I don't understand this complaint about repeated climbs. It's the Tour de France. That's what you get. It's like people complaining that that they have to watch guys pedal their bikes.
At least with other climbs they can use them in different ways, the only difference in this one is adding the gravel bit on the end which actually makes it
worse.
What was Jumbo doing by not using Kuss to make the stage harder for Jonas?
I see you haven't seen Jumbo at any point in the last 2 years, allow me to fill you in...
With the original finish-line, it's a good climb that is worth being excited for. It has been overused, but it has still delivered every single time. 2012, 2014, 2017 & 2020 were all quite good for such a climb.
The gimmick gravel section significantly worsens it. Now it's all about timing the effort of the last 500 m of the climb. Sad for a good 1st category climb to be reduced to that.
This. Only without the "it's a good climb that is worth being excited for" bit. It's an OK climb without the gravel bit, but in 10 years it's caught up with the amount of uses Hautacam (introduced 1994) has had and is only just behind Angliru (introduced 1999) and Zoncolan (introduced 2003) - and been used repeatedly in other races too.
As a middle of week 1 kind of climb, it's fine, like when Aru won. It's like a tamer Peña Cabarga. But not every year. And certainly not every year including a gimmick section that turns it into a glorified sprint.
So what? That doesn't make it forum doctrine.
I guess in toby's mind, if I didn't say PDBF was overused, nobody else would have noticed?