- Feb 16, 2011
- 1,456
- 5
- 0
roadfreak44 said:Quitter? Au contraire. One thing aobut Armstrong is he always takes the most likely outcome to success. In this case that means not allowing whatever evidence is available to come to light but rather to stall for the issue to be addressed in a different less biased court wherein his teams eyes the outcome might be more favorable. What I find puzzling is that everyone acts as if this is the final outcome. Armstrongs team is very experienced and if theres one thing we can be sure of it is that we can be sure the fight isnt over just yet. A possible scenario is that the UCI steps in questions th eban on prcedural gorunds of one sort or another then it goes to CAS And they offer that USADA overstepped its mandate. Im not rooting for that just offering that as a possible outcome as it is...Then Armstrong has a legal footing to sue USADA and Hamilton and Landis for defamation. He wouldnt go after Landis who is penniless but Tyler was undoubtedly given a nice fat advance which he would then have to turn around and burn up on legal defense. Youmight get to see Lance Versus tyler and his dog "(was it binky?) This is a temporary judgement offered by USADA and its not over til the UCI and CAS weighs in which I am sure their attorneys are working overtime trying to figure which end of the body to stick out the hole first...
I'd like to pinpoint the exact moment otherwise good people jettisoned their interest in right and wrong, guilt and innocence for plain, vulgar ol' winning and losing.
If it were always thus, we'd have no concept of good.