This is not a random quote. The interview is on "Rouler" and is not out of context. He was speaking about Vingegaard.
Your quote it out of the blue. The only source I could find was here:
'It's the best for us to have the highest level, and the best one will win' says Slovenian ahead of season debut in Paris-Nice
www.cyclingnews.com
The interview is from February 2024. My post is about Vuelta which took place in August-September 2023! And you dare to say that it's not out of context.
There's no indications that Roglic is at the level of Vingegaard, even Roglic fans in general already admitted that Roglic is not at the level of Pogacar and Vingegaard in Grand Tours, but of course it doesn't mean Roglic can't win the Tour, because bad luck sometimes happens, and it just takes one or two crashes to change the situation.
Being a fan of a rider has no bearing in acknowledging that the rider is above or under another rider.
Roglic winning a Tour with Vingegaard and Pogacar without any mishaps affecting these three riders is possible, although odds are not on Roglic's side. It depends on the parcours. People forget what Roglic's real level is because he's always riding with injuries or crashing out.
Visma knows very well who is the strongest of the two. For some reason they let Roglic go, and they stayed with Vingegaard. For some reason they choose Vingegaard instead of Roglic for the Tour 2023 because they knew/said they had the data who let them confident he could beat Pogacar, and of course, they knew they had more chances with Vingegaard instead of Roglic to win the Tour. Unless you think Heijboer doesn't understand nothing of data.
I have said multiple times that data is useful for teams and riders assessing their performances but one has to be bigger than data in order to know how to read it
[content deleted]
It sounds like teams prepare races and make decisions solely based on data: "we have run the model with the route of Tour 202X and it says there's a 99% chance of Vingo beating Pogacar. Data is a suggestion, the outcomes are not written in stone and data is there to be interpreted. Data only becomes real when they race. Otherwise races would be decided before they happen, which is what you seem to entail. And you cannot measure how the psyche affects performances or your dear "data output".
Finnally, there are other reasons for Roglic not going to the Tour: crashing out so often (2x) and loosing one Tour in stage 20, avoiding conflicts within the team, being older.
You just need to look at the perfomances in the previous Tours. Vingegaard absolutely annihilated Pogacar in the Time Trial.
Roglic lost the Tour in the Time trial to Pogacar.
I have say it before and I'll say it again: this is LAZY thinking. You cannot use rider X to compare rider Y to Z. Because you ignore contexts with all their magnitude. The routes in both TTs are different. PDBF TT happened in stage 20 in Tour 2020, Combloux TT in stage 16 in Tour 2023.
[content deleted]
Are you really serious talking about the Vuelta 2023?! Vingegaard had the the Tour de France in the legs, he was sick in the first week, and he stayed in Denmark between the Tour and Vuelta. He didn't made a good preparation like Roglic.
Roglic was in altitude training camps, did a perfect preparation, and yet he never could drop Vingegaard, not even on Jalavambre or Angliru.
Again, I was talking about Angliru and the Vuelta in general: Roglic and Vingo couldn't drop each other. Vuelta 2023 Roglic besides his "age" proved he was up there with the allegedly best GT rider in the world. I was not stating that Roglic proved he was better, I stated he showed how he was not worse.
[content deleted]