I'd like to see that.But torso on toptube is not a permitted point of support,
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I'd like to see that.But torso on toptube is not a permitted point of support,
I can't imagine any non-torso part of the body being on the toptube. I can easily imagine parts of the torso that are not the backside being there (painful as it may be).I'd like to see that.
I was picturing part of the torso other than the pelvic area.I can't imagine any non-torso part of the body being on the toptube. I can easily imagine parts of the torso that are not the backside being there (painful as it may be).
So if he rode that descent in virtually the same position ( with butt contact) but used his arms and core to keep his chest a centimeter above the bars he’d be legal?No: it is one of the three permitted "points of support": not all of them need to be maintained at all times. If someone chose to ride the entire race out of the saddle, the rules would not be broken. But torso on toptube is not a permitted point of support, and not is forearms/chest on handlebars.
So if he rode that descent in virtually the same position ( with butt contact) but used his arms and core to keep his chest a centimeter above the bars he’d be legal?
This is the trouble with creating rules that are so artificial and unjustified (not based on data)—it puts officials in the ridiculous position of having to get out rulers to measure sock length.
Let's make cycling like figure skating and NBA foul calls.So if he rode that descent in virtually the same position ( with butt contact) but used his arms and core to keep his chest a centimeter above the bars he’d be legal?
This is the trouble with creating rules that are so artificial and unjustified ( not based on data)—it puts officials in the ridiculous position of having to get out rulers to measure sock length.
The data would be statistics showing that descending position contributed to more, and more (% wise) injurious crashes on race descents than other descending positions used in the same circumstances. I think they just used the “eye test” to determine it’s more risky, without any other proofs.Not my role to try to defend the UCI, but I cannot see how such a rule could be based on data. Specifying what are and are not permitted points of contact seems just about the only objective way to legislate on the matter.
When you're right....................No.
Then again Ayuso did finish with Hirschi and has the better TT, so there's also a case to be made that Hirschi should have been working for Ayuso rather than the other way round.
I don't see how VDP controls this tomorrow. Probably a non UAE rider wins the stage and GC.
1 | 1 | HIRSCHI Marc | 0:08 | ||
2 | 11 | VAN DER POEL Mathieu | +0 | ||
3 | 21 | TIBERI Antonio | 0:10 | ||
4 | 22 | STANNARD Robert | 13:57 | ||
5 | 43 | RYAN Archie | 4:39 | ||
6 | 46 | SWEENY Harry | 0:28 | ||
7 | 53 | GAUDU David | 0:39 | ||
8 | 62 | BERNARD Julien | 28:40 | ||
9 | 66 | SIMMONS Quinn | 1:52 | ||
10 | 71 | MILESI Lorenzo | 22:05 | ||
11 | 82 | VANSEVENANT Mauri | 0:03 | ||
12 | 95 | STAUNE-MITTET Johannes | 1:59 | ||
13 | 96 | GRAAT Tijmen | 2:13 | ||
14 | 102 | VANHOUCKE Harm | 9:41 | ||
15 | 145 | PIGANZOLI Davide | 0:46 | ||
16 | 165 | STORER Michael | 1:03 | ||
17 | 186 | WENZEL Mats | 0:57 |
Wonder who chased that move down as with the whole of the top 10 in it barring Ayuso, and his key teammate Hirschi was in there, it was not obvious who would be motivated or able to successfully chase it back.
Why exactly?