year I would have agreed with you (even won a €10 bet with Moondance because of that)
The Hitch said:Worlds 2010
Milan San Remo
Ronde van Vlaanderin
Paris Roubaix
do i need to go on?
hatcher said:Utter nonsense.
They were criticised in the cobble races for doing too much for Flecha, now apparently they did nothing.
EBH lost Vattenfall because Farrar was faster. He was going off the same leadout speed.
Eneco was lost because EBH decided to sit-up, rather than carry on with Martin and Morenhout.
This race was lost because EBH and others didn't react, and then left their kicks too late waiting for others. And for the record, Sky did have a 2nd man up there helping to pull back the Gesink group. I have no earthly idea what more you can expect a team to do for EBH.
El Pistolero said:He should prove him self in those kind of races first.
Sure he won Ghent-Wevelgem, but so did Hincapie.
maltiv said:I still think that the lack of tactical depth amongst the inexperienced DS's of Team Sky is one of the reasons why EBH hasn't had as much success as he should have had this year. I mean, he's a lot stronger in every aspect this year (stronger sprint, climbing and TT), yet his results are lacklustre. At Columbia they surely had extremely experienced staff who most likely played a vital role in EBH's successes in the 2009 season, as well as a stronger team in general.
Dekker_Tifosi said:Sky doesn't have the strenght, not much to do with tactics (well except for the early leadouts).
But to pull back a break with Hesjedal, Cunego, Gesink, Wegmann and Breschel, I don't think much teams would be able to do that regardless
velosiped said:Please, leave the alcohol in the closet.
what help did Flecha have the last 50 km's on any race?
Vattenfall was lost partly because of a slow leadout, partly because of a head-wind whish made Boasson wait as long as possibly before he sprinted. Farrar gambleded and went early, hit the wall, and barely managed to win. Had Boasson gone 10 metes earlier he would have won. Farrar has a good kangaroo-jump, but his top end speed in not better.
At Eneco he chose to let go because the peloton was about to get the break-away he was in. Why they suddenly decided to let Moorenhout and Martin is beyond me.
I expect the team with the best 1-2 sprinter to have a helper there in the finale when it's probable it will end in a group finish.
Reverend_T_Preedy said:Who's been drinking?
EBH lost out at Eneco due to inexperience, not because of a lack of team support. Similarly, he, and others, could have followed Voeckler when he attacked but they didn't. Again, inexperience they will learn from.
I assume you're going to criticise Quickstep for not supporting Boonen when Cancellara attacked at RVV?
Some people need to understand that certain riders are better on the day. It doesn't matter how good or bad the DS' are, when it comes down to the last km it's all about tactical awareness. Voeckler has proved time and time again he can do this.
velosiped said:Cycling is not about pause-clowns like Vockler.
velosiped said:Cycling is not about pause-clowns like Vockler.
velosiped said:Cycling is not about pause-clowns like Vockler.
tgsgirl said:Are you seriously dissing TiVo? Are you mental?!
Are you a frustrated Hesjedal fan or something?velosiped said:Do you think cycling is democracy; equal share of victory to the respective teams and riders?
Roger de Vlaeminck is bashing the sport for supporting to many mediocre plebs.
He is right. this is about the real winners. the big talents.
what we remember is the big guys, Mercx, de vlaemick, Kelly, Maertens, Raas, Hinault, Petegem, Museeuw, Boonen, Cippolini, Freire, Cancellara, Zabel etc.
Who the hell cares about nobodies like TiVo? He wins solely because others are sleeping!
Their victories are annoying.
Libertine Seguros said:Why not? Guys like TV Tommy bring something to the race, because they will try to break up the race and get a win in the only way they can, no matter how unlikely. What IS cycling about, if it's not about attacking to win?
Merry Trollmas.velosiped said:cycling is all about the battle of the titans. The midgets have no business being there.
Pfuh, what the heck kind of damage has postmodernistic relativism done with human brains? Supporting the mediocre?
theyoungest said:Are you a frustrated Hesjedal fan or something?
When did we last see 25 men in the finale at Flanders?
