Tour de France Tour de France 2024, Stage 1: Florence (Firenze) - Rimini, 206.0k

Page 20 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
In a straight line, yes. But the best descender are because of bike handling skills. Nibali and now Pidcock. Can has had a problem the last several years staying on his bike.

Generally both sprinters and successful classics riders are quite good bike handlers - and also have the fearless streak - they have to, to be good at their job.

We just rarely get to see them descending because it happens out of picture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHAD0W93
Are you disputing the basic principle in physics that heavier things descend faster? :p
Where did you study physics? The speed v you get from going down height h is v = Sqrt(2gh). As you see, there is no mass in that equation. The only advantage that bigger riders have is that going downhill they don't have the disadvantage of lifting their weight upwards which is what hinders them in climbs. So they can use all their power to gain speed downhill.
 
That's this thing that's held as a self evident truth when there's no particular reason to believe it.

Bigger riders will actually be less likely to race many mountainious races, and should therefor be less experienced descenders, and the amount of situations you have to bomb a descent to make a time cut represent a huge minority of descents raced.
According to (i think it was) Boonen, this is not true at all. If not Boonen, it was another big name sprinter who retired the last decade. He said that sprinters are generally speaking the best descenders of the peloton. Fans simply don't know this, because sprinters never descend while on camera, since they are minutes behind due to the preceding climb. But while they don't ride in the mountains as much as climbers, they are far more comfortable at taking tight corners at high speeds and they have a lot more power to accelerate out of every corner, their weight also works in their favor on longer straight sections of downhill.
 
Cav's always struggled in the heat but it's tough to watch. I got the impression he's really worked for this too, doing altitude camps (as mentioned in the Lidl Trek article), Suisse, etc. Wasn't just a casual farewell tour. Time comes for everyone but OTL on stage 1 would be a sad way to go out.
Maybe a stomach bug, something he ate. This is really unfortunate.
 
According to (i think it was) Boonen, this is not true at all. If not Boonen, it was another big name sprinter who retired the last decade. He said that sprinters are generally speaking the best descenders of the peloton. Fans simply don't know this, because sprinters never descend while on camera, since they are minutes behind due to the preceding climb. But while they don't ride in the mountains as much as climbers, they are far more comfortable at taking tight corners at high speeds and they have a lot more power to accelerate out of every corner, their weight also works in their favor on longer straight sections of downhill.
And they are always fighting for position in a bunch sprint and this increase their ability to handle their bike. This is not even a discussion, sprinters are by far better descenders than climbers. Cippo always said this.
 
Where did you study physics? The speed v you get from going down height h is v = Sqrt(2gh). As you see, there is no mass in that equation. The only advantage that bigger riders have is that going downhill they don't have the disadvantage of lifting their weight upwards which is what hinders them in climbs. So they can use all their power to gain speed downhill.
In a vacuum. Terminal velocity is governed by kg/CdA:

sKMbjXG.png