Broccolidwarf said:
SafeBet said:
Being THE guy might be a good way to never win anything relevant if your team is worthless.
Put Valgren in the same group at Omloop, with no teammates, and he probably doesn't win the race. Astana was perfect that day.
I agree to disagree
there are only 3 ways to win a classique:
1. you are 'invisible' (i.e. no one cares) and somehow make it to the line ... then a team like DD might be good enough, but once you have a track record (have won something in the past), your visibility rises, so surprise attacks will be more and more difficult ... you might well end up being the one race wonder ....
2. you are the guy who can win races like Gilbert won Flanders 2017 or Sagan Paris-Roubaix 2018 ... unless you actually are Gilbert or Sagan, it's highly unlikely you fall in this category ...
3. you are the or one of the 'protected riders' in a strong team, which can support you all the way to the final attack .... Quick Step won most of it's races this year, because their top riders were brought to were the game was decided within the last 30k, and they had various options in there, whereas other top tier riders were by the time on their own ... e.g. Sagan lost Flanders rather to Quick Step than to Terpstra alone (albeight the latter was admittedly very strong in that race) mostly because he had no teammate in the finale (having used up Oss a bit earlier) - when he had Burghardt seconding him to the line (Gent-Wevelgem) he won (I'm sure without Burghardt he would not have) ...
so in a nutshell: in classics, unless you are happy with a one off lucky strike, you will need the best possible team around you to win regularly (and of course the best possible team will only take you as the man they ride for, if you have a excellent track record of delivering ...)