• We hope all of you have a great holiday season and wonderful Christmas. Thanks so much for being part of the Cycling News community in 2025 and beyond!

tour de luxembourg 18-22 september 2024

Page 9 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mar 4, 2011
8,508
11,270
23,180
No: it is one of the three permitted "points of support": not all of them need to be maintained at all times. If someone chose to ride the entire race out of the saddle, the rules would not be broken. But torso on toptube is not a permitted point of support, and not is forearms/chest on handlebars.
So if he rode that descent in virtually the same position ( with butt contact) but used his arms and core to keep his chest a centimeter above the bars he’d be legal?
This is the trouble with creating rules that are so artificial and unjustified ( not based on data)—it puts officials in the ridiculous position of having to get out rulers to measure sock length.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmdirt
So if he rode that descent in virtually the same position ( with butt contact) but used his arms and core to keep his chest a centimeter above the bars he’d be legal?
This is the trouble with creating rules that are so artificial and unjustified (not based on data)—it puts officials in the ridiculous position of having to get out rulers to measure sock length.

Not my role to try to defend the UCI, but I cannot see how such a rule could be based on data. Specifying what are and are not permitted points of contact seems just about the only objective way to legislate on the matter.
 
Jul 9, 2009
7,938
1,366
20,680
So if he rode that descent in virtually the same position ( with butt contact) but used his arms and core to keep his chest a centimeter above the bars he’d be legal?
This is the trouble with creating rules that are so artificial and unjustified ( not based on data)—it puts officials in the ridiculous position of having to get out rulers to measure sock length.
Let's make cycling like figure skating and NBA foul calls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sciatic
Mar 4, 2011
8,508
11,270
23,180
Not my role to try to defend the UCI, but I cannot see how such a rule could be based on data. Specifying what are and are not permitted points of contact seems just about the only objective way to legislate on the matter.
The data would be statistics showing that descending position contributed to more, and more (% wise) injurious crashes on race descents than other descending positions used in the same circumstances. I think they just used the “eye test” to determine it’s more risky, without any other proofs.
Creating artificial rules, they can show they’re doing something about rider safety.
 
May 6, 2021
12,907
23,963
22,180
  • Like
Reactions: Berniece
Sep 4, 2017
3,594
4,240
19,180
Wonder who chased that move down as with the whole of the top 10 in it barring Ayuso, and his key teammate Hirschi was in there, it was not obvious who would be motivated or able to successfully chase it back.
 
May 6, 2021
12,907
23,963
22,180
Il cecchino di San Marino winning a stage race because Hirschi and Ayuso can't decide who the leader is and VDP being tired because he's been attacking from 150k out for no reason, it's all funny stuff.