Remco & Jonas friendly ...So 3 ITT next year?
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Remco & Jonas friendly ...So 3 ITT next year?
Also, ITT on penultimate day (hoping for 50+ km. Unlikely but hey, I can dream).
lol well it’d be history making for sure. Just for the sake of having fun, how long do you guys think a flat time trial would need to be to sway the balance of power from Pog and Jonas to Remco?Prudhomme must be worried sick that 2025 will be a snooze fest like 2024, and he must resort to stages over 150km!
They said Peyragudes was a 13 km MTTI only count two time trials in the map posted by La Flamme Rouge. Caen and the 150 k time trial on stage 20, lol.
With that said, it does seem like this route could be friendly to Jonas, Pog and Remco. It might be so soft it tempts the top two into trying the double while making Remco think he has a shot against a tired pog and Jonas, especially if that last time trial happens and is long. It’s just that a 50 k time trial goes against everything the powers that run these things seem to believe in..
I realize that, but it wouldn’t shock me if the Tour was allowed to break the rule as an “experiment”Half-stages are explicitly banned in the WT.
That or we can also see the 28 km big climb. Just finishing at the top this time instead of going to the altiport. I’m not aware if there’s a difference with the final four km though.probably not the extended Courchervel version from 2023 but the big climb we saw in 2020
I know. It’s a freaking crime.Last 3 weekends, 5 sprint stages... oh Lord, WTH are they doing?
Also wondered about that. Especially with the stage 20 TT. It’s just rumors though. Also, I think they just forgot to put that the Peyragudes stage is a MTT.There’s just a ton on this map that goes against what velowire has been reporting and I am inclined to believe velowire is more accurate. In particular that stage 20 individual time trial doest’t pass the smell test. Plus what about the “ground breaking” time trial to Peyragudes? This map doesn’t have it.
They should make stage 21 a pursuit race to decide the GC, it would have been Valverde fans‘ wet dream when he used to race. (He would still G2 syndrome his group into oblivion instead of catching Froome or whomever).They could do a pursuit mountain TT. That would be fun. It would need to be early ish in the race though.
Could be they got a few of the start/finish locations mixed around.There’s just a ton on this map that goes against what velowire has been reporting and I am inclined to believe velowire is more accurate. In particular that stage 20 individual time trial doest’t pass the smell test. Plus what about the “ground breaking” time trial to Peyragudes? This map doesn’t have it.
Ah sorry, I'm an idiot! I thought it was strangely soft before the cycle path... That explains it.
That or we can also see the 28 km big climb. Just finishing at the top this time instead of going to the altiport. I’m not aware if there’s a difference with the final four km though.
I know. It’s a freaking crime.
Also wondered about that. Especially with the stage 20 TT. It’s just rumors though. Also, I think they just forgot to put that the Peyragudes stage is a MTT.
200 km of TT and only 3 mountain stages without opportunity for a long range attack.lol well it’d be history making for sure. Just for the sake of having fun, how long do you guys think a flat time trial would need to be to sway the balance of power from Pog and Jonas to Remco?
Do people know how reliable this source is? Since velowire hasn't changed anything about their prediction I checked the link in the tweet and they write their proposed route is based on a mixture of rumours from regional media and their own sources, which makes me doubt they are more reliable than velowire (who are basically doing the same thing but they have a history of being quite good at it). Not that it makes that much of a difference, their proposed routes are quite similar after all, but I'd really prefer one HC mtf less and Alp d'Huez instead of a wasted edition of Col de la Loze.View: https://x.com/laflammerouge16/status/1845723263684559290
New possible rumors. No Alpe d'Huez but Col de la Loze MTF. If that's the case, it's waiting game again until the final four steep kilometers. Pogi would surely want to exorcise the demons of 2023 and go for revenge on that stage.
Also, ITT on penultimate day (hoping for 50+ km. Unlikely but hey, I can dream).
Except for a route of 21 flat or ITT stages, any route is gonna be Pog v Jonas.Can't wait for 2026 already... garbage route, very backloaded, probably not a stage designed to provide long range attacks. This route is looking too good for Pogacar against Vingegaard. Only a week of real mountains (third week).
Well, though you will get better routes than what is rumoured next year, the Tour almost never provide really good routes with several stages designed for long range attacks. It will be about MTFs at Hautacam, Peyragudes, Plataeu de Beille, Alpe d'Huez, Granon, La Plagne and other. The best one could hope for is a better first week with more hilly and GC relevant stages, and mountain stages with somewhat better combos than what's rumoured next year.Can't wait for 2026 already... garbage route, very backloaded, probably not a stage designed to provide long range attacks. This route is looking too good for Pogacar against Vingegaard. Only a week of real mountains (third week).
Tour 2022-2024 had good routes. Too many sprint stages but still very good. Maybe a little backloaded this yearWell, though you will get better routes than what is rumoured next year, the Tour almost never provide really good routes with several stages designed for long range attacks. It will be about MTFs at Hautacam, Peyragudes, Plataeu de Beille, Alpe d'Huez, Granon, La Plagne and other. The best one could hope for is a better first week with more hilly and GC relevant stages, and mountain stages with somewhat better combos than what's rumoured next year.
The riders well down the rankings coming in several hours after the winner is not a good look.They should make stage 21 a pursuit race to decide the GC, it would have been Valverde fans‘ wet dream when he used to race. (He would still G2 syndrome his group into oblivion instead of catching Froome or whomever).
They could do like in 2017 and limit the number of riders participating in the pursuit.The riders well down the rankings coming in several hours after the winner is not a good look.
They can start in a wave at thirty minutes or something or, if you‘d just nuke the GC times (a bit silly), hold a separate sprint race.The riders well down the rankings coming in several hours after the winner is not a good look.
What 2017 event was that?They could do like in 2017 and limit the number of riders participating in the pursuit.