Tour de France Tour de France 2021, Stage 3: Lorient - Pontivy, 183.9 km

Page 22 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
he was pushed by Colbrelli and went down
I've seen a clip that shows Colbrelli gesticulating at Roglic after the fact. I've seen nothing to show that Colbrelli, or anyone other than Roglic, caused the crash. Certainly nothing to show that on a straight road, with the peloton riding 8 abreast, that course design had any causal impact, which was my point.
 
I will bet everything I have that Roglic touched Colbrelli's rear wheel, and Colbrelli probably was a bit upset because he probably almost lost his balance as well.

Those who claim it was a bodycheck (Zinoviev!), please come up with evidence, because for now, you are accusing Colbrelli of something very serious.
what the hell, Roglic was infront of Colbrelli
 
  • Haha
Reactions: F_Cance
Should they ride in something like this?

image-169FullWidthOdcPortrait-3ad9c279-1429219.jpg

This would work I think
bicycle-6.jpg
 
I will bet everything I have that Roglic touched Colbrelli's rear wheel, and Colbrelli probably was a bit upset because he probably almost lost his balance as well.

Those who claim it was a bodycheck (Zinoviev!), please come up with evidence, because for now, you are accusing Colbrelli of something very serious.

That's what was claimed NBC Sports, someone came over on him and pushed him off the course :(.
Also JV DS says he was Pushed off the road. No name mentioned.
 
Last edited:
If falls on these roads are inevitable, how come nobody predicted them? Did anyone on this forum, or amontg those closely related to the race, complain in advance that this was a dangerous route?
I read of riders aware that being in a good position from about 14km out as being important, but that is about tactics, not safety, and the race to a pinch point is key to the sport.
 
If falls on these roads are inevitable, how come nobody predicted them? Did anyone on this forum, or amontg those closely related to the race, complain in advance that this was a dangerous route?
I read of riders aware that being in a good position from about 14km out as being important, but that is about tactics, not safety, and the race to a pinch point is key to the sport.
riders wanted neutralization at 8km...my humble opinion it wouldnt have helped anyway
 
Quite right, cycling needs to learn how to stop bicycles turning into a fireball of death after every crash.


I think everyone agrees that there should be certain guidelines on the course design etc, but comparison with closed-circuit course like F1, where even on street-circuits they close down half the principality of Monaco for a week, aren't really a like-for-like with what the organisers of the Tour de France, who close down a public country road for a couple of hours at best, can do with their races.

My comparison with F1 is more than F1 listened to their drivers and made the sport very safe with all the improvements so much so that Grosjean can crash like that and still survive. Outside of mandatory helmets, UCI have done nothing. Theres a limit to what they can do of course but what they have done is nowhere close to enough. UCI need to be proactive and actually try to improve things here.
 
If falls on these roads are inevitable, how come nobody predicted them? Did anyone on this forum, or amontg those closely related to the race, complain in advance that this was a dangerous route?
I read of riders aware that being in a good position from about 14km out as being important, but that is about tactics, not safety, and the race to a pinch point is key to the sport.

Yes, the riders complained pre-stage, and asked for GC neutralisation at 8K.

Clearly the ASO should have followed the request.
 
My comparison with F1 is more than F1 listened to their drivers and made the sport very safe with all the improvements so much so that Grosjean can crash like that and still survive. Outside of mandatory helmets, UCI have done nothing. Theres a limit to what they can do of course but what they have done is nowhere close to enough. UCI need to be proactive and actually try to improve things here.
If the UCI listened to the riders, they wouldn't have made helmets mandatory. In the 90s the riders literally stopped stages and got off their bikes to protest against new helmet rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Broccolidwarf