US prosecutors drop case against Armstrong/USPS

Page 37 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Race Radio said:
I hope you had your fun......now it is game on.

Did anyone really think they did not have anything on him? People are angry and people are talking.

People will always be angry and people always will talk. Debating what the GJ did or didn't discover is pointless now. That kind of an argument is just "I think they had enough to convict" vs. "I think they didn't have enough," with nobody knowing what the GJ actually had.

When I learn that the feds have shared with USADA, then I'll buy that a new game has begun. Until then, its game over.
 
Sep 5, 2009
1,239
0
0
DirtyWorks said:
Yes, but how is USADA funded? People motivated to pursue the case at USADA could be looking for work because of suddenly poor work performance. Congress critters could be concerned that USADA is over-stepping their mission and cut funding.

If a Federal Grand Jury Investigation can be shut down, who can possibly run defense for the USADA? And that's before USAC and UCI fight for Armstrong.

Funded partially but indirectly by the government and the balance from income derived from contract anti doping services for sports bodies.

If the US government hamstrung USADA by strangling its funding then the US would become the laughing stock of the sports world.

Lack of funds so no out of competition testing, hearing for US athletes delayed through lack of funds, etc.

USA would become the new Canary Islands and a training haven for international athletes avoiding their bodies' OOC's.
 
Mar 8, 2010
3,263
1
0
Polish said:
You are correct. Not a crime to dope in sport.
Novitsky said it himself.

But it IS a crime to leak GJ Testimony. Your best hope is to have Lance leak some GJ stuff to WADA/USADA. THAT would be a Federal Offense.
Jail time and boyfriends. Finally. Hope. Believe.

Polish, since you are a source of wisdom........now that another myth was destroyed, what do you think did really happen in the cachecache ?

Perhaps a thread ?

What really happened in the cachecache !
I know what you did in cachecache !
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
MarkvW said:
People will always be angry and people always will talk. Debating what the GJ did or didn't discover is pointless now. That kind of an argument is just "I think they had enough to convict" vs. "I think they didn't have enough," with nobody knowing what the GJ actually had.

When I learn that the feds have shared with USADA, then I'll buy that a new game has begun. Until then, its game over.

So we should not expect to see you in here till you learn that the feds have shared info with USADA :rolleyes:
 
Oct 25, 2010
3,049
2
0
Race Radio said:
I hope you had your fun......now it is game on.

Did anyone really think they did not have anything on him? People are angry and people are talking.

In other words: If you thought there were leaks before, just wait.
 
May 15, 2009
550
1
0
Phil Liggett on Armstrong affair

“He told me in a private situation, when I wasn’t working as a journalist. I was sat in the bedroom some years ago, and I asked him point blank, ‘look Lance, the way I talked you up on television, I would have to back off and resign if you one day went positive’. And he looked at me and he said ‘man I’ve seen death in the face and I don’t take drugs.’ And that’s all he said. I have no reason to disbelieve him.”

What a ****load of crap. Absolutely disgusting.
 
delicato said:
phil liggett on armstrong affair



what a ****load of crap. Absolutely disgusting.

omg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

“But I’ve been with him on his private jet when he’s been reading stuff on Cyclingnews and he’s gone, ‘god damn it look at what they’re saying about me again’ and he just passes his computer over to his friends.”
 
Jun 18, 2009
1,086
1
0
craig1985 said:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/liggett-on-armstrong-the-whole-investigation-was-a-waste-of-money

Am I the only one who thinks Liggett is becoming some sort of self-parody of himself? I suppose at least he isn't a hypocrite because he wasn't slagging off Valverde at the TDU.

+1..... I thought the same thing. He's and embarrassment and I wish he's just retire. He even found a way to mention some stupid Lance and Sheryl Crow story during the Australian nat'l titles a few weeks back. Aaaargh.........
 
May 6, 2009
8,522
1
0
thehog said:
omg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

“But I’ve been with him on his private jet when he’s been reading stuff on Cyclingnews and he’s gone, ‘god damn it look at what they’re saying about me again’ and he just passes his computer over to his friends.”

I take it then Lance reads this forum?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Mar 19, 2009
1,796
0
0
craig1985 said:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/liggett-on-armstrong-the-whole-investigation-was-a-waste-of-money

Am I the only one who thinks Liggett is becoming some sort of self-parody of himself? I suppose at least he isn't a hypocrite because he wasn't slagging off Valverde at the TDU.
I dont know why the investigators didnt just save a lot of time and effort and just ask mr ligget at the start it would have been solved so much quicker:S
..................................
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
Liggett on Armstrong: The whole investigation was a waste of money

Granville57 on Liggett: You, Sherwen and Roll are a complete joke. You three mouthpieces are an embarrassment to yourselves, the sport and anyone with even the slightest ability to think for themselves.

Carry on. Business as usual.
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
thehog said:
If someone told me a year ago that Andy Shleck would win the 2011 Tour, Contador would be rubbed out of the sport and not appear in 2012, Lance and Hog would be sponsoring the new Leopard and back in control at the Tour and all Federal charges against Armstrong would be dropped I would have laughed at them.

But that’s where we are today.

Life.

The only thing that would have made this week "better" were if LA had managed 2nd in the 2010 TdF, then he could go around clucking about his "8th" Tour win! Complete with all the pomp and pageantry that NBC Sports would provide.

That would've been awesome.
 
May 18, 2009
3,757
0
0
Granville57 said:
The only thing that would have made this week "better" were if LA had managed 2nd in the 2010 TdF, then he could go around clucking about his "8th" Tour win! Complete with all the pomp and pageantry that NBC Sports would provide.

That would've been awesome.

LOL. I could imagine the heads exploding in here if he was second in 2010 and got elevated to first. :D
 
Jun 15, 2009
8,529
1
0
Granville57 said:
The only thing that would have made this week "better" were if LA had managed 2nd in the 2010 TdF, then he could go around clucking about his "8th" Tour win! Complete with all the pomp and pageantry that NBC Sports would provide.

That would've been awesome.

Thanks to Floyd that he took the concentration away from him and basically spoiled his comeback II. Otherwise we indeed may would have had to deal with his 8th "win".

After all not everything went wrong.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
hehehe

A few years from now Lance is going to look back and say "remember those couple days of peace we had before it all hit the fan?"
 
Sep 5, 2009
1,239
0
0
thehog said:
Question; as I value your opinion.

Can the case be reopened? ie Can Nov take it higher or to other senators to be allowed to complete his job?

If it was shut down on politics alone can pressure be applied to re-open the case in the other direction?

Sorry Hoggie, my "read first unread post" took me past this point.

The guidelines, not law, for US Attorney Generals is contained in the "United States Attorneys' Manual" but today the website is treating me with disdain to connect. :)

The exercise of discretion is subject to the A-G's reasoning for declining prosecution being filed internally. It is not a broad unfettered, unaccountable discretion and there are guidelines set out in the manual specifically relating to the matters to be considered before declining prosecution of the case.

The guidelines as I recall only relate a decline of prosecution decision made on the case before the formation of a Grand Jury.

There is nothing within the Manual that I recall about the challenge to the exercise of discretion to decline prosecution other than a party cannot rely on a departure from guidelines as grounds for litigation (against the Fed Government).
 
Delicato said:
Phil Liggett on Armstrong affair



What a ****load of crap. Absolutely disgusting.

i have always said that liggett is parasite and is guilty of misleading the public for his own gain. his income (let alone his credibility) on so many issues is completely tied into his lips being firmly attached to armstrong's cheeks.

liggett is not a journalist. he hardly even understands cycling.
 
May 6, 2009
8,522
1
0
ChrisE said:
LOL. I could imagine the heads exploding in here if he was second in 2010 and got elevated to first. :D

From an entertainment POV this would be hilarious and I'm certain the forum would have gone into meltdown.
 
Jul 22, 2009
3,355
5
0
Race Radio said:
hehehe

A few years from now Lance is going to look back and say "remember those couple days of peace we had before it all hit the fan?"
::facepalm::