The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
lol, that 500m burst was completely irrelevant for todays performance. He's just not (yet) good at these multiple mountain stages with 4000+ elevation. Happened last year in the Tour as well.Yesterday he decided he will chase Pog when he attacked. today he has not recovered from that effort and is dropped like a stone. on hindsight, he should be following at his own pace.
He's discovering grand tour riding. Plenty of riders can handle a week or a week and a half then it gets much tougher with the fatigue.Yesterday he decided he will chase Pog when he attacked. today he has not recovered from that effort and is dropped like a stone. on hindsight, he should be following at his own pace.
yeah having 3rd and 17th is better than 4th and 9th. Also team game could also mean going up the road to stage hunt / break glass in case of emergency on stage 20.That's pretty much the Ineos ethos to GC, they're not like jumbo or UAE who play multiple top 10 riders at the same time. Once you're not able to podium you're there to play the team game not be a fighting for minor placing outside.
It was a contentious and aggressive move (just read the arguments back and forth), and I think fairly indicative of general d0uchbaggery. But it was not malicious ... it's not like he punched another rider or attacked him with a pump! So, nope.Questions are: should Pidcock have been stripped of his third place, few days ago? And, after the scandal, should he have been prevented from starting in today‘s race?
I am not certain, and ask you guys.
Ummm, van der Poel and Sagan disagree with you. Pidcock had this as a huge target all year and he has been MTB racing for a long time. No doubt racing the Tour helped, but it is much more than that.An MTB pro by the way has no chance against a road pro coming from finishing TdF. They mostly opt for MTB because they are not good enough to be successful on the road. Then, no chance against Pidcock, who has an engine hardly ever seen.
Not sure where you're getting this from, but it seems clear the change was not really aimed at Pidcock (as he had earned a reasonable starting slot by taking time out of his TDF prep to race and win a MTB race, then Sagan and MVDP had it handed to them too) and he criticised the last minute rule change when asked about it. Where did you hear that British cycling had complained?Naturally then British cycling complained to UCI and the rules were changed to allow Pidcock, a British cyclist racing on British soil, a lesser disadvantage. The Top 10 of the MTB world are naturally furious since they worked the year round to get to the first row and then these guys come in and take the win. If Schurter were to not participate in the rankings and were to line up, he would lineup at the back.
It was a change made for Van der Poel and him only.Statement by Pidcock on the last-minute rule change:
View: https://twitter.com/tompidcock/status/1690626447830900736
I must completely miss which part of what he said is supposed to be douchyYou can benefit from something and still not agree with it, he apparently discussed this with Schurter too.
That said, someone from the Ineos PR team should teach him how to express himself without sounding like a total douche all the time.
That said, someone from the Ineos PR team should teach him how to express himself without sounding like a total douche all the time.