He’s trying to gain points on lower climbs, not surprising seeing how this race is tilted to a GC rider winning the KOM comp.Perhaps, but he's doing it on the least important categorized climbs.
He’s trying to gain points on lower climbs, not surprising seeing how this race is tilted to a GC rider winning the KOM comp.Perhaps, but he's doing it on the least important categorized climbs.
What else have EF got to offer competitively in this Tour after Carapaz was out?I've never seen someone try as hard to finish 4th in the KOM classification in Paris as Powless.
Weird, both Küng and Wout were ahead of Cavagna 6-7k before 2nd timecheck but then behind. Wind changed?
At least his bike isn’t polka dots
With all their stage hunters in terrible form, not much. Which is a damning indictment of this lineup.What else have EF got to offer competitively in this Tour after Carapaz was out?
Its the time required to change the bike vs the lighter bike in term of power to weight ratio. For Cavagna time of 34.7 mins and assuming the same bike throughout, i get 417 watts with 6.8 kg bike and then taking 9 kg bike gives a gap of +25 s. The actual gap will be much less since it is only part of the way and the bike change has to be within that. So i think considering complications not worth it and not many will do it.I'm really curious about the bike calculations. Riders who stay on their TT bikes will benefit from decreased wind resistance even on the hill, but riders who change to their road bike will benefit from a lighter weight bike. Which saves more time?
https://www.procyclingstats.com/rac...1&avgsc=1&sortby=t23time&filter2=Apply+filterwhere can u see the climbing times for the cat 2? i dont see it on tissot page or racecenter page
where can u see the climbing times for the cat 2? i dont see it on tissot page or racecenter page
Powless and Uran should have aimed for final GC classifications and the UCI points.What else have EF got to offer competitively in this Tour after Carapaz was out?