Tyler's Book

Page 10 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Feb 23, 2011
618
0
0
roadfreak44 said:
misinfirmed? really? so Floyd iddnt file in federal court for rat money? and tyler didint wait till he had a ook deal in the works to "confess"" and that book cover doesnt show a pic of Greg Lemond? and the lawyers that landis got when he was flat broke to protect him form a lawsuit by LA and whose retainer is in the $200,000 range and were they NOT Lemonds lawyers as well during hsi Ill ge tlance phase? Gosh unblike you , i must be totally misinformed. I dont have a problem with LA being investigated there is somethign mroe than a little fishy about the tour de swisse thing, I just have a proilem with two self serving mercenary weasels like these offering allegations as evidence. As one forum poster offered i would like to see some facts, some prescriptions billos paid for drugs etc. if there is any truth to the many thousands of allegations posted on the forum then surely there is some small bit of evidence as well. You liek so many potehrs are qiuick to judge based upon your OPINION> opinions are like *******s everones got one. so what?TYler saying so to get a book deal doesnt make it so...in any court of law there has to be more than howler monkeys yelping there has to be soemthing called evidence. I f people are to be pilooried in a court of opinion then everyone is guilty by reason of thoise =that bear personal enmity. ..l am all for LA and bruyneel being hung by their toes til they rot if found guilty but they need to actually introduce some evidence. Out of the last twenty people executed in NC five were later exonerated as innocent because of wrong evidence- most of it hearsay. .is that clear enough for you?

A couple of links for you

1. Oxford English Dictionary: http://oxforddictionaries.com/
2. How to use spelling and grammer check in word http://http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/word-help/choose-how-spell-check-and-grammar-check-work-HP010354280.aspx
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
roadfreak44 said:
misinfirmed? really? so Floyd iddnt file in federal court for rat money? and tyler didint wait till he had a ook deal in the works to "confess"" and that book cover doesnt show a pic of Greg Lemond? and the lawyers that landis got when he was flat broke to protect him form a lawsuit by LA and whose retainer is in the $200,000 range and were they NOT Lemonds lawyers as well during hsi Ill ge tlance phase? Gosh unblike you , i must be totally misinformed. I dont have a problem with LA being investigated there is somethign mroe than a little fishy about the tour de swisse thing, I just have a proilem with two self serving mercenary weasels like these offering allegations as evidence. As one forum poster offered i would like to see some facts, some prescriptions billos paid for drugs etc. if there is any truth to the many thousands of allegations posted on the forum then surely there is some small bit of evidence as well. You liek so many potehrs are qiuick to judge based upon your OPINION> opinions are like *******s everones got one. so what?TYler saying so to get a book deal doesnt make it so...in any court of law there has to be more than howler monkeys yelping there has to be soemthing called evidence. I f people are to be pilooried in a court of opinion then everyone is guilty by reason of thoise =that bear personal enmity. ..l am all for LA and bruyneel being hung by their toes til they rot if found guilty but they need to actually introduce some evidence. Out of the last twenty people executed in NC five were later exonerated as innocent because of wrong evidence- most of it hearsay. .is that clear enough for you?

I thought Tyler Hamilton had the right of free speech!

Dont worry, Armstrong is not going to hang from a gibbet for the sport of his own minions.

All he will have to do is give back some trophies he cheated a lot of peeps out of, a good few bucks in winnings to be returned including some bonus payments and hang his steroid fueled head in shame for the rest of his natural days.
 
Jun 20, 2009
81
0
0
Benotti69 said:
I thought Tyler Hamilton had the right of free speech!

Dont worry, Armstrong is not going to hang from a gibbet for the sport of his own minions.

All he will have to do is give back some trophies he cheated a lot of peeps out of, a good few bucks in winnings to be returned including some bonus payments and hang his steroid fueled head in shame for the rest of his natural days.
sorry to one and all for my abusnmal typing i am leaglleally blind after head injuuries casued by a motoriust who ran me over when eh came thru a stop soign at 60mph...noenhtesll in spite of my abysmal typing the point is that la or anyone shouldnt be judged until the proof of the pudding is evident.
Anyone who would point to the "proof" that landis and hamilton offer is deluded.
After hundreds fo denials thye both come "Clean: however even to the most casual of observers it is apparent that they are still not anywhere close to "clean..." or believable..until there si sokme evidence I am goign to stick woith inncoient until proven guilty not fo rany love of lance but simply fo the fact thta it prevents salem form happening on a regular basis. some here would prefer nazi germany wher eif you werent liked and had friends in the state deaprtment you coudl get anyone convicted for anything. I am all for the conviction with evidence model though as in the case of NC where 25% of the last convicts executed were innocent even alleged
evidence doesnt actually always equal guilty.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
hrotha said:
Could you please draw a red circle around LeMond in the cover? He's harder to find than Waldo.
And your answer is.....
roadfreak44 said:
sorry to one and all for my abusnmal typing i am leaglleally blind after head injuuries casued by a motoriust who ran me over when eh came thru a stop soign at 60mph...

<snip>
 
May 14, 2010
5,303
4
0
roadfreak44 said:
sorry to one and all for my abusnmal typing i am leaglleally blind after head injuuries casued by a motoriust who ran me over when eh came thru a stop soign at 60mph...noenhtesll in spite of my abysmal typing the point is that la or anyone shouldnt be judged until the proof of the pudding is evident.
Anyone who would point to the "proof" that landis and hamilton offer is deluded.
After hundreds fo denials thye both come "Clean: however even to the most casual of observers it is apparent that they are still not anywhere close to "clean..." or believable..until there si sokme evidence I am goign to stick woith inncoient until proven guilty not fo rany love of lance but simply fo the fact thta it prevents salem form happening on a regular basis. some here would prefer nazi germany wher eif you werent liked and had friends in the state deaprtment you coudl get anyone convicted for anything. I am all for the conviction with evidence model though as in the case of NC where 25% of the last convicts executed were innocent even alleged
evidence doesnt actually always equal guilty.

Here's another link for you.

Setting up dictation/speech recognition software built into Windows:

http://youtu.be/jgPVOHeA7LM
 
Jun 16, 2009
647
0
0
roadfreak44 said:
i dotn have aproblem with anypone tellign the truth what i have a problem with is tow people who change their stories repeatedly to fit their economic needs at the time and then everyone gets all teary eyed about these self serving "truth" tellers. I donated to floyds truth fund and it turns out he lied then also . now i am to believe him when he wants to make money off this as well??? If either of these clowns came clean before they were busted I could believe them but when they come clean just as they file in federal court for bounty money and a book deal...isnt the situation just SLIGHTLY obvious? these are not remorseful or truthful individuals that have a conscience of any sort...they are liars highly motivated by mercenary considerations. dont think ANYONE can dispute that. these are the kind of people we can trust to tell the truth now? Lenmonds poic on the fornt of tylers book is no coincidence...lemond also paid for Floyds lawyers...If lance falls thta leaves greg as the sole american tdf champion...70,000 pages submitted by lemond to novitsky sum it up pretty well....Greg hates lance......

I think Lance hates Greg more.

It's easy to know when cyclists are lying about doping - this happens when they deny it. In virtually all instances when they have decided to admit to doping they have told the truth, regardless of book deals.

By the way, i don't think Tyler will make very much money from this book. Maybe not even as much as The Sociopath spends on lawyers in a 1/2 day.
 
Oct 22, 2009
66
0
0
Jeremiah said:
repeating this. Legally speaking not realistic? Why not?

The truth is an absolute defense to libel. There is often no better promotional material for book sales than getting sued by some jerk to keep the truth hidden.

Because you don't have, or don't want to spend, $2 million defending yourself against a libel suit. Your vindication will be cold comfort when the money's gone. A publishing company might be willing to put out a book with statements that are likely to attract libel suits if (i) they are confident the statements are true and (ii) the expected profits from the book are enough to make the cost of defending the libel suits worthwhile. Unfortunately, I'm betting that (ii) is missing in this case.
 
Aug 3, 2010
843
1
0
steevo said:
I personally would never trust a word he says. Anybody who took
that many drugs and continued to lie years afterwards for no reason
obviously has mental health issues. Rock Racing? He said that he was
going to come back after his (wrongful) ban and win the tour. Instead
he came back doped up and raced for Rock Racing and won USPRO.
Very close.

First off, please show us where and when he said that he was going to come back and win the tour.

Secondly, the story of Micheal Ball and Rock Racing is another one that needs to be exposed and I hope that is part of the book.

To all of you who are questioning his integrity due to the fact that he publicly tried to hide his misdeeds with lies, and now is coming clean with open and honest discourse; don't buy the book. That is the best form of protest for those of you that are so far removed from any knowledge of what it is and was like to be him on a daiy basis. If he feels the need to get these FACTS off of his, chest so be it. Maybe while you are at the book store protesting, you can get a refund for all 5 of LA's "truthfull" books that were of course not published to make himself money, they saved little kids with cancer:rolleyes:

In the words of Kepler, "sometimes it takes a cart load of dung, to rid the world of a larger cartload of dung."
 
Aug 3, 2010
843
1
0
Speedzero said:
Because you don't have, or don't want to spend, $2 million defending yourself against a libel suit. Your vindication will be cold comfort when the money's gone. A publishing company might be willing to put out a book with statements that are likely to attract libel suits if (i) they are confident the statements are true and (ii) the expected profits from the book are enough to make the cost of defending the libel suits worthwhile. Unfortunately, I'm betting that (ii) is missing in this case.

Lance's publishers must have banked on (ii). Hope their legal departments are sharpening their pencils. If the "Cup of Tea" fraud's publisher found herself in legal trouble, (allowed by a judge to be named in lawsuits), my guess is that LA's publisher(s) are figuring out how they can pin it all on him. Could be another fun aspect of the coming fallout.
 
Oct 22, 2009
66
0
0
spetsa said:
Lance's publishers must have banked on (ii). Hope their legal departments are sharpening their pencils. If the "Cup of Tea" fraud's publisher found herself in legal trouble, (allowed by a judge to be named in lawsuits), my guess is that LA's publisher(s) are figuring out how they can pin it all on him. Could be another fun aspect of the coming fallout.

Sorry, I'm confused. I was talking about Tyler's book. What book of LA's are you thinking of?
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
the big ring said:
Yeah dude - that twinkies diet is doing you no favours.

I keep checking slowtwit for more trey shenanigans, but see none - you finished there?

I wonder what kind of market really exists for this book? Any sales numbers on previous doping-slanted tomes?

Right now I am on a "whatever I eat has an express train through my digestive system" diet...but even outside of that, not into twinkies...and it sounds like you are suggesting I am fat...not sure where you are getting that? 5'11 185...but yea, I am not the 140 I was when I was young and racing.

I posted over at Slowditch a few days ago regarding the fact that the USADA backed the argument I made before they had filed their motion to dismiss. Lots of the lawyers had tried to suggest that I was just some stupid law student who didn't understand how things work in the real world...funny, the guys with skin in the game used the exact reasoning I was using, so I guess their "real world" is just some sideline feces throwing. Anyway, I didn't get many responses to my post as most of them are still wiping the egg off their faces.
 
Jan 3, 2011
4,594
0
0
B_Ugli said:
It will be interesting what he reveals. Not being part of the pro circus any more and not needing to win any favours could make it quite interesting.

I read the Miller book which gave an interesting insight into the guys personality but on the drugs side was fairly cryptic. It was almost as if he was holding back on dishing the dirt/naming names for fear of reprisal.

With this and the ongoing LA saga I cannot see the McQuaid and the UCI being able to continue, but how can they be sanctioned?

Miller have a lot more credability imo. Hamilton and his story about unborn twin doesnt exactly boost his credability. In addition he is bitter and to boost earning he would be tempted to make things a little more dramatic. That said, there should be alot of interesting stuff in there.
 
May 27, 2011
21
0
0
Sales of other tell-all's and the like

You're not gonna rich in the cycling-tell-all book game. Here are sales numbers from the industry website, Bookscan, for books of this type.

Positively False hardcover (no p/b) 16,416 sold @ $24.95
Lance Armstrong's War hardcover 77,498 sold @ $25.95
Lance Armstrong's War paperback 27,790 sold @ $14.99
From Lance to Landis hardcover (no p/b) 11,590 @$24.95

I'd guess that they'd be lucky if they actually earned their advances back, except for Coyle. Most authors get a 7.5% royalty on h/c sales and 10% on paper, maybe a little higher. So here's what they would have received in royalties.

$30,718 Positively False
$150,830 L.A.W. h/c
$41,657 L.A.W. p/b
$21,687 From Lance to Landis

Coyle made some money for himself and publisher. But Coyle and Tyler will be splitting the pot this time around so I don't see either one buying an island in the Caribbean anytime soon. Most other titles were published before Bookscan started tracking books sales in 2001. And the ones I listed here far outsold titles like the ones on Pantani, Bad Blood, Fignon, 7-Eleven, etc.
 
Jan 3, 2011
4,594
0
0
soverylarry said:
You're not gonna rich in the cycling-tell-all book game. Here are sales numbers from the industry website, Bookscan, for books of this type.

Positively False hardcover (no p/b) 16,416 sold @ $24.95
Lance Armstrong's War hardcover 77,498 sold @ $25.95
Lance Armstrong's War paperback 27,790 sold @ $14.99
From Lance to Landis hardcover (no p/b) 11,590 @$24.95

I'd guess that they'd be lucky if they actually earned their advances back, except for Coyle. Most authors get a 7.5% royalty on h/c sales and 10% on paper, maybe a little higher. So here's what they would have received in royalties.

$30,718 Positively False
$150,830 L.A.W. h/c
$41,657 L.A.W. p/b
$21,687 From Lance to Landis

Coyle made some money for himself and publisher. But Coyle and Tyler will be splitting the pot this time around so I don't see either one buying an island in the Caribbean anytime soon. Most other titles were published before Bookscan started tracking books sales in 2001. And the ones I listed here far outsold titles like the ones on Pantani, Bad Blood, Fignon, 7-Eleven, etc.

This one is different though, if he does tell about everyone. But if it wasnt the the money he could just give it away. The whole timing just screams that he wanna max sales. Like a new videogame being released just before xmas just so the kids will be bug u to death to buy it. I will buy this book tho ;)
 
May 19, 2012
537
0
0
Speedzero said:
Because you don't have, or don't want to spend, $2 million defending yourself against a libel suit. Your vindication will be cold comfort when the money's gone. A publishing company might be willing to put out a book with statements that are likely to attract libel suits if (i) they are confident the statements are true and (ii) the expected profits from the book are enough to make the cost of defending the libel suits worthwhile. Unfortunately, I'm betting that (ii) is missing in this case.


Oh, he wouldn't have to spend a dime defending himself against this much less $2 M.

Al Franken's "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them," was about to languish in obscurity until that jackas$ bill o'reilly persuaded faux to sue Franken.

The book, (very funny btw) shot right up to number 1. Armstrong or anyone else would have to be insane to sue Hamilton. I'm sure right now, as I write this, Hamilton is praying for a lawsuit from some imbecile.

Some First Amendment lawyer would no doubt take this on a contingency and the case would be summarily dismissed and literally laughed out of court as was o'reilly's idiocy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/23/n...hter-at-fox-and-a-victory-for-al-franken.html

In short, you've got to be effing kidding me.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
1
0
soverylarry said:
You're not gonna rich in the cycling-tell-all book game. Here are sales numbers from the industry website, Bookscan, for books of this type.

Positively False hardcover (no p/b) 16,416 sold @ $24.95
Lance Armstrong's War hardcover 77,498 sold @ $25.95
Lance Armstrong's War paperback 27,790 sold @ $14.99
From Lance to Landis hardcover (no p/b) 11,590 @$24.95

I'd guess that they'd be lucky if they actually earned their advances back, except for Coyle. Most authors get a 7.5% royalty on h/c sales and 10% on paper, maybe a little higher. So here's what they would have received in royalties.

$30,718 Positively False
$150,830 L.A.W. h/c
$41,657 L.A.W. p/b
$21,687 From Lance to Landis

Coyle made some money for himself and publisher. But Coyle and Tyler will be splitting the pot this time around so I don't see either one buying an island in the Caribbean anytime soon. Most other titles were published before Bookscan started tracking books sales in 2001. And the ones I listed here far outsold titles like the ones on Pantani, Bad Blood, Fignon, 7-Eleven, etc.

David Walsh made $55,000 on Lance to Landis
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/it...secret-race-to-be-released-on-lances-birthday

“I think when people learn how it really was -- how it worked, how we did it, what it felt like -- they'll see that this story is bigger than any one individual in the sport,” Hamilton said in the news release. “It's really about making choices when you’re pushed to the edge and deciding what you’re willing to do to compete. I want to take people inside our world so they can understand the lives we lived."
 
thehog said:
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/it...secret-race-to-be-released-on-lances-birthday

“I think when people learn how it really was -- how it worked, how we did it, what it felt like -- they'll see that this story is bigger than any one individual in the sport,” Hamilton said in the news release. “It's really about making choices when you’re pushed to the edge and deciding what you’re willing to do to compete. I want to take people inside our world so they can understand the lives we lived."

It sounds like a bit more than a story of depression.