Transfers and Rumours 2012 > 2013

Page 141 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Mar 11, 2009
10,062
1
22,485
From a usually very reliable source, Mick Rogers IS going to Saxo.

Well, wouldn't his 2 year contract be voided if he couldn't/wouldn't sign that other piece of paper?
 
May 5, 2011
7,621
288
17,880
DominicDecoco said:
Oh. dear..

If anyone praises this signing you might want to check/delete your posts in the Sky-thread in the Clinic from time around July in order not to look completely deluded...

Never ever critiziced Micky ;):D
 
Feb 20, 2010
33,064
15,268
28,180
Why? Saxo are getting a guy who won 3 World Time Trial Championships whilst racing for the likes of T-Mobile and training with Ferrari, then put out his best ever numbers clean!

Uniting him with Riis, he will surely win the Tour

/sarcasm
/post that should probably have been in the Clinic
 
May 5, 2011
7,621
288
17,880
Libertine Seguros said:
Why? Saxo are getting a guy who won 3 World Time Trial Championships whilst racing for the likes of T-Mobile and training with Ferrari, then put out his best ever numbers clean!

Uniting him with Riis, he will surely win the Tour

/sarcasm
/post that should probably have been in the Clinic

Marginal gains at team Saxo is so marginal that he will improve even more for sure ;)
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
DominicDecoco said:
Oh. dear..

If anyone praises this signing you might want to check/delete your posts in the Sky-thread in the Clinic from time around July in order not to look completely deluded...

Mick Mick Mick Mick
winner.gif
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
Was rogers maybe signed for the wt points (dauphine podium) or did the signing perhaps take place too late.
 
Mar 19, 2009
2,119
564
13,080
I
e3e2447ee24d8c88269ca0570332a60e.jpeg
understand this transfer.

But I have actually been a fan of Micks since back in his early Mapei days, so even though I don't like yet another d-link at Saxo, I can't say I'm overly annoyed if he is the guy joining.
 
May 5, 2011
7,621
288
17,880
Kazistuta said:
I
e3e2447ee24d8c88269ca0570332a60e.jpeg
understand this transfer.

But I have actually been a fan of Micks since back in his early Mapei days, so even though I don't like yet another d-link at Saxo, I can't say I'm overly annoyed if he is the guy joining.

why not?
very strong tter at his best, can climb almost at the level of Kreuziger and probably just as good or better than Roche
 
Aug 5, 2010
11,027
89
22,580
Vino attacks everyone said:
why not?
very strong tter at his best, can climb almost at the level of Kreuziger and probably just as good or better than Roche

ya. . . right. one bad day and kreuziger is all of a sudden a mediocre rider
 
Oct 23, 2009
5,772
0
17,480
Libertine Seguros said:
Why? Saxo are getting a guy who won 3 World Time Trial Championships whilst racing for the likes of T-Mobile and training with Ferrari, then put out his best ever numbers clean!

Uniting him with Riis, he will surely win the Tour

/sarcasm
/post that should probably have been in the Clinic
Do you really believe that the numbers Rogers was producing in Dauphine whilst not being able to drop the likes of Weening, were better than those he produced when he became world champion in the age of doping? Just because he said his watt output was "higher than ever", that doesn't mean it's true.

Of course he couldn't say: "Nah actually, my FTP was 100 watts higher when I was 23!"
 
May 5, 2011
7,621
288
17,880
Parrulo said:
ya. . . right. one bad day and kreuziger is all of a sudden a mediocre rider

that is why I said almost.
Honestly if Rogers was the captain for Sky this year he would probably done a top 10 in the tour. You cant say that Kreuziger would have done anything better, and I like Kreuziger (not as a captain for my Astana, but still)
 
Aug 19, 2011
9,049
3,323
23,180
Vino attacks everyone said:
that is why I said almost.
Honestly if Rogers was the captain for Sky this year he would probably done a top 10 in the tour. You cant say that Kreuziger would have done anything better, and I like Kreuziger (not as a captain for my Astana, but still)

Rogers was one of the key domestiques in this year tour and dauphine, and he would have been the same for 2013. but i think Sky gladly let him go, instead of asking him to sign the doping statement etc etc
 
Jan 11, 2010
15,613
4,551
28,180
maltiv said:
Do you really believe that the numbers Rogers was producing in Dauphine whilst not being able to drop the likes of Weening, were better than those he produced when he became world champion in the age of doping? Just because he said his watt output was "higher than ever", that doesn't mean it's true.

Of course he couldn't say: "Nah actually, my FTP was 100 watts higher when I was 23!"
Weening was the only odd one out (or odd one in, if you like). And Weening used to be the next Dutch Tour winner ;)

He did drop the likes of Nibali, to name just one. Or in fact I think Porte did. And who knows, maybe Rogers really was stronger than ever. The clinic years are still in his legs, of course.
 
Sep 8, 2009
15,306
3
22,485
is it already official, the mick's move?
i expected bjarne to save garzelli or di luca to be honest so i'm kind of disappointed.it makes sense though. they have kiry now
kiry will be strong as 20 micks, ekis and hincapies.
 
Mar 19, 2009
2,119
564
13,080
Vino attacks everyone said:
why not?
very strong tter at his best, can climb almost at the level of Kreuziger and probably just as good or better than Roche

It has nothing to do with his "level". I just think that a team like Saxo need as much positive (not in a bad way though ;)) media attention as possible, especially when this transfer won't have any effect on the WT card decision (except maybe in the ethical department).

As stated before, I really like Mick, and his riding style is very elegant (was so sad when he crashed in the tour while on his way to take the yellow jersey back in the T-Mobile days), but considering the doping allegations surrounding Saxo/Riis I'd say a rider with less clinic material than Rogers would be better.

On the other hand one could argue that with Contador on board there's no real need to play the "clean team" card anymore.

But let's wait and see if it IS Michael Rogers after all....
 
Mar 27, 2011
6,135
7
17,495
I am happy in a sense that Rogers has moved, now i will not have to dislike him and Sky's train. In fact i liked all of Sky's big 4 this calendar year but i hated their tactics and how Wiggins basically won just on that.
 
Jan 3, 2011
4,594
0
0
jens_attacks said:
is it already official, the mick's move?
i expected bjarne to save garzelli or di luca to be honest so i'm kind of disappointed.it makes sense though. they have kiry now
kiry will be strong as 20 micks, ekis and hincapies.

Apparently it wont be made official untill after the last WT spots have been distributed
 
Jul 10, 2009
609
36
10,030
maltiv said:
Do you really believe that the numbers Rogers was producing in Dauphine whilst not being able to drop the likes of Weening, were better than those he produced when he became world champion in the age of doping? Just because he said his watt output was "higher than ever", that doesn't mean it's true.

Of course he couldn't say: "Nah actually, my FTP was 100 watts higher when I was 23!"

Let's trust an assumption by someone on the internet, instead of what the rider says. Why would Rogers lie? If his watt output didn't increase he wouldn't say a thing. Well, at least that would make more sense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.