The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I am thinking that TD might have known more in hindsight. He might have just ralized that he can't compete with the new state of the peloton, let alone Pogacar.Take it away, Tom
![]()
well yeah he said he did the same values as Bergen WC and Pogacar blew him away. So he realized at that moment he was never ever going to beat Pogacar because he knew he cannot improve to that level.I am thinking that TD might have known more in hindsight. He might have just ralized that he can't compete with the new state of the peloton, let alone Pogacar.
They were far slower on Romme in 2018, and the stage ridden far easier (and in easier conditions). And a bit weird that you call 4 % marginally, but just say slower than Dan Martin when the difference was 2 seconds (2/53 of the 'marginal' difference).I do think those times make it look like it's just that the others were very weak rather than Pogacar being completely out of the world, and he was just excellent. Climbed Colombiere slower than Dan Martin in 2018 based on that and only marginally faster than Contador and Schlecks back in 09.
They were far slower on Romme in 2018, and the stage ridden far easier (and in easier conditions). And a bit weird that you call 4 % marginally, but just say slower than Dan Martin when the difference was 2 seconds (2/53 of the 'marginal' difference).
Then you more or less never see anyone win by more than a marginal difference. It's equivalent to roughly 1'30'' on Alpe d'Huez, a massive difference.
You wrote about Colombière (even if you meant Romme for the Contador comparison) where the difference was 53'' which is far from marginal. And when you compare the total time of the two ascents (that is the relevant measure), this one is clearly far better than the two previous times the double has been climbed. And that's before taking the conditions into account, which make this year more impressive.Sure, but in this case, it's 19 seconds, which I'd say is marginal (as is Martin's difference).
Main point I'm making anyway is whilst it was a great performance, comparing his times to other years, it doesn't look like it was an out of the world performance (which you know what that implies in cycling). Others were either weak or more likely since they all finished together, gave up and just looked at each other.
Fun fact: Cavendish today finished ahead of past GT winniners Froome, Roglic and Thomas. On a tough mountain stage.
You wrote about Colombière (even if you meant Romme for the Contador comparison) where the difference was 53'' which is far from marginal. And when you compare the total time of the two ascents (that is the relevant measure), this one is clearly far better than the two previous times the double has been climbed. And that's before taking the conditions into account, which make this year more impressive.
From the timings posted by Red Rick earlier it looked like he was over a minute faster than them (in total) over the last two climbs
Ya, meant Romme in 09 and Colombiere in 18. Obviously combined, it's better than both but a minute better than 09 combined doesn't strike me as very crazy tbh, especially considering how much earlier in the race it is.
I didn't see any sitting up among the other GC contenders tbh, the battle for top5/podium is the real challenge this year with Pog way out ahead and there doesn't seem to have been any letup in it. Carapaz may have ended with some of the others again but had Castroviejo up the road to help him and gave it everything. Been a crazy couple of stages after the epic yesterday and there were some shattered riders out there, yet Pog could still take off on his own, crush everyone, and put in times which are great in any conditions. Looked seriously impressive in my opinion.
Ascents alone:
Romme (Source):
Pogačar: 26'29''
Carapaz: 27'36'' (+1'07'' = +4.22 %)
(Contador's group in 2009): 26'48'' (+0'19'' = +1.20 %)
Colombière (Source):
Pogačar: 21'55''
Carapaz: ???
(Contador's group in 2009): 22'48'' (+0'53'' = + 4.03 %)
Both ascents:
Pogačar: 48'24''
Carapaz:
(Contador's group in 2009): 49'36'' (+1'12'' = +2.48 %)
Will be updated when ammattipyoraily has Carapaz's time on Colombière.
What was the weather and overall stage for Hautacam that year? Judging by Armstrongs time it was ***?If the descent was done equally fast by the two (and note that Carapaz was paced by Castro while Pogi was alone), the difference on the two ascents would be 3'21'' = 6.92 %. More than the 6.56 % of Armstrong to Moreau on Hautacam. Brutal.
Hautacam, 2000:
Armstrong: 36’20’’
Moreau: 38’43’’ (+2’23’’ = +6.56 %)
Romme-Colombière (ascents exclusively), 2021:
Pogačar: 48'24''
Carapaz: 51'45'' (+3'21'' = +6.92 %)
Chase group: 52'12'' (+3'48'' = +7.85 %)
What was the weather and overall stage for Hautacam that year? Judging by Armstrongs time it was ***?
What was the weather and overall stage for Hautacam that year? Judging by Armstrongs time it was ***?
What was the weather and overall stage for Hautacam that year? Judging by Armstrongs time it was ***?