seems not a good idea to get bottles just before the last bump in the road where action was expected, to have something to drink for the next 10 minutes.
They probably assumed nobody would go until the descent
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
seems not a good idea to get bottles just before the last bump in the road where action was expected, to have something to drink for the next 10 minutes.
Seems ridiculous to have anyone back collecting bottles when it was obvious there would be constant attacks off the front of that group in the last 20k. I know hydration is important, but if Bauer was going to be the one to chase down attacks, he needed to stay close to the front of the group. If the DS told him to get bottles that poor decisionmaking.There was no easy stage win there because as soon as Kragh is chased down, if he even can be, a dozen of the other classics guys would be lining up to go. Not one rider in that group was going to ride to the line with Bennett Because they are not insane.
Lotto Soudal should have pulled Ewan out of the TDF after the second week - He's not climbing well,already got two stage victories and he is riding the Giro - By continuing on in the TDF it must jeopardise his chances in the Giro.
What are you gonna say when he wins Sunday?
Pulling out of the Tour jeopardizes his chances of winning on the Champs Elysees, though.Lotto Soudal should have pulled Ewan out of the TDF after the second week - He's not climbing well,already got two stage victories and he is riding the Giro - By continuing on in the TDF it must jeopardise his chances in the Giro.
yeah, I mean he has a strong chance of a win on the Champs, which is worth more than three r four Giro stages In terms of sponsor publicity.
There is prestige in winning Giro stages, especially in a more stacked field - He'll need to recover well to be competitive in the Giro.
Pulling out of the Tour jeopardizes his chances of winning on the Champs Elysees, though.
Yeah thought so.Their last green jersey was Boonen in 2007.
From a marketing perspective I can't imagine it's even close - they'll plaster the picture everywhere for the next couple of years!there absolutely is prestige in winning Giro stages. There isn’t as much prestige or publicity as there is in winning a Tour stage in Paris.
I just had a look at the Giro profiles. Unless there's a mistake in the y-axis, there are 3 stages in the whole race where Ewan can even hope to be close at the finish. Maybe 4, if he can get over the 2 cat4s near the finish of stage 13. And none of them before stage 7. WHY is he going?There is prestige in winning Giro stages, especially in a more stacked field - He'll need to recover well to be competitive in the Giro.
It certainly wasn't going to be easy. Bennett maybe hasn't got the experience in that situation to read the race but probably the only rider who had any chance at all to follow the move of SKA was himself. He'd actually been in perfect position on Sagan's wheel as Sagan had taken a long time to get across to Trentin's attack (that alone should have told him that Sagan was dead and most likely everyone else was in trouble too). That is often the case in a small group - the fastest sprinter has to chase down at least one attack - it won't be the winning move but it will discourage further attacksI really dont know how people are proposing that DQS could have got a stage win from that break. What do they think happens if Devenyns somehow brings back Kragh, something he probably can’t do anyway? It would just be ten classics guys going one after the other and everyone else sitting on Bennett waiting their turn
It certainly wasn't going to be easy. Bennett maybe hasn't got the experience in that situation to read the race but probably the only rider who had any chance at all to follow the move of SKA was himself. He'd actually been in perfect position on Sagan's wheel as Sagan had taken a long time to get across to Trentin's attack (that alone should have told him that Sagan was dead and most likely everyone else was in trouble too). That is often the case in a small group - the fastest sprinter has to chase down at least one attack - it won't be the winning move but it will discourage further attacks
Well, just watched today's winner escape once again. This was certainly no coincidence.
Søren Kragh Andersen sticked the knife in just when all in the group was á bloc after pulling on the hill. This is Kragh Andersen speciality. Watched this first time in Denmark in a prestigious post Tour criterium Hadsten Grand Prix in 2015 (tour winner Froome participated, 3k circuit with small 450m@7% climb to pass each round for an hour plus three rounds). Kragh counter-attacked on third round atop of the hill and kept distance to a chasing field with 25-40 sec distance for the rest of the race. Most impressive performance for a young semi-pro I've seen.
So call the chasers 'dumb' but that's what happens when you have a strong escaper in front. The risk/chance for the chasers to f*ck it up is almost 1:1.
And don't forget he actually won the TT stage in this years Paris-Nice.
Too easy to call the chasers 'dumb'.
This is a Søren Kragh Andersen top competence and habit.
So it's still dumb. They know he is a big threat and they didn't acknowledge / keep him in check.Too easy to call the chasers 'dumb'.
This is a Søren Kragh Andersen top competence and habit.
You have to know what is a race-winning move and what likely isn't. If someone comes over the top when everyone is at or over their limit as SKA did then clearly that is a race-winning move. If Bennett was able to get over to him I doubt there is another race-winning move coming for a while (nobody would have the legs at that point) and then Devenyns comes to the front and it settles down for a few minutes until it starts over againBut in that group attacks couldn’t be discouraged! You’d have to be lobotomised to ride to the line with Bennett. Every single classics type in the group knew they had to get away from him to win and if any of them were particularly hard of thinking they’d have had a DS shouting it in their ear. A move by Bennett to cover Kragh doesn’t discourage attacks, it just prompts the next one to instantly go over the top of him. His only real chance was that Sagan would be so desperate for a win that he’d cover moves and that was a very slander chance.
Yeah thought so.
I stand by it. Maybe DQS have a stage or two less than average, but also havethe green jersey, which is surely of similar value to a stage win.
I just had a look at the Giro profiles. Unless there's a mistake in the y-axis, there are 3 stages in the whole race where Ewan can even hope to be close at the finish. Maybe 4, if he can get over the 2 cat4s near the finish of stage 13. And none of them before stage 7. WHY is he going?
DeGendt should've skipped the Tour and gone to the Giro. He could win the whole thing just on solo breakaway days.
they also got lots of homework to do during the pandemic break, as Kragh mentioned yesterday. Maybe finding the perfect points to attack in the Tour was part of itNicolas Roche said it the other day in an interview about Sunweb when he said that there is no hierarchy ..they ride for whoever is strongest on the day and so there is np grand leader which means unlike GVA and Trentin they ride for each other
Same thoughts here. Ewan doesn't need to finish the Giro. Just some stage wins. At the other hand, what else can he ride this year after the Giro? There isn't much for him, he could as well stay ther until the end.Ideally, Ewan would ride the Vuelta but I don't ride the team - By my reckoning there are seven stages which Ewan could go for at the Giro, though I don't expect him to finish the race.