The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Belgium unsurprisingly crushing the best intermediate time.
France 2nd at over 20s.
Yes, i meant that it was no surprise that Belgium would have the best time of all the teams that already passed the intermediate.Best teams still have to come tho.
Absolutely no idea why the live isn't even showing Belgium once, they have one of the GC favorites ffs.
Uijtdebroeks lost half a minute yesterday though.So Uijtdebroecks and Van Eetvelt taking a minute on Martinez.
Norway and Netherlands 23 and 24 seconds behind Belgium at first intermediate
Possible, or Norway did a good pacing plan.Belgium 2nd part wasn't fast enough, didn't win any time on Norway for example. Think Germany takes this.
Can't watch the stream atm, how did the Italians?All teams passed by intermediate 1
Belgium 1 second faster than Germany. GB, Denmark, Netherlands... at around 15s and up.
Can't watch the stream atm, how did the Italians?
Good but not great. I think they will be just outside the top 5.Can't watch the stream atm, how did the Italians?
Thanks for the info. Honestly, only 2 guys on that team are actually good TTers (Milesi and Piganzoli), after them a sprinter like Bruttomesso is probably their best rider for the TTT. Could have gone better, could have gone worse, but all things considered it's not that bad. They would have been a lot better if they had Garofoli and Frigo on the team.Good but not great. I think they will be just outside the top 5.
EDIT: Currently 7th at +/- 55s from Germany. Less than 10s ahead of France.
That's what i figured. They're only half a minute off the podium.Thanks for the info. Honestly, only 2 guys on that team are actually good TTers (Milesi and Piganzoli), after them a sprinter like Bruttomesso is probably their best rider for the TTT. Could have gone better, could have gone worse, but all things considered it's not that bad. They would have been a lot better if they had Garofoli and Frigo on the team.
Actually the Italian team did not that bad with the 4 riders setting the team TTT result; but the 2 other riders finished OTL....Can't watch the stream atm, how did the Italians?
This is what you get when internal politics get in the way of selecting a team that is actually built to ride for the gc, you have to pick the riders from the right teams to make everyone happy...Actually the Italian team did not that bad with the 4 riders setting the team TTT result; but the 2 other riders finished OTL....
I think as a team not the result you looked for...
This is what you get when internal politics get in the way of selecting a team that is actually built to ride for the gc, you have to pick the riders from the right teams to make everyone happy...
Why do you bring 2 sprinters/1 sprinter and a leadout man if they are gonna finish OTL in the TTT anyway?
Some of the best climbers aren't available because of injuries/health problems or team related stuff, but bringing 2 good one day racer with a big engine (guys like Nicolo Buratti or Federico Guzzo) who have good results in Italian one day races with a good international field would be an obvious pick. De Pretto would be another name, but maybe he's not available because he's a trainee at BEX?
The LTS thing is probably the one thing that I get the most, having a few spots for riders from other (smaller u23) teams and not having them take up more than 50% of the team isn't that stupid.I wouldn't be surprised if those 2 riders thought everyone would be capped at 2 minutes and there wasn't a time cut...
I agree tho that these politics are annoying but they happen in a lot of countries, GB for example where they want to promote their academy or Belgium where they don't want to have more than 3 guys of LTS in a national selection.