Very strange and didn’t realise that’s how they worked it out. I just presumed that as he ended the day on the same points, they were wiped off.yep, I thought the relegation also meant the points from the intermediate sprint.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Very strange and didn’t realise that’s how they worked it out. I just presumed that as he ended the day on the same points, they were wiped off.yep, I thought the relegation also meant the points from the intermediate sprint.
Yeah, except that Van Aert and Ewan also have no train and don't need to resort to shoulder barges. During the sprint, I've only seen Sagan and Bennett doing it this Tour. And Bennett's infringement was pretty minor. Clean sprinting should be applauded. And it doesn't impede excitement - Ewan's first win was fantastic sprinting, without ever doing something wrong.A LOT.
Try re-watching the bunch sprints this Tour, and look at the fight for position, the last kilometre - they are all bumping each other constantly, incl. Bennett.
The reason we see guys like Sagan do it closer to the finish line, is because they have no train to deliver them in perfect position, so they have to fight their way through.
But the actual pushing and showing they all do, the sprinters with a proper train just do it slightly further from the line.
Never said he should be DQd, it's too much obviously. I said that something should be done and the relegation is the correct penalty.I think people are making this a way bigger issue than it is.
Van Aert was moved about 30 centimeters by a slight bump, it happens all day, every day in cycling.
I agree with him being declassed, because he did impede Van Aert's sprint, but people talking about Sagan being DQd over such a small action are crazy IMO
I agree. Although one might argue that it is more dangerous to bump into other riders in a sprint than 3 km's from the finish. In the end I find that the relegation is OK, but I have seen examples of this happening before with no punishment. And for this reason let's at least just hope that the jury will be consistent from now on.A LOT.
Try re-watching the bunch sprints this Tour, and look at the fight for position, the last kilometre - they are all bumping each other constantly, incl. Bennett.
The reason we see guys like Sagan do it closer to the finish line, is because they have no train to deliver them in perfect position, so they have to fight their way through.
But the actual pushing and showing they all do, the sprinters with a proper train just do it slightly further from the line.
Ewan is really a smart sprinter....
Is a sprint at 70kph, a small bump can be dramatic, nothing happened here regarding accidents, but something needs to be corrected in order to avoid future crashs in the finish line because of those actions...
it doesn’t happen at absolute top speed at the peak of a sprint right up against the barriers without the guy responsible getting punished. If Van Aert had leaned back harder, Sagan could easily have ended up in the barriers.
That is oh so easy to say. This is the moment that Sagan decides to start sprinting for the gap:Seriously? There's a line there. From the start of his sprint until he gets the stomp, WVA maybe moves 20 cm left and 20 cm right. You can't sprint much more in a straight line than that. Sagan speculated on a gap opening up. The gap was too tight - OK, then that's bad luck and you try another day.
You have a vid of Wout doing a shoulder barge followed by a head butt? Show me please!
I never loathed or loved him. I admired his skill and results but sometimes his behavior has been a bit boorish and childish but he seems to have grown out of that. I didn't see much wrong with the sprint but I don't have a real problem with the decision either. Ten years ago no one would have blinked. The sport has changed and I guess what happened in Poland is still on a lot of people's minds. Compared to now the sprints from 20 years ago were filthy but the riders seemed to accept it most of the time. Time's change for good and bad. If they are going to clean up the sprints maybe they should also work on the routes as well............I don’t think he is generally hated. I mean he’s one of the most successful riders and one of the more flamboyant personalities, so of course he has both fans and detractors but he’s more loved than loathed on average. I have a problem with the way he’s been sprinting in this race, which has been consistently too physical.
Sagan boxed himself, just stop sprinting and fight another day, that's it...That is oh so easy to say. This is the moment that Sagan decides to start sprinting for the gap:
Seems to be a gap. A tiny gap, but a bigger gap than Ackermann had to be sure. This is the moment Wout drifts slightly left (not that it was intentional, but there he is):
At this point what do you do? His momentum is carrying him into van Aert. He can slam the brakes and risk being crashed into, and will likely bump into Wout anyways without any chance to position himself as he is reaching for the brakes. He can crash into the barrier. Or he can bump into Van Aert. He has milliseconds to decide.
Again, the risky move is taking the line at all. The rest is just punishing riders for the consequences, not their decisions.
This picture tells it all.That is oh so easy to say. This is the moment that Sagan decides to start sprinting for the gap:
Seems to be a gap. A tiny gap, but a bigger gap than Ackermann had to be sure. This is the moment Wout drifts slightly left (not that it was intentional, but there he is):
At this point what do you do? His momentum is carrying him into van Aert. He can slam the brakes and risk being crashed into, and will likely bump into Wout anyways without any chance to position himself as he is reaching for the brakes. He can crash into the barrier. Or he can bump into Van Aert. He has milliseconds to decide.
Again, the risky move is taking the line at all. The rest is just punishing riders for the consequences, not their decisions.
he body-checked the yellow rider, some seconds after the video starts. At the bottom of the screen.No idea what you are referring to?
Sagae appears to come in 3rd alone, ahead of the peloton?
Yeah, except that Van Aert and Ewan also have no train and don't need to resort to shoulder barges. During the sprint, I've only seen Sagan and Bennett doing it this Tour. And Bennett's infringement was pretty minor. Clean sprinting should be applauded. And it doesn't impede excitement - Ewan's first win was fantastic sprinting, without ever doing something wrong.
So are you one of the "crazy ones", that think he should be thrown out of the race?
he body-checked the yellow rider, some seconds after the video starts. At the bottom of the screen.
check another point of view here:
'Crapuleuze' Sagan reageert zelf op hetze na por in volle koers: "Sorry, maar deze dingen gebeuren"
"Ik vrees dat ik een aanval moet lanceren op de wereldkampioen." Met die woorden startte Karl Vannieuwkerke een heuse rel in de wielerwereld. Vannieuwkerke toonde woensdag in Extra Time Koers vervolgens een fragment uit Gent-Wevelgem, waarop te zien is hoe Peter Sagan net voor de Kemmelberg een...www.nieuwsblad.be