The Hitch said:
lol never looked at that, just heard that Boulder was the home of cycling in Us
Nah, Boulder's not the home of cycling here, they just think they are.

Boulder is popular among top level cyclists, but Northern California - Nevada has more strength in depth. A Cat 3 racer in the latter location might hold his own against a Cat 1 from somewhere else in the country.
Lots of talent and very competitive.
What's interesting about the Pacific Northwest, though, is that cycling is about a lot more than just racing there. In fact, even though the locale is the most cycling-oriented place in the country, I'd guess most of the people don't follow racing (we'll have to ask Alpe). For them, cycling is about lifestyle. Sort of like Amsterdam, I guess, in that regard at least.
But whether it's there, or Northern Cali, or Boulder, European cycle sport just gets very little notice. Despite years of U.S. participation in pro cycling, and despite the famous American riders, it's just not on the U.S. radar. I think it has everything to do with being a continent-spanning, insular country that has an ongoing love affair with the car.
If we can get some cycling infrastructure built in the cities and get more people out of cars and onto bikes and organize more community-based road races, things might change. But lots of Americans object to those ideas, even here on this forum, so you can imagine what a challenge it is.
But anyway, to take this back on topic, the only reason we're even able to watch European races here in the U.S. is that we have the Web. If it weren't for that, we'd be back to foreign magazines and DVDs. The rare exception is the Tour de France, which is always broadcast on cable.