You're mocking because some folks here have actually raced, at whatever level?Not according to all the experienced bunch sprinters on this forum 🙄
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
You're mocking because some folks here have actually raced, at whatever level?Not according to all the experienced bunch sprinters on this forum 🙄
Not exactly in those nice words . . .Exactly. What's the first thing and the most frequent thing you hear riding in a pack?
"Hold your line!!!"
You cannot judge someone's speed from looking behind for a brief moment.To me, both Van Gils and Capiot make mistakes.
Van Gils is doing a leadout but he's not really a leadout guy so perhaps understandable for him. His mistake is going for a closing gap, which might be worth the risk for a sprinter but isn't for him - De Lie probably gets blocked even if he himself squeezes through. Because Van Gils is low and Capiot has sat up his shoulder makes contact with Capiot's elbow which is why he falls dramatically to the left rather than getting knocked to the right.
Capiot looks left, must see Van Gils coming on that side yet then drifts that way. The only way I can explain that is if he's deliberately trying to block the path in which case it's hard to have much sympathy. Just keep your line!
Not mocking anyone for actually having raced a bike, but equating experiences that are most likely from industrial park cat 3 crits is worthlessYou're mocking because some folks here have actually raced, at whatever level?
Definitely not! And so often it's ridiculous, but one quickly gets the idea.Not exactly in those nice words . . .
Hey, hey. Easy on industrial park Cat 3s.Not mocking anyone for actually having raced a bike, but equating experiences that are most likely from industrial park cat 3 crits is worthless
Yeah, I'd go straight up Marca and then turn right to take the same last 1.5 km as in 2006.No longer possible since they remodelled Place Gramont. They could come from Rue Marca instead but that's the least convenient place to enter Place Verdun.
Which perfectly explains why it is wrong to assume you can drift that way without potentially causing an accidentYou cannot judge someone's speed from looking behind for a brief moment.
I'd be interested to hear why someone's Cat 3 (incidentally that's where I raced) experience isn't more relevant than someone's "I watch it on TV" experience.Not mocking anyone for actually having raced a bike, but equating experiences that are most likely from industrial park cat 3 crits is worthless
Sure, there’s responsibility for that rider as well.Which perfectly explains why it is wrong to assume you can drift that way without potentially causing an accident
If the riders behind you are really close, except they weren't. There was more than enough time for van Gils to slow down, and he had all the visual information he needed to do so, yet he decided to take the risk, and this is the result.Which perfectly explains why it is wrong to assume you can drift that way without potentially causing an accident
That's simply not true.Not mocking anyone for actually having raced a bike, but equating experiences that are most likely from industrial park cat 3 crits is worthless
I'm scarred head to toe from putting myself into the fray in hundreds of elite/pro races and most of those scars came from bad decisions, mine or others, like we watched today.I'd be interested to hear why someone's Cat 3 (incidentally that's where I raced) experience isn't more relevant than someone's "I watch it on TV" experience.
Putting yourself if the fray brings a WHOLE lotta experience and information about what goes on in a pack. Fundamentals are the same. Speed is very different.
And was the experience at that level fundamentally different? All I ever noticed was that it got safer the further up the rankings you went, because more people knew what they were doing. I would occasionally race Cat 2 with my team (never qualified, but was allowed) and it was so much cleaner than Cat 3. Guys knew what was up.I'm scarred head to toe from putting myself into the fray in hundreds of elite/pro races and most of those scars came from bad decisions, mine or others, like we watched today.
Don't think anyone's experience is less valid. Today they are rolling at pretty significant speed, leaning on someone with your head ,shoulder, or hip happens all the time, arm and handlebar contact is all day long including in the sprint.I'd be interested to hear why someone's Cat 3 (incidentally that's where I raced) experience isn't more relevant than someone's "I watch it on TV" experience.
Putting yourself if the fray brings a WHOLE lotta experience and information about what goes on in a pack. Fundamentals are the same. Speed is very different.
Well I think zero experience is less valid, and the more experienced a racer is, the more valid I would say the commentary is, generally.Don't think anyone's experience is less valid. Today they are rolling at pretty significant speed, leaning on someone with your head ,shoulder, or hip happens all the time, arm and handlebar contact is all day long including in the sprint.
The same amount of contact that caused the crash happened in every race this week.. When the planets align you are going down. When it's your time it's your time.
That's true in general but field sprinting in pros is a completely different game.And was the experience at that level fundamentally different? I ever noticed was that it got safer the further up the rankings you went, because more people knew what they were doing. I would occasionally race Cat 2 with my team (never qualified, but was allowed) and it was so much cleaner than Cat 3. Guys knew what was up.
What counts as zero experience? That of Manolo Saíz?Well I think zero experience is less valid, and the more experienced a racer is, the more valid I would say the commentary is, generally.
But agree on all the rest, 100%.
After Tourmalet there isn't a better climb than this side of hourquette ancizan?Tourmalet and Pla d'Adet tomorrow. The race for the GC is now on.
I appreciate having the comments/insights from folks who have significant racing experience.Well I think zero experience is less valid, and the more experienced a racer is, the more valid I would say the commentary is, generally.
But agree on all the rest, 100%.
So you were 100% in favor of the shoulder? 🤣🤣🤣I appreciate having the comments/insights from folks who have significant racing experience.
Of course, to discuss this crash I was drawing from my experience playing (American) football. 🤣
What I noticed moving through the ranks is that you get a bunch of knucklehead crashes at the lower levels up through about Cat 3. Above that most of the crashes are crashes of aggression, particularly in sprints, but you still get the knucklehead crashes, even in the WT. I know there are bigger fields and longer races in the WT and therefore more opportunity but they crash all the time and most of the time it's just a touch of wheels.And was the experience at that level fundamentally different? All I ever noticed was that it got safer the further up the rankings you went, because more people knew what they were doing. I would occasionally race Cat 2 with my team (never qualified, but was allowed) and it was so much cleaner than Cat 3. Guys knew what was up.