Tour de Romandie 2012

Page 46 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 31, 2011
231
0
0
hrotha said:
More naturally talented riders benefit less from doping, so no, it's not the same.

Doping gives such a benefit. Maybe naturally talented riders benefit less from doping. I didn't know that, but if you are certain of that, alright. But I think that when only a few dope, they will be ahead of the others further than what the best will be when everyone or no-one dopes. So those bigger differances allow them to jump away early on a climb and stay away. Which is less likely to happen when no-one or everyone drugs. I think most races lately prove that point. Everyone is too frightened to not attack too early because you're likely to lose time after they catch you back instead of gain something from your attack.
 
Jun 10, 2010
19,897
2,256
25,680
Ryo Hazuki said:
the 80s weren't better than the 90s. or the 70s better than the 80s. that;'s just your opinion, you are just a blind hater of dopign, we all know by now :rolleyes:
It's not an opinion. If you're defining "better" as "had more aggressive racing and early attacks", then it's a fact that the 80s were better than even the early 90s. Back then everybody was complaining about how dull everything was and how only few riders dared to attack much anymore.

And thanks for the compliment. I'm not blind though.
 
Jun 10, 2010
19,897
2,256
25,680
Azabael said:
Doping gives such a benefit. Maybe naturally talented riders benefit less from doping. I didn't know that, but if you are certain of that, alright. But I think that when only a few dope, they will be ahead of the others further than what the best will be when everyone or no-one dopes. So those bigger differances allow them to jump away early on a climb and stay away. Which is less likely to happen when no-one or everyone drugs. I think most races lately prove that point. Everyone is too frightened to not attack too early because you're likely to lose time after they catch you back instead of gain something from your attack.
That only would apply to the very early 90s, before everyone got on the gear. Certainly not to the early 00s.
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
hrotha said:
It's not an opinion. If you're defining "better" as "had more aggressive racing and early attacks", then it's a fact that the 80s were better than even the early 90s. Back then everybody was complaining about how dull everything was and how only few riders dared to attack much anymore.

And thanks for the compliment. I'm not blind though.

Did Ryo seriously just called you a "blind hater of doping"?

My god, this forum needs a facepalm emote.

The 70s were the golden age of cycling in my opinion, watched a lot of documentaries about that era and it was pretty legendary. Especially the infamous Tour de France of 1971. The Giro d'Italia of 1973 wasn't too shabby either with the epic duel between Eddy Merckx and José Manuel Fuente.
 
May 6, 2011
451
0
0
Why does doping benefit less talented riders more, rather than it being a random effect? Just thinking through the maths, this correlation would have to be quite strong to offset the differences in absolute terms (i.e. If a rider on 400w gains 10%, then a rider on 350w would need 11.5% to remain on level terms, and 25% to catch up fully).
 
Jul 3, 2009
18,948
5
22,485
A bit of common sense please, if a doping discussion is starting up >>> move to the clinic and don't keep pushing the discussion in a race thread.
 
Jun 10, 2010
19,897
2,256
25,680
Ferminal said:
A bit of common sense please, if a doping discussion is starting up >>> move to the clinic and don't keep pushing the discussion in a race thread.
Well you should remove the "bring back the epo" comments then, because it's simply wrong to allow them to stay unchallenged.
 
Jan 11, 2010
15,619
4,553
28,180
Meanwhile, there's a race going on over in Switzerland.

6 guys with a 3 minute advantage:

44 Johann Tschopp (BMC) +0:25
51 Guillaume Levarlet (SAU) +0:28
59 Petr Ignatenko (KAT) +0:37
68 Eduard Vorganov (KAT) +1:42
72 Jorge Azanza (EUS) +2:54
91 Jean-Christophe Peraud (ALM) +7:46
 
Jan 11, 2010
15,619
4,553
28,180
Levarlet is a reasonable climber as well. Don't know how much leeway they'll get though.

Tejay Van Garderen abandons after a crash on the descent.
 
Apr 2, 2010
5,266
441
18,580
''Massively strong headwind in Romandie - Sky chasing escape at 20kms per hour! Can barely stand up, let alone ride a bike...''

From twitter
 
Apr 2, 2010
5,266
441
18,580
''This wind is close to being dangerous with gusts over 60kms per hour..not sure what it means in the mountains...''

Another Queen stage cancelled? :eek:
 
Jan 11, 2010
15,619
4,553
28,180
The final of the stage is in a different valley, in Martigny they go east and maybe the wind conditions are different.
 
Apr 17, 2010
1,133
0
9,980
Geraint Too Fast said:
BMC twitter.


That sucks for him, he looked in good form as well.

I hope it's nothing too serious for him. I really think he was finding some good form heading into the Tour of California soon.
 
May 20, 2009
8,934
7
17,495
It wasn't that bad. :)

"El equipo BMC ha remitido información sobre el abandono de Tejay Van Garderen: el estadounidense chocó con un árbol en el descenso del Col des Mosses y sufrió heridas en la cara. Su participación en el Giro, a priori, no peligra."
 
May 20, 2009
8,934
7
17,495
search said:
Giro di California or what are they talking about?
ha ha...I guess :D

BMC Racing Team (Giro): Alessandro Ballan, Marco Pinotti, Mauro Santambrogio, Ivan Santaromita, Thor Hushovd, Taylor Phinney, Mathias Frank, Johann Tschopp y Danilo Wyss.