People are clearly overreating over Movistar. Like it was said, 80% of you were expecting this stage to be won by a break and still insult Movistar for actually doing something that in my opinion, was the best that could be done. Movistar did whatever they could, literally destroying Sky, not able to shoot down Froome because he is too strong, and most of all, Valverde did'nt have the legs. You people were shown since the first day to be all 'wet' over Quintana, always praying for him to take a dump on Valverde and keep on. It is only the first week of his first Tour, so he never proved anything over 3 week racing, at least when riding for GC. How come he could have kept on the attack on last climb? You blame Valverde? In case Nairo had the legs and kept on going, Froome would eventually follow him with ease, and Valverde was shown not to have the legs. That my friends, would be tactical suicide. At the moment, apart from Froome, Movistar might have the two best riders in Top10, one in second, the other just a few seconds away from third.
Valverde never said his main objective for this Tour was the win, but the Top3, wich Movistar might well achieve with 2 riders. Why don't you blame Contador or Evans? Alberto even sent Kreuzo at some point, in last climb, to the front of the race, in order to try and prevent attacks. This Tour was won from the day it departed from Corsica, it was always a fight between the rest.