DirtyWorks said:We just know they dusted off some positives to give watchers a reason for denying the license.
That would require a pretty vast conspiracy involving the Dutch and the AFLD as the caught the Astana riders, not the UCI
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
DirtyWorks said:We just know they dusted off some positives to give watchers a reason for denying the license.
well, if Interpol are targeting a criminal, they'll send out a description of that criminal to smaller agencies who can then join the search. Not much of a conspiracy. Perhaps UCI/WADA did something similar here?Race Radio said:That would require a pretty vast conspiracy involving the Dutch and the AFLD as the caught the Astana riders, not the UCI
sniper said:well, if Interpol are targeting a criminal, they'll send out a description of that criminal to smaller agencies who can then join the search. Not much of a conspiracy. Perhaps UCI/WADA did something similar here?
Perhaps UCI/Wada are sitting on some piece of intel (perhaps obtained through CIRC?) suggesting Astana is one of the last old school doping strongholds left in the peloton, with old school lunch boxes and all?
An old school French-type douane doping bust involving Astana would be very bad for UCI's business, so I could understand UCI trying to put them out of play if indeed they have such intel.
+1race radio said:if i have to choose between a conspiracy between the uci, wada, afld, and the dutch or the possibility that vino is running a dirty team.....i am going with occam's razor. Vino running a dirty team and got caught is easier to believe.
Red Rick said:What do the Dutch have to do with this?
Race Radio said:I kinda doubt Astana will lose license. They'll be put on probation. Katusha set legal precedent for this at CAS. Warning must be issued, first.
Red Rick said:What do the Dutch have to do with this?
Race Radio said:Both Astana teams have the same paying agent. http://www.uci.ch/mm/Document/News/...eamsparticipation-art.2.2.001-ENG_English.pdf
it's clearly not either/or...Race Radio said:If I have to choose between a conspiracy between the UCI, WADA, AFLD, and the Dutch or the possibility that Vino is running a dirty team.....I am going with Occam's razor. Vino running a dirty team and got caught is easier to believe.
sniper said:it's clearly not either/or...
we know (and knew well before the stream of positives) that he's running a dirty team.
only relevant question, imo, is whether or not UCI/WADA have put in an extra effort to grab Astana by the balls or whether Astana are just massively failing the IQ test.
Race Radio said:That would require a pretty vast conspiracy involving the Dutch and the AFLD as the caught the Astana riders, not the UCI
sniper said:it's clearly not either/or...
we know (and knew well before the stream of positives) that he's running a dirty team.
only relevant question, imo, is whether or not UCI/WADA have put in an extra effort to grab Astana by the balls or whether Astana are just massively failing the IQ test.
thehog said:There are two Iglinsky brothers. Miracles do happen as they were both tested for EPO 10 days apart in two different countries at two different races. One in Holland, one in Spain.
All whilst they were smashing up the field finshing 96th & 26th respectively.
Meanwhile at the 2012 Tour of Britan they decided not to run EPO tests....
Nice work UCI the haunting words of Hein reverberate... "I will make you positive"
pigoonse said:Are you saying that the Iglinsky bro's positive EPO tests were obtained in 2012...at the same time as the Tour of Britain? And if that is the case, why would they hold a positive test like that for two years?
just trying to understand
Dear Wiggo said:He's saying exactly what he wrote - there's nothing to understand.
The brothers were tested for EPO.
No EPO tests were done at Tour of Britain.
That's it.
Dear Wiggo said:He's saying exactly what he wrote - there's nothing to understand.
The brothers were tested for EPO.
No EPO tests were done at Tour of Britain.
That's it.
pigoonse said:I was trying to understand the timing of the tests, eg were they obtained in 2012 and held for 2 years?
nevermind...
Q:What do you do with them that does not exist 'fit and proper'?
A: (Cookson)- The ones we may refuse a license, so they can not take part in our sport. And if such a person in the management of a team, then this team will be sanctioned, says Brian Cookson.
- But I must stress that none of this of course is done without full legal backing.