Verbiest just said the corroborating evidence from 09 + 10 was ignored.
So the bio passport is a piece of ****
So the bio passport is a piece of ****
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
martinvickers said:The UCI is a swiss organisation, with a french name - it's actually more odd that McQuaid won't answer in french.
ValleyFlowers said:Which end did the noise issue from? top or bottom?
Descender said:Why can't the French journalists ask in English just like everybody else?
ValleyFlowers said:How can cycling go forward when some of the men involved with the running of teams are former dopers? "It is possible that people who have made mistakes in the past can help the sport in the future."
luckyboy said:Verbiest just said the corroborating evidence from 09 + 10 was ignored.
So the bio passport is a piece of ****
Philippe Verbiest, the UCI lawyer, in answer to a question about Landis's statements in the report and the UCI's decision to sue him previously. "The only problem UCI had with Floyd Landis was him saying the positive test had been covered up. There was no positive test," says Verbiest.Ryo Hazuki said:any questions yet about uci covering up positive tests of lance?
Ryo Hazuki said:any questions yet about uci covering up positive tests of lance?
webvan said:Came up when they mentioned Landis, as much as I hate UCI there does not seem to be any evidence that they did...now the antidoping machine and Verbruggen payoffs, well...