What a monster.2023 | 20'58min | J.Vingegaard - RECORD
2020 | 22'27min | T.Pogacar, P.Roglic
![]()
What a monster.2023 | 20'58min | J.Vingegaard - RECORD
2020 | 22'27min | T.Pogacar, P.Roglic
![]()
Roglic is undisputedly better in one-week races than GTs, especially relative to Vingegaard, so the fact that he stayed with a Vingegaard who wasn't even trying at the Dauphiné isn't exactly an argument in favour of him. Yes, he probably stays closer to Vingegaard today than Pogacar did, but that argument only works if you think that Pogacar was at his usual level today. Given that he was with Kuss and only about 20 seconds ahead of Rodriguez, Yates x2 and Gaudu atop Marie-Blanque, he definitely wasn't.True, and you might be right. I am possibly grasping at straws for something other than certainty that Vingegaard is the next Lance Armstrong. My other piece of evidence that I forgot is:
- Vingegaard produced similar numbers to his absolute peak to date at last years Dauphine and Roglic held on. Vingegaard could have dropped him I think we all agree, but I’m not sure he could have put a minute into him unless you’re prepared to believe that he could have put in what I think would have been a record performance.
- TJV thought Roglic was close enough to send him to the Tour as co-leader despite his nagging injuries.
- Roglic knows the numbers and still wanted to race the Tour after the Giro. Maybe he wanted to dom for Vingegaard but he consistently talks about still winning the Tour. If he is so far off that he’d lose a minute on Vingegaard in the first climb, he’s foolish to do so.
So is Roglic not an elite climber either?Pogacar cracked because he's not an elite level climber,
They went pretty fast in 2020 too, not exactly full beans but it's an absurd performance
I imagine they also wanted WVA to get over Marie Blanque and help on the run out to Laruns, but he couldn't do it. Great effort, nonetheless!A tactical masterclass from WvA. For those still wondering what his value is:
1. He forced the break of the day;
2. He had some decent GC guys / climbers in the group, so by pushing very hard, he single-handedly forced UAE, who had no one in the break, to decimate half of their team;
3. When his own bid for glory was gone, he forced the pace in the front group, helping his team to drop all UAE riders, so the moment pogacar was dropped, he didn’t have any team mates.
So again, while people’s memory is still fresh, WvA was the key rider that contributed significantly to Vingegaard’s successful attack and the amount of time that was ultimately gained.
That is a big difference for sure. Also, this Cyclingnews write up of the 2020 stage is fascinating as it shows real-time evidence that Pogacar completely played Primoz.2023 | 20'58min | J.Vingegaard - RECORD
2020 | 22'27min | T.Pogacar, P.Roglic
![]()
So is Roglic not an elite climber either?
So I have the answer to all my questions. Vingegaard performance is completely out of this world.2023 | 20'58min | J.Vingegaard - RECORD
2020 | 22'27min | T.Pogacar, P.Roglic
![]()
That’s what we all said last year when Pogi was beaten by Quintana, Gaudu, and Yates on Granon. I think he holds on too long and pops. Also, Kuss is supremely good when he is on his day like today.Roglic is undisputedly better in one-week races than GTs, especially relative to Vingegaard, so the fact that he stayed with a Vingegaard who wasn't even trying at the Dauphiné isn't exactly an argument in favour of him. Yes, he probably stays closer to Vingegaard today than Pogacar did, but that argument only works if you think that Pogacar was at his usual level today. Given that he was with Kuss and only about 20 seconds ahead of Rodriguez, Yates x2 and Gaudu atop Marie-Blanque, he definitely wasn't.
Anyone else kinda think Hindley could have got more time. Buchmann hardly spent anytime on the front, they should have paced the break more and harder. Was noticeable there was almost always a group ahead of the main break and had Buchmann or even Hindley earlier done more work then they could maybe have got another 30 seconds. But great ride by them none the less
The last 4km of the climb are around 10% which is severe enough to do big damage.I'm with you. I didn't think Marie Blanque was hard enough to create havoc in the GC.
And even if it did, the long run out to Laruns would bring everyone back together.
The only one missing Froome is the Broom Wagon driver!The race is missing Froome
...and Granon wasn't Pogacar's normal level either, but simply a rare bad day, otherwise he wouldn't have incinerated those three over and over after that.That’s what we all said last year when Pogi was beaten by Quintana, Gaudu, and Yates on Granon. I think he holds on too long and pops. Also, Kuss is supremely good when he is on his day like today.
And the Froometto.The only one missing Froome is the Broom Wagon driver!
I clocked Pogi 36 sec behind at the top, so he still went 1:50+ faster than the record, so while he may not be at his best it can't be too far off.2023 | 20'58min | J.Vingegaard - RECORD
2020 | 22'27min | T.Pogacar, P.Roglic
![]()
Today even Pidcock was faster than the 2020 time...Pogacar cracked because he's not an elite level climber,
They went pretty fast in 2020 too, not exactly full beans but it's an absurd performance
…because he held on too long and popped...and Granon wasn't Pogacar's normal level either, but simply a rare bad day, otherwise he wouldn't have incinerated those three over and over after that.
That math works out to :52. I don’t think they were basically flat out at 100% that year but I can’t really remember. Either way, 2023 Vingegaard would have crushed them in 2020 I’m sure.I clocked Pogi 36 sec behind at the top, so he still went 1:50+ faster than the record, so while he may not be at his best it can't be too far off.
For context the Yates' group was 1:01-1:02 behind Vinge at the top
This is a better assessment than mine. Intelligent read.A tactical masterclass from WvA. For those still wondering what his value is:
1. He forced the break of the day;
2. He had some decent GC guys / climbers in the group, so by pushing very hard, he single-handedly forced UAE, who had no one in the break, to decimate half of their team;
3. When his own bid for glory was gone, he forced the pace in the front group, helping his team to drop all UAE riders, so the moment pogacar was dropped, he didn’t have any team mates.
So again, while people’s memory is still fresh, WvA was the key rider that contributed significantly to Vingegaard’s successful attack and the amount of time that was ultimately gained.
One can only hope. Speaking of “nice”, Carlos is the man!With Bernal at 4 minutes and Pidders at 2:36, I wonder if Ineos has found a new GC contender to support.
Oh yeah, my bad…because he held on too long and popped
That math works out to :52. I don’t think they were basically flat out at 100% that year but I can’t really remember. Either way, 2023 Vingegaard would have crushed them in 2020 I’m sure.
It was UAE’s fault for chasing, Vingegaard would have taken a minute anyway, and from the shots I saw Wout bridged to the break after it already had 10+ guys in it and multiple JV. Maybe he rode more than others but I think this is a bit of an exaggeration.A tactical masterclass from WvA. For those still wondering what his value is:
1. He forced the break of the day;
2. He had some decent GC guys / climbers in the group, so by pushing very hard, he single-handedly forced UAE, who had no one in the break, to decimate half of their team;
3. When his own bid for glory was gone, he forced the pace in the front group, helping his team to drop all UAE riders, so the moment pogacar was dropped, he didn’t have any team mates.
So again, while people’s memory is still fresh, WvA was the key rider that contributed significantly to Vingegaard’s successful attack and the amount of time that was ultimately gained.