USADA-Armstrong Phase II

Page 43 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

LauraLyn

BANNED
Jul 13, 2012
594
0
0
dadane said:
Great to see the UK tabloids are doing proper hard-hitting journalism and enlightening the public to the profound consequences of this controversy. ;)

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/other-sports/cycling/lance-armstrong-banned-tour-de-1278142

thehog said:
The psychological dynamic is interesting.

In both the Landis and Hamilton cases Armstrong was "active" behind the scenes ensuring they were snared.

When caught he was telling them to "fight" so not only did they lose their title but their careers, money, families, everything.

The additional dynamic in regards to Hamilton's ex-wife is particularly sick.

What was also confirmed for me is that the UCI's use of anti-doping is not for anti-doping but "control". By allowing doping but controlling the riders through anti-doping will never set them free. By having Hamilton test positive the UCI clearly doesn't about the sports image. They just like to control who tests positive.

Hard hitting article by The Mirror for Lance.

So British: "Bradley Wiggins was robbed of a historic place on the Tour de France podium three years before he won the Yellow Jersey."

And Wiggo is totally silent (and will remain so).

UCI is only interested in controlling the money.
 

LauraLyn

BANNED
Jul 13, 2012
594
0
0
Briant_Gumble said:
If any of you have facebook, I think Travis Tygart could do with some love:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Travis-Tygart/160670527402969

There's a lot of hate pages from Lance Armstrong shills.

Sad. There seems to be a growing and stronger coordinated movement in the media from Lance supporters to immediately support or attack anything on Lance. The reactions are immediate and really strong.

Travis will be fine. People will recognize him for his intelligence, integrity, and commitment to an important cause.
 
Nov 25, 2009
21
0
0
PhaseII

I believe Hamiltons new book will slow down and/or stop anything he has in mind. Thats why he didnt want to go to arbritration.:)
 
In the French press this morning they're running a story in regards to Armstrong's sports gambling. According to the report he used to bet 400k on himself for the win netting him 5million. Now it becomes interesting if A) because of the doping but also B) forcing other competitors to get caught meaning he knew he was going to win and collect the bet.

That's fraud. A lot of sports don't allow the players to bet on themselves maybe cycling still does.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
thehog said:
In the French press this morning they're running a story in regards to Armstrong's sports gambling. According to the report he used to bet 400k on himself for the win netting him 5million. Now it becomes interesting if A) because of the doping but also B) forcing other competitors to get caught meaning he knew he was going to win and collect the bet.

That's fraud. A lot of sports don't allow the players to bet on themselves maybe cycling still does.

It may also be illegal in certain countries.

Does it detail where he made these bets.

Wonder did Hein, Pat et all do similar?
 
Aug 18, 2012
1,171
0
0
Benotti69 said:
It may also be illegal in certain countries.

Does it detail where he made these bets.

Wonder did Hein, Pat et all do similar?

That was the first thing I thought of, there trying to squash some **** and it's more severe than them taking the reported $125,000 bribe and letting Armstrong get away with it to bring more notoriety to cycling as am marketable representative with a good story.

This seems like the sort of thing they would do beyond just taking a massive, direct cash bribe.

I would guess they would have to create a pseudonym or something.
 
Briant_Gumble said:
That was the first thing I thought of, there trying to squash some **** and it's more severe than them taking the reported $125,000 bribe and letting Armstrong get away with it to bring more notoriety to cycling as am marketable representative with a good story.

This seems like the sort of thing they would do beyond just taking a massive, direct cash bribe.

I would guess they would have to create a pseudonym or something.

I was always intrigued to what was in it for the UCI for Armstrong to continue winning. Armstrong was the one making money not the UCI but with this "arrangement" a few investors could quickly turn 100k into a million of non-taxed income - gambling winnings in Europe are not taxed if it's not your profession.
 

the big ring

BANNED
Jul 28, 2009
2,135
0
0
thehog said:
In the French press this morning they're running a story in regards to Armstrong's sports gambling. According to the report he used to bet 400k on himself for the win netting him 5million. Now it becomes interesting if A) because of the doping but also B) forcing other competitors to get caught meaning he knew he was going to win and collect the bet.

That's fraud. A lot of sports don't allow the players to bet on themselves maybe cycling still does.

Insurance is essentially gambling.

What's detailed above is the SCA insurance case. At a guess. $400k would be the final year premium, with $5M the payout that ended up going to trial and finally settlement.
 

LauraLyn

BANNED
Jul 13, 2012
594
0
0
Race Radio said:
This is just about SCA, not gambling

This is, in fact, old news published a week ago. Nonetheless it is very interesting.

Essentially it is a lawyer from SCA, in Montreal, discussing this "insurance" as a kind of gambling in sports. He points to the recent revelations that Lance may have been informed or tipped off in advance regarding testing.

Clearly the SCA is building and rebuilding their case against Lance to have their money returned (including court costs).

More interesting, in Europe gambling like this as an athlete is illegal and the authorities usually do not take this lightly.

More interesting times for Lance developing.
 
the big ring said:
Insurance is essentially gambling.

What's detailed above is the SCA insurance case. At a guess. $400k would be the final year premium, with $5M the payout that ended up going to trial and finally settlement.

Ring, the payout was $7.5m (Lance got costs), so SCA would be going after that plus seven years of compound interest lol
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
sittingbison said:
Ring, the payout was $7.5m (Lance got costs), so SCA would be going after that plus seven years of compound interest lol

Plus the $4 Million from previous payouts. Plus penalty and interest
 

LauraLyn

BANNED
Jul 13, 2012
594
0
0
sittingbison said:
Ring, the payout was $7.5m (Lance got costs), so SCA would be going after that plus seven years of compound interest lol

Plus more litigation expenses.

It would still not be a huge dent in his bank account, but it will also not be the only one.
 
Race Radio said:
Plus the $4 Million from previous payouts. Plus penalty and interest

Plus their own legal costs. It is reasonable to conclude that the first time around SCA's legal costs were as large as Armstrong's. They would not be entitled to interest on the $5M up to the settlement like Armstrong, so that would be around an additional two million.

$5M + 2.5M + 2M + 4M + interest + legal costs [+ penalty?] = settle for $10M

I still don't see how the settlement agreement would not have boilerplate in it making the deal final.
 
JRTinMA said:
Interesting stuff from twitter. Yes RR you told us about Sheryl Crow first :)

The 2004 positive will be interesting.

This could detonate a nuclear weapon under the entire anti-doping process if the labs are also complicit the cover ups along with the UCI.

Wonder if Ullrich is happy with his 2nd places now?
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
thehog said:
The 2004 positive will be interesting.

This could detonate a nuclear weapon under the entire anti-doping process if the labs are also complicit the cover ups along with the UCI.

Wonder if Ullrich is happy with his 2nd places now?

Forget about who won during these years. They were all losers and deservedly so.

They all had the option of leaving. They stayed and doped. No winners.
 

Latest posts