karlboss said:I think we need some sort of cycling quotient basis.
That's a bit hard, considering California hasn't started yet.
karlboss said:I think we need some sort of cycling quotient basis.
issoisso said:That's a bit hard, considering California hasn't started yet.
karlboss said:Happy to go with last year. Personally I think you'd find near the top Cali beats TDU though it is slanted towards GC riders as opposed to sprinters, but for great riders top to bottom TDU takes it PT helps that along.
issoisso said:Average CQRanking points of the California top 20: 402,15
Average CQRanking points of the TDU top 20: 528,1
And as you said, since TDU is ProTour, if we go top to bottom the difference will be a lot bigger.
Libertine Seguros said:The comparison with Poland is also erroneous - there were larger names racing in the Tour de Pologne, such as Ivan Basso, but the race wasn't exactly tailored to them. You had some half-decent sprinters there (Greipel, Brown, Weylandt, Roelandts, Haedo, Napolitano, Bozic, Davis, Furlan, Guarnieri, Förster, Seba Chavanel and Boasson Hagen isn't a bad lineup) but they won't feature in a GC map, so balancing the races against each other using the GC isn't representative.
You also need to look at where a race is in the calendar before comparing. What was the Tour of California up against last year? Very little really. It still has a better lineup of GC riders this year, sure, but then it's sacrificing being the main race at the time. In early August last year, Poland obviously wouldn't get TDF contenders because the Tour had just finished. It was up against the Vuelta a Burgos and the Volta a Portugal, both of which took some Vuelta preppers away from it. But neither are bigger races than Poland, and Poland was the only one with international coverage. California has the coverage, but it's in the inferior position this year because it's up against the Giro.
And to whoever it was who said about California aiming to be the top warmup race for the Tour that isn't the Giro, I say 'Dauphiné, Tour de Suisse...'
karlboss said:move up to top 10 then
issoisso said:So your idea is to keep shifting the goalposts until you find something, anything that slightly supports your claim, eh?
Top 10, the difference is even more massive. 442,5 vs 621,2
karlboss said:What if you want something earlier?
karlboss said:Funny 2009 2010 TDU 2009 ToC I get 435.9 621.2 641.4 respectively...so how do you get your numbers?
I'm doing top 10 and their CQ points at the end of the year.
one of our maths is wrong, I'm tipping yoursissoisso said:Latest edition of each and points at the end of the last full season.
karlboss said:one of our maths is wrong, I'm tipping yours![]()
armstrong4ever said:Amgen Tour of California is the future. The reason why only 16 teams are participating in 2010 is simply because 2009 was a bad year for AEG economically.
Next year they hope to add 2 extra stages and gain ProTour status. You already see big stars choosing Amgen Tour of California over Giro d'Italia (Cavendish, Cancellara, Armstrong etc). With the growth of American sponsors, this race will only get bigger and better.
It's very sad for Giro d'Italia because it's by far the most interesting race and has alot of history.
issoisso said:I'd tell you why you're wrong, but the factors why those riders "chose" California (hint: they didn't) have already been posted a trillion times in this topic.
armstrong4ever said:You already see big stars choosing Amgen Tour of California over Giro d'Italia (Cavendish, Cancellara, Armstrong etc).
issoisso said:That's funny, tell me another one![]()
armstrong4ever said:You don't have to tell me anything.
python said:it will shrink back to the local competition status as the current generation of american pros who are in their late 30th retires. only a small number of european riders will ever be interested in a race oceans away from the center of their competition and base. california is a nice state with very active sporting tradition. but cycle racing is and always will be based in europe and the major sponsors will not allow it to change.
armstrong4ever said:Most of the major sponsors have interests in California.
python said:most of the major sponsors have many interest. california bike racing is a small thing for most of them. but i don't have a problem if you dream big. just don't get old waiting to long.
karlboss said:one of our maths is wrong, I'm tipping yours![]()
armstrong4ever said:Well, according to riders of Team RadioShack and HTC - Columbia it's the 2nd biggest race in the world for them.
Maybe I'm too optimistic but the potential is there.
armstrong4ever said:Well, according to riders of Team RadioShack and HTC - Columbia it's the 2nd biggest race in the world for them.
Maybe I'm too optimistic but the potential is there.
