Transfers and Rumours 2013 > 2014

Page 42 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Aug 13, 2013
31
0
0
murali said:
if euskatel team merges with some american team, then what will happen to the existing riders?

I think this is unlikely to happen, the light of day looks to be almost out on Euskaltel. However, if it did then most likely only a handful of riders would need to dropped since many of the american teams are small and have only about 12-15 riders, some of which might not want to/be ready to go to the WT just yet so they would probably sign somewhere else anyways.
 
Aug 16, 2013
7,620
2
0
bikeracer33 said:
I think this is unlikely to happen, the light of day looks to be almost out on Euskaltel. However, if it did then most likely only a handful of riders would need to dropped since many of the american teams are small and have only about 12-15 riders, some of which might not want to/be ready to go to the WT just yet so they would probably sign somewhere else anyways.

There are some strong rumours that Euskaltel is gonna to form one team together with Lampre-Merida. If this is the case, some riders can stay with the team, but i don't think the likes of Anton en Nieve are going to wait for that conformation.
 
Arredondo said:
There are some strong rumours that Euskaltel is gonna to form one team together with Lampre-Merida. If this is the case, some riders can stay with the team, but i don't think the likes of Anton en Nieve are going to wait for that conformation.


All the good Euskaltel riders (Landa, Sanchez, Izagirre², Anton, Nieve, Astarloza) still have a contract for 2014 so if they'll have to stay
 
Feb 15, 2011
1,306
0
0
Billie said:
All the good Euskaltel riders (Landa, Sanchez, Izagirre², Anton, Nieve, Astarloza) still have a contract for 2014 so if they'll have to stay

Landa has already signed for Astana...
 
One Man Grupetto said:
That is exactly as I understand it. For example, their energy gel's were specially developed from a firm in Switzerland and each costs about £200. Sky go on a lot about marginal gains but a lot of these come at a substantial cost which some teams choose not to invest it and which the others do not have the financial ability to invest in.

This is a joke I hope. The £200 thing.
 
gustienordic said:
Landa has already signed for Astana...


They have an agreement. Just like Izagirre's with Movistar. But if Euskaltel continues, they'll have to stay. Contracts that still run after a team folds (those guys for Euskaltel, De Gendt amongst others for Vacansoleil) will be cleered by their old teams at the 1st September if they don't continue.
 
Mar 13, 2009
5,245
2
0
Some news from Trek and some of my own opinions...

George Bennett is out of contract (source: Hayden Roulston twitter). IMO RSLT made a mistake by lining him up for the Giro, they should have had him do the Vuelta instead. A good climber but he spent 1 year getting acustomed to the ProTour and now he got some good results but not enough apparently. Maybe he can turn things around with a win in Colorado but I don't know if that would suffice... He is maybe another victim of Trek re-shifting its focus to the classics, or they are hoping to replace him with Arredondo. On the other hand he would be cheap to keep in comparison to some others and can get good results in the American races that should be important to the sponsor. But it seems they don't really care about those since they are also letting Horner go, according to what a forum-user posted some days ago!

Jesse Sergent has his future secured (source: Dirk Demol on the team website). I assume this means he will stay with Trek. No results in the last two years but showed his class in the Eneco TT. IMO he is too much of a specialist, meaning he needs the exact right course to be successful, and even then there are usually one or two riders better than him. I don't know if he will ever confirm his 2011 season.

It looks like the team is up for a major re-shaping, again. So far they have 5 new riders confirmed, 3 neo pro's plus Felline and Beppu. If they sign the two Van Poppels, which seems likely as there does not seem to be another rumour, it will be 7, plus maybe Arredondo and Kristian Haugaard. With 9 new riders they would again switch out half of the team - a bad decision IMO. But maybe they have to because a lot of riders have better offers, such as Gallopin, Monfort, Nizzolo.

My take on Nizzolo is that I hope they can keep him, and I interprete the signings of Felline and Alafaci as a positive sign, maybe they were signed to work with Nizzolo and become the Italian sprinting force of the team. Otherwise the signing of Alafaci does not make that much sense unless he is part of a sprint train IMO, since he is not at all a winner (a total of 1 win in two years at the Continental level).

Overall the signings are quite "weak" in comparison to their current team, meaning there almost only neo-pros or riders from ProConti teams. The Van Poppels of course would be killer signings but even they are still at the beginning of their career. To me this means that they are trying to widen the team (I think if you have 4 neo-pro's you can have a maximum of 32 riders), and thus compete in more smaller races and hope to get wins there with Felline, Van Poppels, Silvestre, maybe Nizzolo. For example now they had no team in Tour de l'Ain, Burgos, Norway... They have almost only competed at the highest level races all year and gotten almost no results except for Cancellara of course. So my interpretation of their transfer politics is that they are focusing everything on Cancellara while trying to get wins in smaller races.

Or they just have a much lower budget and have to sign "cheaper" riders? I think this is also a big part of it.
 
Christian said:
Some news from Trek and some of my own opinions...

George Bennett is out of contract (source: Hayden Roulston twitter). IMO RSLT made a mistake by lining him up for the Giro, they should have had him do the Vuelta instead. A good climber but he spent 1 year getting acustomed to the ProTour and now he got some good results but not enough apparently. Maybe he can turn things around with a win in Colorado but I don't know if that would suffice... He is maybe another victim of Trek re-shifting its focus to the classics, or they are hoping to replace him with Arredondo. On the other hand he would be cheap to keep in comparison to some others and can get good results in the American races that should be important to the sponsor. But it seems they don't really care about those since they are also letting Horner go, according to what a forum-user posted some days ago!

Jesse Sergent has his future secured (source: Dirk Demol on the team website). I assume this means he will stay with Trek. No results in the last two years but showed his class in the Eneco TT. IMO he is too much of a specialist, meaning he needs the exact right course to be successful, and even then there are usually one or two riders better than him. I don't know if he will ever confirm his 2011 season.

It looks like the team is up for a major re-shaping, again. So far they have 5 new riders confirmed, 3 neo pro's plus Felline and Beppu. If they sign the two Van Poppels, which seems likely as there does not seem to be another rumour, it will be 7, plus maybe Arredondo and Kristian Haugaard. With 9 new riders they would again switch out half of the team - a bad decision IMO. But maybe they have to because a lot of riders have better offers, such as Gallopin, Monfort, Nizzolo.

My take on Nizzolo is that I hope they can keep him, and I interprete the signings of Felline and Alafaci as a positive sign, maybe they were signed to work with Nizzolo and become the Italian sprinting force of the team. Otherwise the signing of Alafaci does not make that much sense unless he is part of a sprint train IMO, since he is not at all a winner (a total of 1 win in two years at the Continental level).

Overall the signings are quite "weak" in comparison to their current team, meaning there almost only neo-pros or riders from ProConti teams. The Van Poppels of course would be killer signings but even they are still at the beginning of their career. To me this means that they are trying to widen the team (I think if you have 4 neo-pro's you can have a maximum of 32 riders), and thus compete in more smaller races and hope to get wins there with Felline, Van Poppels, Silvestre, maybe Nizzolo. For example now they had no team in Tour de l'Ain, Burgos, Norway... They have almost only competed at the highest level races all year and gotten almost no results except for Cancellara of course. So my interpretation of their transfer politics is that they are focusing everything on Cancellara while trying to get wins in smaller races.

Or they just have a much lower budget and have to sign "cheaper" riders? I think this is also a big part of it.

Bennett would be a good addition to Greenedge now that they want to focus a little bit more on climbing. The guy certainly has some talent. However I dont know if there is room at Greenedge as there were already some rumours of riders joining and havent heared much about guys leaving.
 
Mar 13, 2009
2,890
0
0
Gloin22 said:
LOl. Graeme Brown resings for Belkin ?

What idiot made that decision in that team..

Maybe he's holding onto a little info noone wants to be public? Honestly I can't logically fathom the decision beyond that.
 
Jun 4, 2013
143
0
0
Tinkoff is considering buying Euskatel license, but he would move the team base to Italy and he wants stronger riders.
 
Apr 10, 2011
4,818
0
0
Too late to start a new team from scratch for next year.

Buying off Euskaltel gives him a core of riders, plus he can buy riders from folding teams or just riders with contracts ending.
 
Jun 4, 2013
143
0
0
Gloin22 said:
Too late to start a new team from scratch for next year.

Buying off Euskaltel gives him a core of riders, plus he can buy riders from folding teams or just riders with contracts ending.

But would you really want to ride in his team, guess he needs to shut down his Twitter account before some guys would sign up..